D
deleted547339
Fellas, rank lists only.
Penetrating trauma it's not even close. Toledo Hospital (new affiliate of/future home of UT residency) probably gets more blunt trauma with an uptick in penetrating trauma.Mercy St Vincent - Toledo OH... Got the impression more of the trauma came here when compared to Univ of Toledo
Submitted anonymously, via Google Form.
Applicant Summary:
Step 1: 246, Step 2: 269
EM rotations: H/H/H
Medical school region: Everywhere. The IMG struggle is real
Anything else that made you more competitive:
Step Scores, Personality, LOR's & my CV.
Main Considerations in Creating this ROL:
Fit at the program. Opportunists to teach and pursue an EMS fellowship.
1) Washington University
Loved the program & PD. I expected St. Louis to be a small cow town but I really enjoyed the city. Amazing EMS opportunity & a fellowship in house.
2) Sinai Grace- Wayne State
This program is in the hood which make is very appealing for trauma & high acuity patients they see. The residents seemed exhausted but well prepared for anything.
3) Sparrow-Michigan State University
Beautiful hospital, chill residents, great structured program & scribes in your 3rd year. But it's in east lancing.
4) SUNY Upstate
Great program its just in Syracuse
5) Wright State
Opportunity to get involved in disaster medicine & tactical medicine. Its in the middle of nowhere & the residents seemed kinda odd
6) Lehigh Valley Hospital
Its a beautiful hospital, Close to my friends in both Philly & NYC. Not sure how I feel about Allentown.
7) St. Vincent Mercy
I loved the program. I rotated here. However the Interns at the Resident dinner were incredibly open about being racist.
8) Allegiance (Henry ford affiliate in Jackson)
The program is new to MD's, and its in the middle of nowhere but the hospital is nice.
9) NYMC Metro
I would love to stay in NYC but the sacrifices are not worth it. Small ER (15 real beds) No Resus room, paper charts, CT scanner is on the 2nd floor. It felt more like a slightly higher acuity urgent care than anything else.
10) Wyckoff Heights (New EM program in Brooklyn)
The hospital is pretty run down, They are still unsure on the schedule and a lot of other details about the residency program. I think it has great potential but there are too many unknowns to put it higher on my list.
11) Memorial Hospital
New program to MD's unopposed residency. Very small town.
Other:
I applied to 150 programs as an IMG I got rejected from most of them.
Waitlisted at Baylor, U Maryland, U Mississippi, Rejected everywhere else.
I really hope I end up at my top 4.
Conemaugh - couldn't make interview because of schedule. Sorry gamerEMdoc. Truly wanted to make it.
Your original post was unfathomably petty and unprofessional. For those interested: he took offense to being last on a rank list and attempted to shame the student by posting personal emails.Brookdale last? Makes me want to cry. You guys on this website are too much. I hope all of you take what's posted by each other with a grain of salt. It's a lazy Friday and I thought I'd peruse the ROL thread.
Deleting the thread accomplishes nothing and would be a disservice to future applicants. Besides, nothing is truly deleted from the Internet.If I were you, I would be begging the moderator to delete this thread so that future applicants don't see this.
If my intention was to shame the applicant I would not have removed any identifying information and I would not have specifically stated her extremely competitive position on our rank list. If the post did result in such a feeling than I am very very sorry and I am not anonymous on this website. That was not the intention and it is of course difficult at times to interpret what is meant via text as opposed to verbal communication. I do not take offense to our program being last on anyone's rank list. I am grateful we actually made the list. It is better to have finished the race last than to have never even competed. My intention was to provide perspective and to suggest that everyone be careful with what they write as this not as anonymous as everyone might think. Also, nothing negative was written about our program or about me personally. She actually had some very nice things to say via e-mail and sharing these with future potential applicants might be more helpful than their simply seeing us last. I was once in many on this site's same shoes. I know how difficult this process is and my post included some feedback as to how future posts could prove to be more helpful for all those involved. I also try to offer honest feedback and information as it relates to this Match process. I have mentored many students through this ordeal and if there's one thing most have expressed being very grateful for, it's someone being honest and transparent. I am grateful to have been given the opportunity to participate in such a way and those that know and have met me personally even if just on the interview trail or who have taken the time to read other posts that actually have been written about me personally know I am someone who actually cares. Once again, best of luck to everyone in the Match!!!Your original post was unfathomably petty and unprofessional. For those interested: he took offense to being last on a rank list and attempted to shame the student by posting personal emails.
I'm glad I didn't apply to your program, and would strongly advise future applicants to think long and hard about it.
If my intention was to shame the applicant...
...I would not have removed any identifying information
...I would not have specifically stated her extremely competitive position on our rank list.
