You go into little rooms for an hour at a time. Inside, a bunch of people will read you powerpoints that you could have read at home on your own. If you have the ability to show the slightest amount of critical thought, you will realize that you don't really have to come. Nothing in pharmacy school is really that intellectually challenging.
However, if you just stay at home, it pisses them off. Why? Because academics are people that need to feel superior to everyone else. And, somehow, they figure that if they read you the powerpoints, you will "get it" more. Occasionally, you'll get the ******* professor that thinks its a nifty idea to put little fill in the blanks in their powerpoints. Why would they do that? Same reason. They claim its an "education strengthening device." In reality, it's another mechanism to make them feel important...because they think it makes people show up to get the fill-in-the-blanks. Which, of course, means they will attend, which, of course, means that they will get to feel important all over again.
Some professors might teach (in the truest sense of the word) using Socratic method. Those are the people you learn something from. However, they are typically shunned by your fellow students because they can't handle something that isn't written down on paper and acts as a defined set of information that will "be on the test." When those professors taught, I would be in the first row, paying attention, and ready to go. It was rare to actually learn something rather than memorize something.
Anyway, this cycle continues for three long years.
Then you go on rotations...where you need to begin overtly kissing ass. This is the most important part. I know this because I was there with students who cared about 1/10th of the amount I did, yet their evaluations were always better than mine because they had a better "attitude." Essentially, they were better liars than me vis-a-vis putting up a facade that was palatable to the various academics we came into contact with. So the biggest lesson you learn in year 4 is that academics enjoy being lied to. If you tell them anything less than that their rotations are enthralling experiences, you will be punished. I was reprimanded because I complained about a rotation where I sat in a room at a mail order pharmacy for 40 hours a week putting tablets into boxes. An administrator at WVU told me that a good student would be able to still learn something in that environment. Thankfully, I just shut my trap and let them crucify me on "lesser charges" before I made it worse.
And then you might go on to a residency...which is basically another year of rotations, but they pay you like $4 an hour or something. But it's faster paced (i.e. you are the workhorse that schleps tons of bull**** on your back...and still with that underling student forced smile, natch). It's worth it because at the end, you get to attach a 4-letter acronym after your name IN ADDITION to the 6-letter acronym you get for graduating pharmacy school. Double-fig's worth of letters after your name is just as important as a 6-fig salary. In some cases, more important.
Or, you will go work in the real world. You will notice that you perform better than all of these other pharmacists that were members of Rho Chi. The reason is that pharmacy school grading appears to be centered around jumping through hoops and acting in a certain manner rather than what you actually know. Thankfully, the real world doesn't give a **** about that. They only care if you can do your job or not. Which is why like 3 months after I graduated and got licensed I found myself hanging out in the ICU alone running codes. Even though the same administrator as above told me that some professors "didn't know how I made it through pharmacy school." It makes me stop and wonder where I'd be if academia conformed itself to students rather than making students conform to it.
But, anyway...
In essence, it's traumatizing. Good luck with all that.
thumbdown
