I interviewed in November and was accepted in December. In comparing it to the other schools that I've interviewed at (Harvard, Columbia, Penn, Duke, etc...), I really think the curriculum is among the best. For the first year, all the classes end at 1:00, every day. It's a traditional lecture style, and I'm much more comfortable with that than the PBL at Harvard-- it just seems to me that you'd learn a lot more. Plus, you wouldn't have the gaps in education that I think are inevitable if you're left to learn it on your own.
Also, in speaking to physicians, it seems to me that the reputation at Hopkins is the best; it is at least the equal of Harvard. And as far as facilities are concerned, there's no way you can go wrong; this is one of the best places on earth. Another aspect that I really appreciated is that all the hospitals that you do rotations at are part of Hopkins, meaning that they're used to having students with them and you don't have to travel a long distance to go from once place to the other.
The only disadvantage, if you would like to call it such, is that Hopkins is in a bad area of Baltimore, and on the whole, Baltimore does not have the cultural offerings of Boston or New York. I'm a JHU undergrad, however, and I have no problem with this area; in fact, I like it a lot. I think that there's a lot of potential for change and service, and those who like to be involved in the community and in serving underserved areas will have a litany of things to choose from.
I've been mulling over the difference between these schools for a while, so I'd love if anybody could contribute some more to this conversation.
BOTS