- Joined
- Oct 4, 2012
- Messages
- 1,318
- Reaction score
- 5
first, congrats to everyone with an II.
I have not been so fortunate this cycle. I have 0 IIs. Real talk, is this this cycle over for me? should I start thinking about next year?
Its not over, until its over. You should think about next cycle. 🙁
Word.
schools say they offer interviews until April or March. would any interview at this point really just be for the last few spots or just for the wait list?
That just depends on the school. Some would be for the wait list but is that really so bad at this point?
first, congrats to everyone with an II.
I have not been so fortunate this cycle. I have 0 IIs. Real talk, is this this cycle over for me? should I start thinking about next year?
another tuesday.
can't wait till summer. at least then i'll know what's going on with all these silent schools.
Plus then I can finally tell people where I'm going to be next year when they ask! That will be nice.
You only applied to 5 SOMs? Why?
What is your new MCAT score? It sounds like you took it again. Your GPA and listed MCAT are issues. You may need to apply more broadly. Do you have any ties to other states?
You only applied to 5 SOMs? Why?
What is your new MCAT score? It sounds like you took it again. Your GPA and listed MCAT are issues. You may need to apply more broadly. Do you have any ties to other states?
That's not updated. I applied to exactly 30 schools. I have ties to Illinois, Florida, and Michigan.
I agree with you. My pre med profile is an issue especially with my sub par performance in graduate school, which I'm not sure is a "kiss of death" as they say on SDN. ADCOMs have provided we no definitive answer about that.
Personally, I'm trying to put it past me, which I am not sure is so smart. I view it more like it's just something under my belt or "I passed a rigorous one year hard sciences curriculum at a top program." I'm not too keen on taking the MCAT or doing a more formal post bacc. I'm very much looking at the DO. route right now.
Thoughts?
DO is fine.
What is your latest MCAT?
MCAT: 31, GPA: 3.53, PA Resident
Late July/Early August: Submitted and complete
Mid-Sept: I emailed an update letter with some new publications from my research.
I have current statuses that read: continue to review, under review, decision pending, and on hold/re-review from Penn State, Temple, Jefferson, and Drexel respectively.
There's no hope here, right? 🙁 I should give up anticipating any news from any of these schools? I have another acceptance already. I was just hoping for something good from one of these, but it's feeling more and more like silent rejections from all of them. What do you guys think? 😕
Haven't posted here in awhile, but man, I am a nervous wreck as it's getting closer to when I'll hear back from my top choice. People keep telling me about other people they know who also interviewed there, and it just doesn't help to think that I'm kind of in competition with these people. Anyway, thought I'd join in on the panicky solidarity...
Your stats are identical to mine. How many interviews did you get?
I'm pending at all those schools and then some - 13 in total. It's so nerve wracking!
Starting to see a trend. Most of us in waitlist limbo with decent numbers submitted our apps laughably late.
Maybe LizzyM was on to something![]()
Truthfully, it's partly due to a broken system.
Truthfully, it's partly due to a broken system.
Starting to see a trend. Most of us in waitlist limbo with decent numbers submitted our apps laughably late.
Maybe LizzyM was on to something![]()
Truthfully, it's partly due to a broken system.
Agreed! There should be a better way to do this..
How is the system broken?
Another rejection. Top tier private school, didn't expect much.
Now I only have 11 schools to hear back from, and I expect all of them to be rejections (It is February, after all).
But seriously my state school was a huge blow. Although all my friends with ridiculously high GPAs got rejected too. The way they pick people seems so random, especially since those who were chosen for interviews (and I only vaguely know 2 out of the 50 or so people I'm friends with who applied, and neither of those two had remarkable grades or ECs, whereas I have some friends who did awesome things and have insane GPAs who got passed over)
My state school is a top tier school so it's not like they assume those GPA powerhouses would kill their yield if they interviewed them.
I think my biggest blow was from my alma meter. I was above their averages, and my alma meter is known for the "trojan network", always helping eachother out, etc ;/
I think my biggest blow was from my alma meter. I was above their averages, and my alma meter is known for the "trojan network", always helping eachother out, etc ;/
I think my biggest blow was from my alma meter. I was above their averages, and my alma meter is known for the "trojan network", always helping eachother out, etc ;/
I think USC was protecting its yield. Being above its average probably meant to the school that you had other options. Regardless, sorry to hear about that.
