- Joined
- Dec 18, 2007
- Messages
- 42
- Reaction score
- 0
Ditto those above--remember, it only takes ONE good interview! All those other schools don't matter if you're accepted at a school you like.
Ditto those above--remember, it only takes ONE good interview! All those other schools don't matter if you're accepted at a school you like.
I know. It's just hard to be completely positive when so many people interview at several schools and don't get accepted anywhere.
yes, but they are them and you are you and their experience has no bearing whatsoever on your experience. you will go on this interview and kick some butt. remember, this is the school with good judgment. the others don't know what they're doing. i have faith in you. i know you'll do well. if they didn't want you they would not have invited you.
CUNY - that is just great. I bet all of you live somewhere in the NYC and have paid taxes that go to support CUNY and then they turn around and reject you. Of course, the same can be said of many state schools located in places where people are tax paying residences. Even worse is when these public schools accept people from out of state, or out of the city, over people who who have residency in the school's state/ city. I wonder if there is some type of legal recourse for this. State or public schools have to offer different rates of tuition for in state/ locale vs out of sate/ locale. If there were some type of legal precedent that gave an in state or in city resident preference for admissions to a public school within his/ her locale over a non-resident, this would completely shake up the academic world. The deck would be completely reshuffled. Public schools, or private schools which took state/ city money, could no longer easily draw the students from around the country or students would move to establish residency in a locale in which they wanted to attend a school. I would wager that there is a legal case to made but no one has ever bothered to challenge the academic establishment. Anyone here with a law background or with wealthy parents who wants to attempt to rock the boat?
1) I actually think it would be detrimental to the system if state schools showed preference to people from their own state (in terms of diversity, strength of applicants, etc.), but that's just me--I'm also not applying to any schools in my home state...
Have any of these rejections followed an interview?
Mine did not, and I would guess the others were the same, since about 5 of us received the letter on the same day.
So, is it just me or is getting rejected after an in-person interview a bit (read A LOT) more offensive/upsetting?
That does hurt a lot more ... especially if you thought your in person interview went well (as I had believed in my case since my POI even had me talk to 2-3 extra lab members for more info). In hindsight, I can see where things went wrong ... and to be honest, the match wasn't ideal. That said, it still hurt and I won't lie, I even shed a few tears
What hurt me the most about my post-interview rejection were the comments I've read/heard about how interviews are meant for "screening out the crazies" and how those who are rejected post interview are socially inept, too confident, not confident enough, CRAZY, etc. That made me doubt myself and I even inquired with the DCT on this forum about whether or not that's true. He assured me it wasn't and reminded me that EVERYONE at interviews are highly qualified and even if my interviews went really well, someone who interviewed after me could have been a better match. Or maybe the POI did like me but another faculty member didn't want to admit me over an alternative student who did better on their GRE. Whatever. You never know and it really does hurt to get rejected, but you get over it! You will survive!!!
Ding #2: Simon Fraser University (SFU)
Was that following an interview?
I was turned off by this letter as well. The terseness of it just felt inconsiderate.I also received this rejection letter, and I must say, it kind of pissed me off. Just the way they worded it..."I trust you will be able to adjust your plans in accordance with this decision." I don't know why, that sentence just rubbed me the wrong way. I will be able to adjust Virginia Consortium, thank you very much!
Checked my online status today and found this:
Your application has been reviewed, and the Committee has denied admission.
So that's four official rejections for me.
New Jersey, New Jersey,
Heartache to Heartbreak
I'll always have Newark International
So last night WVU and Pittsburgh were playing each other in basketball (both schools I got rejected from) and I found myself yelling 'WVU AND PITTSBURGH SUCK, YOU CAN BOTH KISS MY A$$" at the TV
I feel MUCH better now.
Okay...soooo, this I think is one of the worst stories ever (except one I read earlier about someone applying and then the school rejected EVERYONE due to lack of funding)...but, here goes.
I had an interview from 8-8 ON MY BIRTHDAY to one of my top choice schools. I am told I'm only competing with 2 other applicants and so I get my hopes wayyyy wayyyy up.
I meet my POI at a pre-interview party and they are SOSOSOSOSO sweet....(can we say "hopes get higher?")
All my other interviews have been a piece of cake, so I figure I have it in the bag.
Well, interview day comes around, and apparently the word has gotten around that I'm into psychometrics.
My first interview is with a statistician who has apparently been telling everyone that he plans on quizzing me when he meets me. Cue, multiple regression EXAM. I lovee stats, but I haven't reviewed it in a year or so, so a popquiz on the parameters of various multiple regression lines was kind of nervewracking.
He says I did GREAT on the stats part, but that "nothing in [my] resume' indicates an interest in clinical psych, as I have not had previous clinical experience, and that I should just join his I/O psych program which he heads."
I leave the interview 1) disappointed that he focused on my lack of clinical experience 2) wondering if I SHOULD apply to his I/O program and 3) five minutes late to my next interview because of the lecture on 1 and 2 that I was given.
I arrive to my interview with my POI, 5 minutes late, as mentioned....the first question is "are you skilled in computer programming?"
my thoughts? ...weird question, but okay.... "no, but I am willing to learn." standard response, right? Okay, well the next question is "did you read the article I sent you?"
I don't remember any articles...I either didn't get it or I got it and didn't look at it carefully enough...but since I had e-mailed a group of long-forgotten profs in advance saying I HAD read their articles, I couldn't deny having gotten it, since I MAY have. So, there as nothing to do but admit to not having the articles. NO harm done, I figure. I won't get into this school for sure, and I can leave the interview early, at 11 am and salvage some of my birthday!
WELL. He berates me for not having read it, for not having looked it up on Google or Pubmed, etc...and then prints out a 50-page article and gives me 1 1/2 hrs to read it. He tells me to come back AFTER interview day is completed and interview him again because whether or not I will be accepted to the school is ENTIRELY DEPENDENT UPON my understanding of the article or lack thereof.
Flash forward 90 minutes later.
I enter the office and am instructed to summarize the article. I come to a point where interrater reliability comes up and he asks me why omega was used instead of pearson product moment correlation (a fact which I learned later the 3rd year grad students at that program JUST learned), and of course I don't know, and I have to admit that. I know what PPMC is, but not the different between the two. He just keeps telling me to "think about it, you'll figure it out" and of course I can't. The rest of the interview proceeds as such and in the end, I actually get my hopes up again! He says he'll send me more articles, and to get more clinical experience as soon as possible to prepare myself and to call if I have any questions.
Three days later ALL the applicants for this Prof get mutually rejected because he wants someone with computer programming skills!!
This was the first question in the interview and we could have been done at that point. There was no need to make every single one of his applicants cry (which I was told he did), and to put all of them through such stress if he already knew he had no need of non-computer-programmers.
In fact, none of us needed to have been interviewed. A phone call would have sufficed if you ask me.
blagh.
waste of my last birthday before I have to move for grad school
Received a very nice rejection letter from IUP on Monday. Even though they rejected me, they did so graciously and in a way that makes me feel hopeful because they say something like, "We are sure you will gain admittance to another doctoral program". OTOH, if they didn't want me what makes them think someone else will? (This was a post-interview rejection.)
Just got my official unofficial ding from SDSU/UCSD. Sigh, it was my biggest reach, but I would love love love to go there. Maybe I'll end up in SD for internship.
I got an e-mail that said it is highly unlikely I will be accepted and official e-mail notification will come from SDSU over e-mail soon.
I am just going to assume it is because I am overqualified.
.