Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
While I don't necessarily disagree, the first argument is that a flat tax puts a heavier burden on poor people. That's just from a quick skim and a fast non-economist hot take. I'm sure a smarter economist can should me how it would work and i believe it actually does a positive for GDP, but in simplest terms, even if it were 9% as Herman Cain suggested, the 9% hits a poor person harder than it does you or I. While 9% is really an insignificant rate across the board, can you imagine if you or I's income tax was 9%? Honestly everyone should've voted for Cain for that alone but in reality it's technically "unfair" while also technically being "fair"I don’t understand why we don’t just have a flat rate tax system. For everyone. This would mean that everyone, no matter how rich or poor would contribute equally depending on their income level. And then we can talk about equal access to basic healthcare without the rich complaining that they are subsidizing the “lazy” poor people and the poor people would contribute as well without just taking taking taking. You can’t take forever. Eventually you have to contribute.
I was poor once when I was a kid. We got handouts. But we had insurance thru my dads janitor job and when he finished school we got off the handouts.
That’s one thing I agree with about the republicans. There needs to be a limit to free stuff. A time limit. In order to motivate people.
As far as the illegal immigrants, most of the ones who I knew growing up worked with fake or stolen SSN. Meaning they were contributing taxes that they coukd never use, besides going to the ER for emergencies. The field workers, the nannies... those are the ones making money under the table without paying taxes.