When do you assume something is diatomic?

Started by starsweet
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

starsweet

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
So obviously I know BrINClHOF, but Kaplan had a question about the number of molecules in 20 g of oxygen gas. I immediately assumed it was diatomic (esp. since it said "oxygen gas") but the explanation used 16 g/mol to convert the 20 g to molecules. Why did they use 16 g/mol and not 32 g/mol?
 
starsweet said:
So obviously I know BrINClHOF, but Kaplan had a question about the number of molecules in 20 g of oxygen gas. I immediately assumed it was diatomic (esp. since it said "oxygen gas") but the explanation used 16 g/mol to convert the 20 g to molecules. Why did they use 16 g/mol and not 32 g/mol?

Kaplan has a lot, and I mean a lot, or errors and typos. This is a serious problem for doing calculations. I honestly believe that in that problem you should use 32g/mol. Oxygen gas is diatomic.
Oxygen

"Oxygen, O2, is a colourless odourless gaseous main group element which belong to Group VIb of the periodic table.
Atomic Number : 8
Atomic Mass : 15.9994
Melting Point : -214 degC
Boiling Point : -183 degC
Density : 1.429"

Just know Brinclhof 😉
 
I was doing that EXACT same problem yesterday. I used 32 in my calculations but Kaplan said it was 16. That's one thing I hate about Kaplan, all the typos and calculation errors. I mean, you would think Kaplan could afford someone to look over the book before they publish it. It's just annoying b/c your not sure whether your way is the right way or not! I wonder if other study guides (Barrons, Petersons, Princeton, Exam Crackers, Lippencotts, etc) have the same problem with typos and calculation errors.
 
No kidding, it's ridiculous! I may write them a nastygram once this test is over... 🙄

I just didn't want to get a simple problem like that wrong, so I wanted to make sure I was right in using BrINClHOF.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
hi...even i was doing that one last night.....and i asumed it was diatomic...and guess what i was wrong...

But now that u all have clarified it...i'm genious.... 😉 😀 :laugh:
 
ndearwater said:
Kaplan has a lot, and I mean a lot, or errors and typos. This is a serious problem for doing calculations. I honestly believe that in that problem you should use 32g/mol. Oxygen gas is diatomic.
Oxygen

"Oxygen, O2, is a colourless odourless gaseous main group element which belong to Group VIb of the periodic table.
Atomic Number : 8
Atomic Mass : 15.9994
Melting Point : -214 degC
Boiling Point : -183 degC
Density : 1.429"

Just know Brinclhof 😉

What is Brinclhof??????????