- Joined
- Nov 13, 2013
- Messages
- 585
- Reaction score
- 328
You were the only one to get a "new" test, and you got the highest score.Yeah, except me fingerprints aren't on t' money. Where's t' hard evidence/proof? It doesn't exist.
You were the only one to get a "new" test, and you got the highest score.Yeah, except me fingerprints aren't on t' money. Where's t' hard evidence/proof? It doesn't exist.
Your metaphorical fingerprints are the fact that you were the only person whose test went missing.Yeah, except me fingerprints aren't on t' money. Where's t' hard evidence/proof? It doesn't exist.
Ok man, all I can say is that you are in a small minority of people who think that the odds aren't against you into medical school with a pitiful 3.4 gpa.Wat. All me be sayin' be it be possible to get into a medical school wit a 3.4. Even so wit barely a 3.0 and some additional "supplements".
Ok man, all me can say be that ye be in a small minority of people who think that t' odds aren't against ye into medical school wit a pitiful 3.4 gpa.
Nope. It was the majority of science classes at one of the top-ranked schools in the country. The tests were closed-note takehomes because they often required 8-24hrs to complete. However, even the 2hr ones were frequently takehomes.Lmao. This be pathetic. "Closed notes" take-home finals?
That's honestly t' lamest thin' me've ever heard. me can't imagine how senile a professor must be to willingly hand out take home finals and believe that students be not goin' to use their notes. No offense, but must have been an easy class/school.
No they aren't. For all we know the clumsy and old professor could have actually lost the test. Not an apt analogy at all.yer metaphorical fingerprints be t' fact that ye were t' only person whose test went missin'.
:troll::troll::troll::troll::troll::troll::troll::troll::troll:
Taking advantage of old people? You're going to be the worst doctor to ever. Oh wait, that is IF you can still get an acceptance to a school after you get caught.No they aren't. For all we know t' clumsy and old professor could have actually lost t' test. Not an apt analogy at all.
Is this a serious question? I have a 3.92 gpa. Half the battle is grades and the other half is the MCAT. The better yours are, the higher your chances of getting accepted.OP, why be ye [me]so[/me] sure that yar be goin' to get in?
be this a serious question? me have a 3.92 gpa. Half t' battle be grades and t' other half be t' MCAT. t' better yours be, t' higher yer chances of gettin' accepted.
Each stage of yer academic career be t' same. To get into college, ye need grades and ACT/SAT. t' better it be, t' more competitive ye'll be.
To get into medical school ye need GPA + MCAT.
To get into residency ye need grades + Step 1 and Step 2 CK. Very simple.
Wait, he isn't a troll? Holy crap!
Even if a 3.4 GPA was pitiful OP (and it isn't) at least we earned that GPA and don't have to have a giant pit in our stomachs about bein' caught cheatin' in t' major way that would blacklist ye from pretty much every medical school in t' country.
ERPCT has a great point, ye had to cheat in an undergrad class, what be goin' to happen to ye in medical school?
Just pointing out how dumb of an analogy that poster made. Comparing fingerprints (hard evidence) to a missing test (weak evidence) is lame.Takin' advantage of old people? yar be goin' to be t' worst pirate to ever. Oh wait, that be IF ye can still get an acceptance to a school after ye get caught.
Nope. It was a great analogy.Just pointin' out how dumb of an analogy that poster made. Comparin' fingerprints (hard evidence) to a missin' test (weak evidence) be lame.
Just pointin' out how dumb of an analogy that poster made. Comparin' fingerprints (hard evidence) to a missin' test (weak evidence) be lame.
It's a better than B average... but average isn't going to cut it for medical school. Sure a 3.4 looks great for other programs, but the fact remains that it's a very unimpressive gpa for medical school.Why be 3.4 pitiful?
You might be the most uninformed, arrogant pre-med ever if you don't think an interview can make or break you.be this a serious question? me have a 3.92 gpa. Half t' battle be grades and t' other half be t' MCAT. t' better yours be, t' higher yer chances of gettin' accepted.
Each stage of yer academic career be t' same. To get into college, ye need grades and ACT/SAT. t' better it be, t' more competitive ye'll be.
To get into medical school ye need GPA + MCAT.
To get into residency ye need grades + Step 1 and Step 2 CK. Very simple.
it be a better than B average... but average isn't goin' to cut it for medical school. Sure a 3.4 looks great for other programs, but t' fact remains that it be a very unimpressive gpa for medical school.
Nope. It was t' majority of science classes at one of t' top-ranked schools in t' country. t' tests were closed-note takehomes because they often required 8-24hrs to complete. However, even t' 2hr ones were frequently takehomes.
It was so common to have a closed-note takehome that t' Registrar's office was open for extended hours durin' finals period to check 2hr exams in and out.
See, at me school, t' profs trusted us. We trusted each other. And honestly, in 4yrs thar, me never once heard of anyone even hintin' at cheatin' on t' exams. It just wasn't how things were done. Call me naive if ye want (and me be sure ye will), but if ye weren't thar ye simply cannot understand what it was like. me have 100% faith that thar was less cheatin' among me classmates, wit our preposterous 'trust' policy, than at most schools wit proctored exams.
