- Joined
- Jun 11, 2013
- Messages
- 7
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi SDN,
Longtime lurker, new poster. I was fortunate enough to get off the UCSF waitlist a couple weeks ago and am now having a serious dilemma (first world problem). Overall, UCSF has long been my dream school, but San Diego has the allure of a sunnier, probably happier life for four years and with a pretty hefty scholarship, while SF has given me minimal financial aid.
I'm originally from SoCal and went to school in the northeast. I'm interested in academic medicine, and my ideal career would have me seeing patients 3-4 days of the week and doing research/teaching/writing with the remaining time. I've always been really interested in surgery and other procedure heavy specialties, but I know that's bound to change in med school. Given my life and college experiences, I'd also somehow like to incorporate global health or serving the underserved of America in some way or another. I hope to eventually settle down in SoCal (but what do I know at this age? 🙂).
Here's a list of a few pros and cons I've managed to plot for each school. I've asked a few family, friends, students, and physician mentors and gotten different advice from everyone! I'd really appreciate the input of you SDNers, especially current students or graduates (any residents or attendings?). I'm torn, as straight up, I'd prefer SF to try out a completely new area/lifestyle but am unsure if it's worth the cost difference and how much that extra $120k in debt would affect me in the long run.
UCSF
+ San Francisco (city, food, culture, technology)
+ Global health
+ Clinical training sites
+ Name / residency
+ Precision medicine initiative (and overall innovation)
+ Slight advantage in research
- $160k debt....
- Weather (not terrible compared to NE)
- Students spread over city
UCSD
+ San Diego (weather, beer, beach)
+ $160k in scholarship over 4 years (ie $40k debt)
+ Higher average board scores
+ Closer to home
+ Affordable, on campus housing
- Fewer global health opportunities
- Less work with underprivileged
- Wealthy "sterile" suburb
I'd appreciate any comments you have. Thanks!
Longtime lurker, new poster. I was fortunate enough to get off the UCSF waitlist a couple weeks ago and am now having a serious dilemma (first world problem). Overall, UCSF has long been my dream school, but San Diego has the allure of a sunnier, probably happier life for four years and with a pretty hefty scholarship, while SF has given me minimal financial aid.
I'm originally from SoCal and went to school in the northeast. I'm interested in academic medicine, and my ideal career would have me seeing patients 3-4 days of the week and doing research/teaching/writing with the remaining time. I've always been really interested in surgery and other procedure heavy specialties, but I know that's bound to change in med school. Given my life and college experiences, I'd also somehow like to incorporate global health or serving the underserved of America in some way or another. I hope to eventually settle down in SoCal (but what do I know at this age? 🙂).
Here's a list of a few pros and cons I've managed to plot for each school. I've asked a few family, friends, students, and physician mentors and gotten different advice from everyone! I'd really appreciate the input of you SDNers, especially current students or graduates (any residents or attendings?). I'm torn, as straight up, I'd prefer SF to try out a completely new area/lifestyle but am unsure if it's worth the cost difference and how much that extra $120k in debt would affect me in the long run.
UCSF
+ San Francisco (city, food, culture, technology)
+ Global health
+ Clinical training sites
+ Name / residency
+ Precision medicine initiative (and overall innovation)
+ Slight advantage in research
- $160k debt....
- Weather (not terrible compared to NE)
- Students spread over city
UCSD
+ San Diego (weather, beer, beach)
+ $160k in scholarship over 4 years (ie $40k debt)
+ Higher average board scores
+ Closer to home
+ Affordable, on campus housing
- Fewer global health opportunities
- Less work with underprivileged
- Wealthy "sterile" suburb
I'd appreciate any comments you have. Thanks!