- Joined
- Aug 19, 2018
- Messages
- 1,639
- Reaction score
- 980
- Points
- 2,226
- Veterinary Student


Don't misrepresent my vote. I am not jumping on "dark" = evil, I'm jumping on someone repeatedly insinuating they have hard evidence that SAR is a wolf + minor feels from previous days (which you can see in my first post of reads on people).I'm leaning v/v on ziggy and coffee who are possibly over-interpreting their information
I'm suspicious of those quickly jumping on the "dark" = evil vote; in order - miz, lawper, jboo, kc
I'm not feeling your lynch but this is some real crap defending imo. I honestly agree with the conclusion that dark does not necessarily mean evil - but early game is all about grabbing at straws. It's not completely unreasonable even if it's not something I'm going to jump on.Am I seriously leading lynch right now because the word "Dark" shows up in my name? Because that is probably the weakest sounding reason to lynch someone of all time and graspy as all hell. Yo @CoffeeQuestionMark wanna explain in a little more detail why you're judging me so hard on a role name when there's no guarantee a role name seer is playing for a village team? Maybe you were worried your name might come again today so you had to throw someone else under the bus and got lucky?
Ok. Can I ask whether you think the knight is a protagonist or an antagonist?I have reasons to strongly believe that the way this plot is going caused the knight to jump out of the air craft, not because any person attacked the knight. I don't want to get into why I know this.
I don't think Lawper can be lynched/is in the gameSo I am historically pretty bad at reading SAR, and when I read both write ups at like 3 am I was so confused I’m assuming based on my delirious state lol, and upon rereading I don’t think I’m just gonna jump on a SAR bandwagon just for the possibility of dark correctly correlating with evil even though we all seem to be forgetting we are in a fluid game per the mod. Also don’t really feel weird about zig, I feel like she’s playing village to me. Coffee is certainly a ? for me.
I don’t like as others have said the quick jumps to lynch SAR without actually feeling sketchy about her play. I Did not like Lawpy going back and forth like that on SAR at all. So for now at least..
Lynch lawpy
wait.... can he?? I am confusedD̵̞̱͕̤̾̈́͑͑́͛4̸̹̿ͅ ̵̡̧̨̘͉͖̖̮͕̲͙̫̽̓͛̇͘͘͝UnƠ̸̙̞͔̟̟̖̰͓̤͚̖͙̂̏̈́̓͂̓̽͛́̂͛͌ͅf̴̺͕̖̉̈f̵̡̲̞̬̩̒̓͋̐̈́̑̄̆͛͋͛͂̌̚͝í̴̢̙̦͍̜̽͑̿́͆́͒̾͘c̷̡̼̞͇̠̻̜̮͓̿͜ĩ̶̗͔̰̜͎̖̹͉̿̑́̿̓̍͛͌͜͝͝ä̴̡͔̮̣̼̙̯͙́̈́̎̌̐͐̄͆̂̓̿l̶̺͎̈͆̾ ̸̢̱̬̩̗̳̖̹̄͆̉̈͂ͅL̴̨̢̯̞̥̪͖̺̼̞̞̫͔͑͒̀͛̏̐͒̓̓͑ͅŷ̵̱̯̝̼̄͑͒̈́̂̚͠n̸̰͕͓̪̫͎̻͂̈́͜͜c̷͖͇̫̯͎͕̘͕̅͌̉̍̕͜h̶̗͉̹̰̣̆̄ ̷̛̛͉̬̦̠̭͍͍̍̓̎̏̓͌̆̀̿́͐̐̽Ţ̷̖̺̼̘̰͆a̶̜͆̿l̵̞̭̯̼̓͌̐̽̑̈́̋̓͛͊̇̎͘l̶̛̜̯̝̬͋̈͒̓͑͌̐̆͊́̉̚y̷̧̧̛͚̤̬̘̗͔̏̀̂̒́̿̇̈́̅̉͜͝
Barks (2) - paws, stagg
sar (5) - koffee, zigjaz, Miz, jboo, kc
Emlady (1) - StartingOverVet
Ziggy (2) - Capri, Lawper
Miz(1) - Mutts
lawpy(1) - Dolphin
Johnnaboo(1) - Trilt
13/28
