- Joined
- Oct 10, 2011
- Messages
- 8,628
- Reaction score
- 10,714
Don't know the numbers, but just based on logic, NPs will probably have higher rates of litigation since they will likely have higher miss rates for emergent conditions, probably give inappropriate treatments, and be a easier, juicier target for an attorney than an educated physician.
Mismanagement of PCP issues is a chronic issue most of the time, and lawsuits are unlikely as NPs just shuffle any patients of questionable stability to the local ER for dumping. Many malpractice suits are brought on not because of a bad outcome, but because of dissatisfaction with the tone or attitude of the person involved in their care.
NPs will smile, give Abx (and whatever else patients want), miss chronic diagnoses (that may not catastrophically manifest until later), and send patients to the ED when there is any instability to them. This is likely to mitigate their malpractice risk (compared to the not knowing aspect which increases it). I imagine patients who are educated enough to know about the lower level of education of NPs will self-select out of an NP's practice and go see MDs only.
I would encourage PCP MDs to not accept 'referrals' from independent practice NPs who have been monitoring a patient's progressive symptoms for 5 years without doing anything about it, and since their cookie cutter 'medicine' has not fixed it, they send to somebody else to manage it. Independent NPs will order more imaging studies, more consults, more testing than the average physician PCP.
At least, I think.