You are all correct. I screwed up. I own it. I was trying to make a point and that point was not made due to my failure in execution. I was not offended by our position on the ROL. I have been doing this long enough to know that one never truly knows how great a program is unless they experience it as a resident themselves and one never truly knows how great an applicant is until they show up on their doorstep and at the bedside and a great program may not be great for everyone and a great resident may not be as great in every program. That's why we always stress "fit" when it comes to this process. Greatness is not determined by a name or a board score or a position on one's personal or program's list. I should not have included the e-mail and even having done so I could've deleted more information to make it even more anonymous. The purpose of stating her position on our rank list was to make the point of just how crazy this process is especially when one considers the stark contrast in the two positions. I am a staunch medical student and resident advocate and have clearly compromised my position. I should've known better. All I can ask for is the benefit of the doubt that my intention was the antithesis of that which many/most/all appreciated.Ok everyone. While only one of us is able to determine the intent of this PD except he himself, there's a lot of conjecture going on. All identifying information from that post was removed within 15 minutes of posting.
Mistakes were made. From all outward and PM communication, it appears as an honest mistake. I can't change people's opinions, but I can ask that we stop beating the horse for the time being.
Don't EVEN be surprised if none of your residents feel comfortable telling you if they are depressed or gay or having marital troubles.You are all correct. I screwed up. I own it. I was trying to make a point and that point was not made due to my failure in execution. I was not offended by our position on the ROL. I have been doing this long enough to know that one never truly knows how great a program is unless they experience it as a resident themselves and one never truly knows how great an applicant is until they show up on their doorstep and at the bedside and a great program may not be great for everyone and a great resident may not be as great in every program. That's why we always stress "fit" when it comes to this process. Greatness is not determined by a name or a board score or a position on one's personal or program's list. I should not have included the e-mail and even having done so I could've deleted more information to make it even more anonymous. The purpose of stating her position on our rank list was to make the point of just how crazy this process is especially when one considers the stark contrast in the two positions. I am a staunch medical student and resident advocate and have clearly compromised my position. I should've known better. All I can ask for is the benefit of the doubt that my intention was the antithesis of that which many/most/all appreciated.
When your tenure up tho??You are all correct. I screwed up. I own it. I was trying to make a point and that point was not made due to my failure in execution. I was not offended by our position on the ROL. I have been doing this long enough to know that one never truly knows how great a program is unless they experience it as a resident themselves and one never truly knows how great an applicant is until they show up on their doorstep and at the bedside and a great program may not be great for everyone and a great resident may not be as great in every program. That's why we always stress "fit" when it comes to this process. Greatness is not determined by a name or a board score or a position on one's personal or program's list. I should not have included the e-mail and even having done so I could've deleted more information to make it even more anonymous. The purpose of stating her position on our rank list was to make the point of just how crazy this process is especially when one considers the stark contrast in the two positions. I am a staunch medical student and resident advocate and have clearly compromised my position. I should've known better. All I can ask for is the benefit of the doubt that my intention was the antithesis of that which many/most/all appreciated.
No that's a sense of humor that's a perfect "fit" for our program. Unfortunately I suppose not soon enough for everyone.When your tenure up tho??
PM me if you are serious with the post number.How did the PD know who the student was?!
And how do I go about asking for deletion of my previously submitted rol to this thread?
I don't know how many PDs are on the site. This will sound kinda corny but many students are in fact very memorable. They leave an impression. We interviewed 120 candidates this year for our 8 positions. We received 850+ applications. Standing out from the crowd is a must in this process because the competition is fierce. Of course the way one stands out is important. For example, I did not make myself stand out very well on this thread...not good. I remember a lot of our interviewed candidates because I spent a lot of time reviewing their applications and did so multiple times (initial receipt, interview preparation, ROL generation). I think its natural if a PD takes the time to review these lists to look back at their candidates to see if any are on there and where exactly they're ranked. I would suggest not including so much specific information in the candidates summary. I realize it might be helpful for other students to get an idea as to where they think they may comparatively stand but ultimately its a bit of a crap shoot. If PDs are willing to look beyond name brand medical schools, not care so much if someone is a USMG or an IMG, not place too much importance on board scores (yes all these things matter and some more than others) and take the time to really consider letters written on the student's behalf and not just SLOEs because not everyone can get one or get as many as others through no fault of their own and read personal statements, someone might not feel so competitive when they compare themselves to others on the site but they just might be so because of who they appear to be based on their total application and how well they performed on interview day which at least for our program carries the greatest weight of all.How did the PD know who the student was?!
And how do I go about asking for deletion of my previously submitted rol to this thread?
