Yes, well, they prefer the term "exotic dancer". Haha.
Yes, absolutely different categories.
LizzyM posed the question "can you be respectful as a physician to" and listed a bunch of occupations that is "sex work" which can mean a lot of things to different people. I guess I should say "sex industry" or "sex entertainment". It's weird to try to categorize these paid activities, some legal, some not.
Webcam, nude pics, phone sex, porn, dancers, escorts, streetwalkers, I must be forgetting something. Adult shops. Doms?
I'm very much against legalized and illegal prostitution, but not so much the rest of it. I guess there's a difference in my mind between the "work" with vs without contact.
Difference in STD risk definitely, but I think any of the rest of it opens people up to assault TBH. I've read some interesting studies about why that would be the case in certain types of work that would seem not to pose greater danger, like sex line.
Speaking as a physician without value judgment, certainly as a matter of public health policy we might debate legal prostitution vs not and impact on STD rates, assault towards prostitution etc, but at the level of the individual I must always recommend fewer partners, always use protection, even if mutually monogamous maybe? (Unless pregnancy desired), and yes, mutually monogamous ideal. Maybe consider sperm washing for pregnancy. Even some forms of non-sexual contact is a bit risky. I've heard of professioner cuddlers. If you are a mutually monogamous cuddler, the risk of transmission of lice, scabies, etc is certainly lower than if you are cuddling 12 clients daily.
There's other issues of course
I dunno, student with eye on the prize vs other reasons people go into sex work, there's differences for sure. Not as many as you would think. As far as history of sexual trauma, I don't know how different that is between dancers in school vs not, I imagine it is higher in the second group as you mentioned simply because anyone not in higher education is at higher risk of marginalization, etc, but I don't know if that's saying much when you look at college sexual assualt stats alone, not to mention the gen pop. Like up to 1/4 women?
TBH there's sort of a rare group doing it in service to education, which isn't too say that the other reasons people go into it aren't equally noble and keep people out of trouble
Some reasons:
Single mom (see that A LOT more than people think)
Self expression
Art
Better wage given the rest of this list:
Flexibility of schedule
Independent contractor
Under the table
Fun
2nd job
There's sorta more squirrelly things I think
Poverty
Supporting bad spending habits
Narcissism
Party culture/rec drug use (even just legal booze)
Poor education
Poor self esteem
Relationship abuse
Sexual trauma
Intimacy issues
The Madonna/Whole complex as they say is certainly an intense issue one faces in any life of sex industry, and that goes for men too.
I'm not convinced that some of the issues around sexual purity, puritan thought, if you will, are to be taken lightly. There's various evidence given what role sex plays in biology for reproduction and relationships, that some degree of desire to restrict sexual activity both individually and as a culture may well arise from that. But I'm a big fan of evolutionary behavior theories.
Sexual stimulation of one sort or another in exhange for resources is a common theme in the animal kingdom at large, so I'm inclined to think ot isn't going anywhere for us as a species.