Is there anyone who can speak for the competitive nature of this program? In past threads, I have read that it is very competitive and cutthroat. It has been mentioned that they don't have much extra academic support due to the pace, either. Could someone verify these things?
Thanks so much!
1) Can anyone speak for the competitive nature of this program?
Competitive meaning competitive with other programs, or students within the program competing against each other?
If you mean the former, MABS is definitely well regarded and will give you a leg up on other applicants.
If you mean the latter, I never felt things were competitive between classmates. Since benchmarks are a flat score and there's no ceiling on how many students can achieve those benchmarks, I felt that the atmosphere between classmates was supportive and collaborative. In contrast, I have a friend in a different SMP whose benchmarks are percentage based (for example, only the top X% are guaranteed a seat to their parent med school). They are competitive, no one works together outside of tiny cliques, and they're all suspicious of each other.
2) Cutthroat?
The benchmarks are the most cutthroat things you have to worry about. If you get a 3.4 GPA and benchmarks are 3.5, they will not make an exception. But like kro21 said a few posts above, many students who didn't meet benchmarks got interviews and acceptances elsewhere. Just completing this program holds weight.
3) Academic support
The faculty are very supportive, but they will not hold your hand. For example, most profs will happily guide your studying and point you in the direction of whats high-yield and what's low-yield. They might even outright say "this will be on the exam" or "I will not test on this" during lecture. If you need help understanding something, they'll happily spend time rewording or re-explaining a concept during lecture, during breaks, during office hours, or over email. In another example, one even offered to help us find a study partner if we needed one.
They will not, however, make tests easier just because you are struggling (yes, I heard someone ask this). Don't expect them to slow the entire pace of the course or reduce the amount of content on an exam (yes, I also heard this). If you are 1 incorrect question away from turning your 89.45 into a 89.50—which would round up to 90, which is an A—they will not perform magic on your grades (yes, I heard someone complain about this). If you fail an exam, they will not give make-up exams (to my knowledge). In fairness, I've heard some faculty give outdated/poor advice and some profs are more open to arguing for a potentially poorly-worded question to be voided than others, but my experience of asking individual profs "How do I better study for your exams?" has been generally positive.
Also, I think we got a dedicated academic advisor this year, but I don't think students found them super helpful. Then again, I can't recall the last time anyone found an academic advisor super helpful.