Two Huge Covid-19 Studies Are Retracted After Scientists Sound Alarms

johnfree7

Full Member
2+ Year Member
Jan 4, 2016
69
30
71
  1. Other Health Professions Student


"The studies, published in renowned scientific journals, produced astounding results and altered the course of research into the coronavirus pandemic.

One undercut President Trump’s claim that certain antimalarial drugs cure Covid-19, the illness caused by the virus, concluding that the medications in fact were dangerous to patients. The other found that some blood pressure drugs did not increase the risk of Covid-19 and might even be protective.

Both studies were led by a professor at Harvard, and both depended on a huge international database of patient medical records that few experts had ever heard of.

But on Thursday, the studies were retracted by the scientific journals in which they had appeared, The New England Journal of Medicine and The Lancet, because the authors could not verify the data on which the results depended."
 
D

deleted927028

HCQ is so dangerous that it kills a lot of patients in two trials. So the medical experts and geniuses have to stop the studies immediately. But the same medicine is so safe for millions and who have been taking it for over 70 years till even today, including nursing women and children. But none of them are dying . So, they are allowed to take it with no restrictions, the medical geniuses say. But remember, the same medicine will transform into life threatening one if you use it in a trial, the same geniuses say. There is some intelligence built into this medicine to figure out if it is used in a trial or consumed for normal use, and it will activate the like killing feature accordingly. Can you find anything more funny? SEE WHAT MONEY DOES TO THE MINDS OF SOME OF THE SUPPOSEDLY BRIGHTEST MINDS IN THE COUNTRY AND MAKES THEM SHAMELESS, STUPID COWARDS. Funnily, the rest of the medical community don’t ask this fundamental stupid question that an idiot like me ask but take the so called stupid study as a gospel . My PCP denied me HCQ citing this study. But he was prescribing the same medicine to his medicine until just a few weeks ago with no issues. The poor gullible people believe that all these medical professionals are Gods that work all the time to take care of them and save their lives.
 
About the Ads
D

deleted927028

It's called a risk-benefit analysis.

The medication has known risks, but in certain settings (malaria, Lupus) it has a known benefit that outweighs the risks.
These geniuses are claiming that IT KILLED A LOT OF PATIENTS. So to your genius mind, IT IS AN ACCEPTABLE RISK to give it to nursing women and children? Are you being serious? If a new medication kills so many patients in the trials that they have to stop the trials (as the geniuses claim) , will it be approved for normal use for 10,20,30 years ? See if you want to argue just for the sake of it , knowing inside that you are indeed lying, what is the point? You will only lose your credibility, integrity and self respect !!!

If some doctors claim that they successfully used HCQ+Zinc in the early stages of the infection and all patients recovered without any issues, the geniuses say , no no the patients would have recovered on their own without HCQ+Zinc. But when the pimps of the drug companies give the same medicine to the patients who are already in the deathbeds and CLAIM THAT HCQ KILLED THEM, the geniuses and people like you are accepting it as a Gospel. What the F is going on here ? In the so called studies, the cowards don’t even mention the dosage, duration and how vulnerable the patients’ health when they were put on HCQ !!! But people like you are willingly ready to suck up whatever the non sense they say without asking any questions.
 

VA Hopeful Dr

Senior Member
Volunteer Staff
15+ Year Member
Jul 28, 2004
25,029
43,442
426
  1. Attending Physician
These geniuses are claiming that IT KILLED A LOT OF PATIENTS. So to your genius mind, IT IS AN ACCEPTABLE RISK to give it to nursing women and children? Are you being serious? If a new medication kills so many patients in the trials that they have to stop the trials (as the geniuses claim) , will it be approved for normal use for 10,20,30 years ? See if you want to argue just for the sake of it , knowing inside that you are indeed lying, what is the point? You will only lose your credibility, integrity and self respect !!!

If some doctors claim that they successfully used HCQ+Zinc in the early stages of the infection and all patients recovered without any issues, the geniuses say , no no the patients would have recovered on their own without HCQ+Zinc. But when the pimps of the drug companies give the same medicine to the patients who are already in the deathbeds and CLAIM THAT HCQ KILLED THEM, the geniuses and people like you are accepting it as a Gospel. What the F is going on here ? In the so called studies, the cowards don’t even mention the dosage, duration and how vulnerable the patients’ health when they were put on HCQ !!! But people like you are willingly ready to suck up whatever the non sense they say without asking any questions.
You do realize you're arguing against a study that was retracted, right?

And that most reasonable doctors only refuse to prescribe this because of lack of benefit.

Also, as always, the insults aren't needed.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 1 users
D

deleted927028

You do realize you're arguing against a study that was retracted, right?

And that most reasonable doctors only refuse to prescribe this because of lack of benefit.

Also, as always, the insults aren't needed.
I apologize if you feel that I insulted you, that was not my intention.

yes, I am aware that the study is retracted. But it is not going to change anything about our falling standards and reputation.
 
About the Ads
This thread is more than 1 year old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.