I think the whole system is a crap shoot. How do you get an interview at a top tier then rejected by a bunch of lower ranked schools. This process makes no sense to me 😕
I doubt that. This student isn't likely significantly above USC's average. Maybe if he had a 38 or so, then USC might be concerned. However, a 34 from a Calif ORM is probably what is expected.
Edit...just saw the above post with USC's averages. You're right in their averages.
I think my biggest blow was from my alma meter. I was above their averages, and my alma meter is known for the "trojan network", always helping eachother out, etc ;/
I was using US News which reports USC's matriculating class to have an average of a 3.64/33
Though I did go to community college, MANY undergraduates of the UC system/USC come from community college, so I doubt I'm anything new, also my USC GPA has been a 3.8 (Though with only 1 year of coursework, all my prereqs were completed at USC with the exception of Biology and 1 semester of Gen-chem).
I was told, however, that my P.I. does not get along with the USC dean of admission :/
If you're talking about your own situation, there may be some subjective reason that you got an interview at a top tier school. You're an int'l, right? Perhaps you have an interesting story or experience? That subjective reason may not mean much to a lower ranked school.
That said, many of us have gotten rejected or ignored by schools with lower rankings and have gotten IIs and acceptances from higher ranking schools. It's a partly subjective process.
Even with a 34 MCAT, as an Asian male, you're going to be considered to be average or even below average. You're not really competing against the entire app group; you're competing against other male Asians. What is that group's avg stats for USC? MCAT 35? 36? If you were a male URM, your stats might be considered to be very strong for USC.
(Though with only 1 year of coursework, all my prereqs were completed at USC with the exception of Biology and 1 semester of Gen-chem).
I know that many CC students transfer to UCs and USC. I don't know how many go to med school without doing a glide year.
Are you saying that during your junior year at USC, you took Orgo I and II, Gen Chem II, Physics I and II, and Cal I?
Any stats for this? I'm not doubting the claim. Just curious.
All I found was this blurry JPG showing acceptance rates among asian, white, hispanic, and black, although the data in this graph are only tangentially related to the claim at hand-
[/QUOTE]
Combine a dollop of heightened emotions of the panic thread, a heaping of waitlisted/rejected ORM applicants, and sprinkle in AA debate for flavor. Mix and bake for 5 months at 98.7 F. Take out and you should have a cluster**** of a thread.
:troll:
srs
Combine a dollop of heightened emotions of the panic thread, a heaping of waitlisted/rejected ORM applicants, and sprinkle in AA debate for flavor. Mix and bake for 5 months at 98.7 F. Take out and you should have a cluster**** of a thread.
:troll:
srs
I was using US News which reports USC's matriculating class to have an average of a 3.64/33
I was told, however, that my P.I. does not get along with the USC dean of admission :/
https://www.aamc.org/download/321498/data/2012factstable19.pdfAny stats for this? I'm not doubting the claim. Just curious.
I think the whole system is a crap shoot. How do you get an interview at a top tier then rejected by a bunch of lower ranked schools. This process makes no sense to me 😕
If you're talking about your own situation, there may be some subjective reason that you got an interview at a top tier school. You're an int'l, right? Perhaps you have an interesting story or experience? That subjective reason may not mean much to a lower ranked school.
That said, many of us have gotten rejected or ignored by schools with lower rankings and have gotten IIs and acceptances from higher ranking schools. It's a partly subjective process.
Really subjective. The schools I thought I was competitive at I was rejected whereas I got invites from schools I never really thought would interview me. The whole situation is panic inducing when you see you're up against 3.9/ 38 applicants and another day passes with med school silences.
Even with a 34 MCAT, as an Asian male, you're going to be considered to be average or even below average. You're not really competing against the entire app group; you're competing against other male Asians. What is that group's avg stats for USC? MCAT 35? 36? If you were a male URM, your stats might be considered to be very strong for USC.
(Though with only 1 year of coursework, all my prereqs were completed at USC with the exception of Biology and 1 semester of Gen-chem).
I know that many CC students transfer to UCs and USC. I don't know how many go to med school without doing a glide year.
Are you saying that during your junior year at USC, you took Orgo I and II, Gen Chem II, Physics I and II, and Cal I?
Any stats for this? I'm not doubting the claim. Just curious.
All I found was this blurry JPG showing acceptance rates among asian, white, hispanic, and black, although the data in this graph are only tangentially related to the claim at hand-
![]()