Ḏ̸͉͕͓̞̦̫̀͂́̿̈́̊̀͋̆͝͝ḝ̴̗̘͔̘̤̱̯͖̄̇̌̉̃̀̐͂̊̔͝a̷̢̮̣̫̦͎͚̯̮̟͖͊͛̽̋̉̑̑̀̀͗͘͘d̷̝̣̞̭̙̼͙̣͎̀̔̒̈̌̕l̶̢̩̤̖̳͈̜̮̩̜͍̠͖̀̔͝i̸͖̻͚̪̣̺̯̓̅̎̀̍̈́͂͝͠ṅ̵̝̦̆̀e̵̟̼̮͈̱̦͈̬̯̒̃̒͛ ̷̛̲̗̩̭͇̝̱̥͙̥̼̟͖͋͑̈́̐͑͑̆̃͘1̸̧̫̝͓̐̓͂͆͒͗̃͂͌͂̕͠͝0̴̧̖̲͍̜̙̤͚̤̐͊̃̇̅̆̓̏͋̆́͜p̶͇̔͊͂͝͝m̵̡̨̬̹͚̞̲̥̫͎̰̿̍̇̀̋̊̓͑͊̀̅̉͝͝ ̴̛̭̯̣̳̮͖͎̥̣̫̱̭͚̜͌̓̌͂̉̉̀̀͐͆̑̈́̚̚ȩ̵̜͔̻̩̼͖͋̽́̿̏̿̈́̑ͅs̵͍͔̲͖̲̘͕̎̑̅̐̈́͊̚̕ͅt̴̡͇̳̩̪͍̰̗̱̓͜ (~6 hrs)
![]()
Today during the glitch anyone who was unknown can be lynchedI don't think Lawper can be lynched/is in the game
wait.... can he?? I am confused
Incorrect, they are the exception to the rule here.Today during the glitch anyone who was unknown can be lynched
lawper is the one person we can't Lynch today?? 😕😱 -_-Incorrect, they are the exception to the rule here.
I have marked it in italics to indicate it is an illegal vote, but placing it on the tally to show that they voted.
lawper is the one person we can't Lynch today?? 😕😱 -_-
Can you? Because I don't think you can reasonably tell a bad role just from seeing good ones. Unless I missed something you have no confirmed antagonistic roles. So unless you suddenly have insight into what those look like, I'm not inclined to take a role seering as an affiliation seering in a game of this type.I have seen other role names and can tell good from bad.
...you have not played enough games lolWhy would a role seer exist if roles were not mostly indicative?
So I am historically pretty bad at reading SAR, and when I read both write ups at like 3 am I was so confused I’m assuming based on my delirious state lol, and upon rereading I don’t think I’m just gonna jump on a SAR bandwagon just for the possibility of dark correctly correlating with evil even though we all seem to be forgetting we are in a fluid game per the mod. Also don’t really feel weird about zig, I feel like she’s playing village to me. Coffee is certainly a ? for me.
I don’t like as others have said the quick jumps to lynch SAR without actually feeling sketchy about her play. I Did not like Lawpy going back and forth like that on SAR at all. So for now at least..
Lynch lawpy
....this is your defense?
I have seen other role names and can tell good from bad.
Why would a role seer exist if roles were not mostly indicative?
I wanted to be a (joking, playful) dick about unnecessary life updatesJust checking in. I’ve been gone all day. Just got home and out of my blues, so I’m gonna spend some time with my kids. Once they’re asleep, I’ll go through and put in a vote.
I wanted to be a (joking, playful) dick about unnecessary life updates
But I also wanted to post a picture of me with a frog I caught while pond sampling today.
So...
You did, but there was a wolf with an extremely visible, named-based on-thread extra kill mechanic, and a villager who was literally named after a saint, among other thingsPretty sure i got a version of a role seer in the ireland game unless i'm confusing the seer types
Omg that frog’s ****ing face.
