- Joined
- Mar 31, 2008
- Messages
- 1,812
- Reaction score
- 2,622
Some parts of San Diego too. Low property taxes and relatively limited land to build on means housing isn’t a terrible investment long term.
In other parts of the country it’s much easier to build outwards. It’s simple economics — with less supply constraint, property values won’t appreciate as much. Dallas is a good example of this with so many newer suburbs popping up around the metro area.
If you gave me $2 million, I would much rather buy a house in Southern California even if it’s only a 2,000 sqft track house. Sure that same amount will get you a house three times as big elsewhere, but odds are property taxes will be higher, it’ll be in a suburb 30-60 minutes from downtown, and in five years another newer development will pop up right next to you.
Gf and I have been looking for a house in Irvine. We were asking our realtor if we bought a ~2500 sq ft house we like (but don’t love) in the Irvine village/neighborhood we love (Great Parks much different vibe compared to Orchard Hills) and found a house we really love 4-5 years later, how much money would we lose selling and buying another house since we would not have lived there that long. She laughed and said “you would make money on that house in 2 years.”