you sound like a fair and pro-merit guy. I am pro-merit too.
Some assume that non-US FMG are superior to U.S. IMG. I say, prove it via standardized testing.
But I guess you did not know this,
USMLE - I finally passed! after failing 3 times (some failed Step 6-7 times and still matched).
Please do tell me how is that a meritocracy again? or is it "protectionism" for U.S. students?
In U.S. med school admission, out-of-state students compete for the left-over from in-state students for state medical schools too. Those states say they want to spend their tax money and save those seats for their own people. Nobody seems to have any problem.
Have you heard the proposal for Steps going P/F by the end of this year (2019)? After Steps is going P/F, it will be 100% that U.S. IMG will pick up the left over of AMG. What people are going to be measured on? The schools they went to? The people they know or write them LORs or make calls for them? Is it not "protectionism" for U.S. MD/DO then? or still a meritocracy you say?
U.S. IMG have already only been able to pick the left-over of U.S. MD / DO, no matter how good they are. So how should that any different for U.S. IMG vs non-US IMG?
Many want those "super star" FMG ranked over U.S. IMG. Fine. But the same people would want those "super star" FMG ranked over U.S. MD/DO and take their spots too? Guess not.
Again, I am very for a merit-bases system with no exception with no regards to who you are, where you go to school, age, sex / gender, nationality, religion, etc. Everyone should have to prove themselves via standardized testing to show that they are qualified and be ranked against others to compete for residency spots. I am all for attracting world's talents to this country and they need to prove themselves in the process along with everyone else.
But I think it is very hypocritical of the people who so quickly criticize the U.S. IMG who wants to residency spots for Americans / U.S. citizens only. It is alright to "protect" U.S. MD/DO but it is not ok to protect U.S. IMG over non-US? I guess they forgot to look at themselves in a mirror.
It is common sense that when you are in another people house, you play by their rules. You are at the mercy of the landlord. It is their house, their money, therefore their decision to whether to let you eat or not or the food you could eat. The house owner should decide that and rightfully so. As examples, many countries do NOT let a foreign trained physicians (citizen or not) to ever practice in their country (e.g. Hongkong). I think Congress should have a bill and vote for a law to decide on this matter as how to spend tax money on medical residency / training programs and who would be eligible for and/or preferred to receive this funding / training spots, etc.