Originally posted by Adapt
I would say that generic ones are better than nothing. If you don't have anything else, then just get that.
JKDMed, this is such a load of uninformed crap, and I'm not just saying that because nobody likes Slickness. People shouldn't be throwing out advice because THEY THINK THEY KNOW EVERYTHING! Seriously...there's just no room to give people trying to get into med school useless and bad advice. So here's some good advice.
I was in a similar situation last year when applying. I needed one final rec from a physics prof and I wasn't sure if he knew we well enough, even though I did well in the class. So I asked if he would be able to write me a GOOD recommendation, because anything generic does absolutely NOTHING for your application. He politely said he didn't feel he knew me well enough to say wonderful things about me. So I went out and shadowed a second DO and got a rec from him a month later. He sent me a copy of it too; he made me seem nothing short of this genius super-DO to be. This rec definately got the attention of adcoms...
On top of this experience, my health professions advisor told me explicitly that a neutral or bad rec is no good, and will actually hurt you. Most applicants are having great recs written for them, that is the norm. So when you turn in a neutral one, you could look worse compared to others. Also, my father is on the admissions commitee for the PhD program at a top ten school...he has told me about uninspired recs and the problems they can cause.
Try to find someone to shadow, or a volunteer coordinator, or like you suggested, a professor for a summer course to get to know really well and have them write one. If you're applying for 2009 entering class, you have MAD time. Look at your other recs, figure out if a rec from a prof or doc or someone else will make your app complete, and butter up their ass like crazy until they totally love you and write the best rec ever
😀