I don't know how many PDs are on the site. This will sound kinda corny but many students are in fact very memorable. They leave an impression. We interviewed 120 candidates this year for our 8 positions. We received 850+ applications. Standing out from the crowd is a must in this process because the competition is fierce. Of course the way one stands out is important. For example, I did not make myself stand out very well on this thread...not good. I remember a lot of our interviewed candidates because I spent a lot of time reviewing their applications and did so multiple times (initial receipt, interview preparation, ROL generation). I think its natural if a PD takes the time to review these lists to look back at their candidates to see if any are on there and where exactly they're ranked. I would suggest not including so much specific information in the candidates summary. I realize it might be helpful for other students to get an idea as to where they think they may comparatively stand but ultimately its a bit of a crap shoot. If PDs are willing to look beyond name brand medical schools, not care so much if someone is a USMG or an IMG, not place too much importance on board scores (yes all these things matter and some more than others) and take the time to really consider letters written on the student's behalf and not just SLOEs because not everyone can get one or get as many as others through no fault of their own and read personal statements, someone might not feel so competitive when they compare themselves to others on the site but they just might be so because of who they appear to be based on their total application and how well they performed on interview day which at least for our program carries the greatest weight of all.
ROLs are already submitted...it really doesn't matter at this point.How did the PD know who the student was?!
And how do I go about asking for deletion of my previously submitted rol to this thread?
How did the PD know who the student was?!
And how do I go about asking for deletion of my previously submitted rol to this thread?
Why would it infuriate a PD if an applicant ranked their program at the bottom of their ROL? Don't PD's also have applicants at the bottom of their ROL?I don't know how many PDs are on the site. This will sound kinda corny but many students are in fact very memorable. They leave an impression. We interviewed 120 candidates this year for our 8 positions. We received 850+ applications. Standing out from the crowd is a must in this process because the competition is fierce. Of course the way one stands out is important. For example, I did not make myself stand out very well on this thread...not good. I remember a lot of our interviewed candidates because I spent a lot of time reviewing their applications and did so multiple times (initial receipt, interview preparation, ROL generation). I think its natural if a PD takes the time to review these lists to look back at their candidates to see if any are on there and where exactly they're ranked. I would suggest not including so much specific information in the candidates summary. I realize it might be helpful for other students to get an idea as to where they think they may comparatively stand but ultimately its a bit of a crap shoot. If PDs are willing to look beyond name brand medical schools, not care so much if someone is a USMG or an IMG, not place too much importance on board scores (yes all these things matter and some more than others) and take the time to really consider letters written on the student's behalf and not just SLOEs because not everyone can get one or get as many as others through no fault of their own and read personal statements, someone might not feel so competitive when they compare themselves to others on the site but they just might be so because of who they appear to be based on their total application and how well they performed on interview day which at least for our program carries the greatest weight of all.
Why would it infuriate a PD if an applicant ranked their program at the bottom of their ROL? Don't PD's also have applicants at the bottom of their ROL?
Why cant we as applicants give valid perceived cons about programs without them flipping out?
And people with lower board scores, non-US medical grads, those without SLOES are all less competitive. They just are. I don't know why you think they shouldn't feel less competitive.
That is TOTALLY true, but, also, as someone who lives in the "real world", it is totally juvenile and petty. Seriously, who gives even one **** about how far down the list one goes? Next year, it's a TOTALLY forgotten thing. Do PDS even discuss this at meetings? Or, alternately, are they that much of losers, that, when they say, "we only went to number 9, for our 8 positions", does that get them laid, or a free drink (that is alcoholic, not a soda)? In other words, trivial.For better or worse, I would imagine that it matters a lot for some PDs for their program to not go down super far on the rank list.
Yes because one post represents all of me. Thanks for the advice.Just stop---it does you a disservice to continue posting.
I suspect odoreater is correct and that I am doing myself a disservice by continuing to post but I have no one to blame but myself so be that as it may I will continue to do so should anyone else also reply to one of my posts asking for clarification or questioning me as you have done. I don't think it would infuriate a PD to see their program at the bottom of an ROL. It sucks for sure but not infuriating. We know we're not a perfect fit and in some instances any fit for everyone. The same is true on your side. We do have applicants at the bottom of our list but interestingly enough our philosophy is very much or should be just like that expressed by Istaretoomuch and that is we do not/should not rank anyone we don't think would be a good fit for our program. I would be more than thrilled to match any of our ranked candidates much like an EM applicant should be more than thrilled to match at any EM program as opposed to no EM program and as every PD knows one's highest matched applicant doesn't always turn out to be their "best" resident.Why would it infuriate a PD if an applicant ranked their program at the bottom of their ROL? Don't PD's also have applicants at the bottom of their ROL?
Why cant we as applicants give valid perceived cons about programs without them flipping out?
And people with lower board scores, non-US medical grads, those without SLOES are all less competitive. They just are. I don't know why you think they shouldn't feel less competitive.
