- Joined
- Jan 13, 2011
- Messages
- 20,109
- Reaction score
- 20,915
***lynch dwin**** ... Slight suspicion.
***lynch dwin**** ... Slight suspicion.
Swings voted for SOV and TRH...doubting they were wolves at that time. (unless it's a sneaky wolf move)
KB voted early on the swings vote--2nd person--that would be crazy to vote for your own wolfmates that early in a lynch, I'd think.
What are y'all's thoughts on all that?
I guess I am missing why everyone is lynching 3d3c...
Is it the high likelihood of being converted? Seems kind of asinine to throw out a lynch vote for a villager with a role ability without a little more discussion.
Throwing a vote out for a fellow wolf when you doubt there will be a bandwagon is a classic wolf move. And if that wolf ends up getting lynched...well then you can always be like "but I voted for them!"
Swings changed to TRH pretty close to the deadline...
Thanks. Has anyone been a lynch avoider as a villager this game? I know someone with this role, and I also know they cannot use it this cycle.
Throwing a vote out for a fellow wolf when you doubt there will be a bandwagon is a classic wolf move. And if that wolf ends up getting lynched...well then you can always be like "but I voted for them!"
Swings changed to TRH pretty close to the deadline...
Still a vanilla villager. Keep fishin'.
***whoops.
Forgot I'd quoted 3d3c.
Who was it that couldn't use the lynch avoider last cycle? Obviously Swings used it when we lynched her.
Thanks. Has anyone been a lynch avoider as a villager this game? I know someone with this role, and I also know they cannot use it this cycle.
old man
She mentioned she had received a PM the night that everything switched up. Those of us who remained vanilla villagers did not receive a PM at all, so either she became a wolf or a villager with a role.
One would think that if she were a villager with a role, the wolves would have probably moved to off her relatively quickly - not necessarily, for the reasons SOV pointed out but the fact that she's still alive AND hasn't been investigated (or no one has shared results) by the presumable villager seer is a bit fishy.
Lynch Dwin Suspicious.
Also, why the heck is everyone (ok not everyone, but quite a few people) asking why people are not coming forward with investigation results? Seriously. Unless there is a wolf, or a villager that has been cleared recently is about to be lynched that should be kept as quiet as possible. The only thing that coming out and saying who has been cleared will do is direct the wolves towards which group the seer is, which is not good.
I'm gonna go with lynch Tucker
Something about her and TRH's convo about swings and low numbers of posting seemed off to me.
This is pretty much my thinking as well.Yeah, I've been a little puzzled by that. I'm operating under the assumption that whoever the villager seer is, they are playing reasonably intelligently and investigated SOV first night post-Event, and then either a co-group member second night or 3D3C second night (reversing those for the third night), and then will be sharing their investigation results with the cleared group member. Bonus points if it's someone IN SOV or 3D3C's group so they can conserve by clearing one of them and sharing with the same one. That's just straightforward seer strategy.
Beyond that, there's no reason to say anything in thread if SOV and 3D3C are villagers.
If our villager seer is out there doing random investigations as well as not sharing the results with someone ... then all I can do is facepalm.
And if we don't actually HAVE a villager seer ... then I'll just keep voting based on suspicion and guesswork. *shrug*
Defensive much?
I was merely pointing out she switched to you close to the deadline when it was pretty clear she was the one going down...but whatever.
TRH, I just have one question... you lynched alors to start off (I know you have unlynched her since) with saying that you are "just doing the same thing you have been." Which to me means, the 1 wolf/group theory again, but swings was the wolf in that group if you go with your theory... so why lynch anyone in that group then?
It just struck me as odd...
TRH, I just have one question... you lynched alors to start off (I know you have unlynched her since) with saying that you are "just doing the same thing you have been." Which to me means, the 1 wolf/group theory again, but swings was the wolf in that group if you go with your theory... so why lynch anyone in that group then?
It just struck me as odd...
The wolves gained a convert last night, meaning that there should still be four wolves in the game, and four groups. So in my group, I know that I'm a villager, leaving me with dwin and alors. I had chosen alors, but as others are now choosing dwin, I switched over to him.
So you are guessing that the wolves converted someone in that group last night?
If I go off of the one wolf per group theory, yes. But as you have pointed out, there may have been more than one wolf in the group to start with, so dwin or alors could have been original wolves2 or converted last night.
Ok, but the original post you made was "just doing what I have been doing since the start of the game", and then you lynched alors, which if you are doing what you had been since start of game you would be assuming she has been converted. That is what is odd to me. Especially now with you stating that there could be more than 1 wolf/group after you had said you were using the 1 wolf/group theory still earlier on. I guess I am just trying to understand your thought process, because it isn't making sense to me.
I'm not really sure what's so hard to understand.
My thought process:
One wolf per group (not necessarily 100% true at all times, but a theory to work with)
Swings (wolf) killed, conversion in same night = still 4 wolves
Possibility that conversion occurred in group where wolf just died (group 1) to keep ears to the ground in all groups.
Choose between alors or dwin.
The possibility that there was more than one wolf per group and thus two original wolves2 in the group is just a tip of the hat to you saying there may have been more than one wolf per group. Either way, it is possible that there is a wolf in my group at this time, hence why I chose to lynch from within my own group.
I would just guess that if you are going to follow your original thought process why continue with that group where the wolf was already found? I mean, why look for the convert when there are originals out there? Also, ears in groups only helps if people are talking.... I don't know about your group (but I am assuming from your posts that yours is the same) there really isn't much PMing going on over in my group. I don't know the comment of still going with your original theory and then lynching someone in a group where a wolf was already found was just odd to me... why not stick with one person consistently? Like you did with abbers before the role switch up?