JonD-08 said:
Let the second years in on this, what happened?
Ok. We have a new biochem format this year. about 90% of our information comes from a book, the other 10% is Akins lovely DNA lectures. First test happens and low and behold a couple of the professors use questions that are directly out of the back of the book! Amazing! Those of us who used those questions were basically given about 5 or 6 bonus points.
Test 2 rolls around. Most of us figure, hey those profs used q's out of the back of the book for the last test, let's make a point to study them this time around and hope that we get a couple of freebies. This time however a good 20 questions out of a 70 question test are direct copies. So an illustrious classmate sends out the following:
just to let you kids know, after talking to a bunch of 1st years who took the exam, i sent this email to our biochem profs....let me know if you guys think i crossed the line. peace- ryan
Dear Dr. Lightbody, Dr. Gatti, and Dr. Kovari,
I am writing this email with regards to today's exam questions, many of which were taken from the back of the book. It seems that to appropriately test a student's knowledge of the material, one should not use questions already seen, some word-for-word, from the back of the book. This also rewards those students who prefer to slack and know to memorize the back of the book questions rather than focusing on the material presented in the lectures. Also, when told to focus on certain things and to ignore others ("Do not learn this, Do not memorize this"), it is disheartening and very unfair to see them on the exam, knowing that we wholly swept over them in lecture and that the focus on lecture slides was reiterated, especially during review sessions. If you would like the quotation of specific examples, I would be more than happy to provide those. Please respond-
Needless to say this ticked off a whole bunch of students who were just glad that they had looked at those questions and pulled a decent score. The average for the test was 80%-ish so it isn't like the whole class aced the damn thing.
So in one of the responses to this *****ic waste of an e-mail, is a student who says "hey, someone posted on the WSUSOM student forums the numbers of the questions from the back of the book if you want to know them." (Can you hear it? Death by Admin has been resurrected.)
So this prompts the administration to send out an e-mail to the entire class of 09 stating that they are looking for the identity of the student whose screen name is "..(name has been deleted to protect the student whom in my opinion did nothing wrong).." on the forum site because they would like to bring him/her up on professionalism charges in front of the committee because the post was in violation of the protected exam clause. It also encouraged anyone who knows the identity of this person to turn him/her in, anonymously of course.
My biggest beef is this: If the admisitration wants to get their shorts in a knot, they should be doing so at the course director and the professors who didn't write a 1/3 of the test and took the easy way out. Anybody after the test could open the back of the book and see the numbers of the questions in the test. In fact a whole group of us sat and looked them all up right after the test to see if we got them right (I'm sure other students were all doing this as well). My hope is that the student in question keeps his/her head down and lets this all blow over. I intend on taking this whole issue to the curriculum committee and anybody else who will listen because this whole thing is really pissing me off.
So basically a bunch of us figure that after this whole fiasco that the third biochem test is going to suck sweaty donkey balls.
You can check out the WSU forums, year 1, ******ed People for other comments.