I wonder if they declined to mention he had a known urea cycle disorder to the members of his medical team who initially evaluated him when he took a turn for the worse post-op, or if that “provider” was just incompetent and in over their head?
Often patients/family don’t mention details they don’t view as important or relevant and if he’s been stable his whole life, never had any major issues related to it, they might not have thought it wasn’t important to bring up. “Any medical issues?” “No doc, he’s healthier than you or me, big time college football recruit.”
If I they had the urea cycle disorder info, the response likely wouldn’t be “yea yea whatever, just tell me what drugs the kid took”. Having that one data point should immediately change the calculus and put some kind of metabolic derangement high on the differential. Sure, also send a UDS, but you can’t anchor on that if you know this piece of his history. Hind sights 20/20, but I’d hope most competent medical providers would think like this.
NOT trying to victim blame here. Just trying to figure how it could have been missed.