I have had you at a largely village lean, but something about the timing of your posts today has felt off to me.###unlynch emlady
Lynch SARS. ######
SARS defense is ridiculous. Says nothing and acts upset. Sounds full on wolf to me. Personally i was not convinced by the dark in name idea, but SARS convinced me otherwise.
I haven't done the statistical analysis on my village win stats (my guess is not great) but I did say similar things in my role PM re: SAR just a bit ago. Not eating any hats though so at least there's that 😛That being said, I'm going to laugh if SAR is a wolf, because I put her at strong village on D1, and I found out today from AM what my village win stats are.
Tl;dr: people probably shouldn't be taking my reads too seriously lol
###unlynch emlady
Lynch SARS. ######
SARS defense is ridiculous. Says nothing and acts upset. Sounds full on wolf to me. Personally i was not convinced by the dark in name idea, but SARS convinced me otherwise.
I don't think Lawper can be lynched/is in the game
wait.... can he?? I am confused
Incorrect, they are the exception to the rule here.
I have marked it in italics to indicate it is an illegal vote, but placing it on the tally to show that they voted.
Well that’s a fun non defense you got there. Care to try something else.I like how you have consistently voted me in the past few games even though i've been village.
Oh dang my bad, I misunderstood.
Well that’s a fun non defense you got there. Care to try something else.
Okay then once you’re lynchable again expect a vote from me. Tired of people not explaining themselves and think they can do whatever but say well you’ve been wrong I’ve always been village. Well idk maybe this time you’re a wolf. What kind of statement even is that.nah not really

Okay then once you’re lynchable again expect a vote from me. Tired of people not explaining themselves and think they can do whatever but say well you’ve been wrong I’ve always been village. Well idk maybe this time you’re a wolf. What kind of statement even is that.![]()
I would probably be voting lawps if I could tbh.
Unlynch lawpy
Lynch Barks
I probably won't stop that lynch from happening tbh
Why not?
because i'm getting tired and jaded
I feel that good/well thought out game design really shouldn't have useless roles. Sometimes ones just mostly for entertainment, sure, but not just roles for the sake of roles. But discerning good vs. bad is by far not the only possible use for a role seer so wouldn't assume that...you have not played enough games lol

Seems odd.
Apologize for missing something obvious if I did because I haven’t read through everything today yet, but why barks?
These were your feels yesterday evening-ish when asked but you felt none were strong enough to move off of stagg who was really just an inactivity/less quality posts vote.
Then today you choose to vote Miz based on some of your earlier feelings around the Doggo stuff i believe along with the resistance to Stagg, so the resistance is what pushed the sketchy over the edge to vote for them today as opposed to yesterday? But Stagg is no longer sketchy to you? Because he’s posting more or is the quality better? I’m not saying we shouldn’t try to encourage people to post more I’m just so confused with your logic and you sitting on the Stagg vote yesterday just did not make me feel good.
In that first post I said that I wasn’t ready to vote for ziggy because I usually find her sketchy and I was mostly sideyeing miz at that time because his posts about doggo didn’t make sense and then he said he got her confused with cubs. And then last night and today she started sketching me out even more. I feel better about Stagg today because the quality of his posts have been better than they were before
Also side note I still don’t feel satisfied with Barks response to staying on Stagg and that stuff from yesterday, so could go there again, but I’d rather look into other candidates today.
So I gave some of the quotes below but I can still explain as well, I didn’t like the justification for voting Stagg initially and although Barks has responded to my posts I don’t like the answers if I’m being honest. And I think the core issue of just not having reads and sitting on low post/low quality vote like she did just bothers me. I’m certainly still trying to look at others. I think I’m gonna try and see why people are voting jboo. I haven’t seen much in her posts to make me think wolfy but I definitely could’ve missed something.
That's more what I meantI feel that good/well thought out game design really shouldn't have useless roles. Sometimes ones just mostly for entertainment, sure, but not just roles for the sake of roles. But discerning good vs. bad is by far not the only possible use for a role seer so wouldn't assume that.![]()
Lawp it's only day 4because i'm getting tired and jaded
Uh don't even try. I spend 8+ hours in class. every.day. This isn't half of it.