Of course, it helps that thar were usually fewer than 10 people in each class...t' prof would know if ye were suddenly doin' 8x better than expected. Larger courses had in-class exams (though t' prof would usually go sit in their office down t' hall and ye had to go find them if ye had questions.)
Someone should post this on 4chan or Reddit. He'll definitely get caught.
ONE time. Come on people... get off your moral high horse. None of you can say you've never broken a few rules. Whether it's speeding over the limit, drinking before 21, lying... all of you have committed some act of deception/dishonesty before.me didn't want Bs either when me was in school, but me wasn't okay wit cheatin' to get t' A.
Meh. In a 6 person class I would usually be studying with 2 of my classmates, we would do similarly as each other, and the others would do worse than us. If any of them were cheating, they were terrible at it (aka the ones with me didn't do any better than me with the same study time, and the ones I didn't see did worse than us, which if they cheated to attain I don't begrudge them.)Well if ye went to a top school, yer classmates were probably smart enough to keep it on t' dl unlike t' OP yo ho ho.
ONE time. Come on people... get off yer moral high horse. None of ye can say ye've never broken a few rules. Whether it be speedin' over t' limit, drinkin' before 21, lyin'... all of ye have committed some act of deception/dishonesty before.
Nope. Not deception. I'm quite upfront about my tendency to speed and the fact that I drank at under 21. That's not deception, and it didn't screw anyone else over.ONE time. Come on people... get off yer moral high horse. None of ye can say ye've never broken a few rules. Whether it be speedin' over t' limit, drinkin' before 21, lyin'... all of ye have committed some act of deception/dishonesty before.
Top 20 undergrad... already said that this was an abnormally hard test. AND we got effed over by the fire alarm so focus/rhythm was completely disrupted. You act like I do this regularly... it was the first time. Don't tell me you've never done something ethically questionable.What school do ye go to? be it really that hard that ye need to cheat?
Top 20 undergrad... already said that this was an abnormally hard test. AND we got effed over by t' fire alarm so focus/rhythm was completely disrupted. ye act like me do this regularly... it was t' first time. Don't tell me ye've never done somethin' ethically questionable.
I've done plenty of ****ty things in my life, but none as ****ty as what you've described here.Top 20 undergrad... already said that this was an abnormally hard test. AND we got effed over by t' fire alarm so focus/rhythm was completely disrupted. ye act like me do this regularly... it was t' first time. Don't tell me ye've never done somethin' ethically questionable.
ONE time. Come on people... get off yer moral high horse. None of ye can say ye've never broken a few rules. Whether it be speedin' over t' limit, drinkin' before 21, lyin'... all of ye have committed some act of deception/dishonesty before.
So it's cool for you to break rules when it suits you but not ok for me? Ok dude, sure.Nope. Not deception. me be quite upfront about me tendency to speed and t' fact that me drank at under 21. That's not deception, and it didn't screw anyone else over.
So it be cool for ye to break rules when it suits ye but not ok for me? Ok dude, sure.
I didn't say that. You used underage drinking and speeding as examples of 'deception'. They were terrible examples.So it be cool for ye to break rules when it suits ye but not ok for me? Ok dude, sure.
Top 20 undergrad... already said that this was an abnormally hard test. AND we got effed over by t' fire alarm so focus/rhythm was completely disrupted. ye act like me do this regularly... it was t' first time. Don't tell me ye've never done somethin' ethically questionable.
Shhhhh......why would you help him? I was trying to do it slowly. Thanks a lot.OP, as yer lawyer me advise ye to stop givin' away any more information about yer identity. We now know ye go to a top 20 school, be currently in pchem, and got a 99% while t' avg. was a 44%. Any more info and they be goin' to find yer ass OP.
Yup. People like to rationalize their actions with 'well, everyone does it' and it stings to find out that no, you're unusually a$shole-ish.Why did ye even post this thread? Like honestly, did ye expect us to be all to be like "Yo man, no worries. Been thar, done that."?
Ok Shirley, believe whatever you want. Fact is, with the right grades, MCAT and activities anyone can get into medical school. There's no shortage of people with good intentions and great interview skills who have USELESS stats - low gpa, low mcat, maybe even both. These people have no chance of getting in. Schools screen applicants out solely on the basis of their numbers.ye might be t' most uninformed, arrogant pre-med ever if ye don't think an interview can make or break ye.
hahaShhhhh......why would ye help him? me was tryin' to do it slowly. argh a lot.
Did you even read my post? Your arrogant personality can kill your chances for an acceptance. I hope it does.Ok Shirley, believe whatever ye want. Fact be, wit t' right grades, MCAT and activities anyone can get into medical school. thar's no shortage of people wit good intentions and great interview skills who have USELESS stats - low gpa, low mcat, maybe even both. These people have no chance of gettin' in. Schools screen applicants out solely on t' basis of their numbers.
Havin' t' stats be harder than acin' t' interview. Most people can't get t' stats.
Ok Shirley, believe whatever ye want. Fact be, wit t' right grades, MCAT and activities anyone can get into medical school. thar's no shortage of people wit good intentions and great interview skills who have USELESS stats - low gpa, low mcat, maybe even both. These people have no chance of gettin' in. Schools screen applicants out solely on t' basis of their numbers.
Havin' t' stats be harder than acin' t' interview. Most people can't get t' stats.