One point I was trying to make with my poorly executed initial post was that I think it would be of great benefit to those applying to actually state these. Our program was ranked last but no cons were stated. I think it would've been more helpful to actually state them and especially so when many other local so called "competing" programs are nearby.
I was one of those less competitive applicants. I was well aware of it. I just don't think it's helpful to those who are to have it thrown in their face. Of course they don't have to log on, read and post themselves so I suppose it simply just is what it is.
Yes because one post represents all of me. Thanks for the advice.
I suspect odoreater is correct and that I am doing myself a disservice by continuing to post but I have no one to blame but myself so be that as it may I will continue to do so should anyone else also reply to one of my posts asking for clarification or questioning me as you have done. I don't think it would infuriate a PD to see their program at the bottom of an ROL. It sucks for sure but not infuriating. We know we're not a perfect fit and in some instances any fit for everyone. The same is true on your side. We do have applicants at the bottom of our list but interestingly enough our philosophy is very much or should be just like that expressed by Istaretoomuch and that is we do not/should not rank anyone we don't think would be a good fit for our program. I would be more than thrilled to match any of our ranked candidates much like an EM applicant should be more than thrilled to match at any EM program as opposed to no EM program and as every PD knows one's highest matched applicant doesn't always turn out to be their "best" resident.
You definitely should feel free to give valid perceived cons about programs and if these are just that no one should flip out. We all know a con for one may be a pro for another. One point I was trying to make with my poorly executed initial post was that I think it would be of great benefit to those applying to actually state these. Our program was ranked last but no cons were stated. I think it would've been more helpful to actually state them and especially so when many other local so called "competing" programs are nearby.
I was one of those less competitive applicants. I was well aware of it. I just don't think it's helpful to those who are to have it thrown in their face. Of course they don't have to log on, read and post themselves so I suppose it simply just is what it is.
Still quite stupid, and NOT a rank list. Just like a person said, what about when another person ranked those places highly?Rest of list:
In no particular order BIDMC, Wisconsin, MCW, Johns Hopkins, UMich, Duke, Resurrection, Rush
Would consider myself a pretty average to below average applicant.
Applicant Summary:
Step 1: 230s, Step 2: 250s
EM rotations: H/H/H
Med school (and rotations) in the Midwest
Not AOA; probably bottom quarter in pre-clinicals, clinical grades pushed me to about the median of my class
3rd grades were a mix of H/HP/P
Very involved in organized medicine at a national level.
Lots of a research in a different field, had a change of heart in 3rd year.
Many comments about strong letters.
My mother had a pretty bad accident and her recovery was long and difficult and really affected me emotionally and academically. I went part time in my second year of medical school to help my family take care of her. Not a true LOA, but bad enough.
Main Considerations in Creating this ROL:
I only applied to 3 year programs in the Midwest.
Ended up wanting a more academic environment.
Pediatric experience is important to me.
I wanted to work with very sick patient populations.
It mattered more how I got along with faculty than residents (it was rare for me to have a bad interaction with residents).
1. Medical College of Wisconsin
(+) Very well run traumas (one of my attendings at an away site was trained there and told me about it), best pediatric experience I've seen on the trail - 60k volume in the Peds ED, Froedert used to be the county hospital and continues to serve the population, beautiful campus
(-) I don't like Milwaukee
2. Mayo
(+) I drank the kool aid, seems like a great place to learn how to deal with very sick people, great work life balance (only two rotations with call), got along with the residents
(-) Rochester is kind of a strange town, I think there is enough to do for fun, but worried about spouse's job opportunities
3. University Hospitals Case Western
(+) New PD and Chair were my favorite people on the trail, great energy from both of them, really felt like home to me, loved Cleveland and NE Ohio in general
(-) Just became a Level I Trauma with anesthesia at the airway (said they would get it to only ED at airway within a year), transitions are scary times to jump into a program, did not care for the old PD who still works there
4. University of Kentucky
(+) Very, very sick population of patients from a large encatchment area, loved Lexington
(-) Kentucky is very conservative, spouse does NOT want to go here
5. Detroit Receiving Hospital Wayne State
(+) Great reputation, really feels like down and dirty ER, great relationship with trauma surgery service, loved Detroit
(-) May be a little too down and dirty with just curtains in between patients (not necessarily my philosophy on patient care), didn't click with the faculty as much as I would have hoped
6. Henry Ford
(+) Again, great reputation, more money than DRH, great academic center with plenty of research and EM big wigs
(-) Not a very good pediatric experience at all (actually gave me a pit in my stomach when they talked about how little they do with kids), hospital was kept up well, but very old fashioned (trivial, I know)
Then my 3 rotations
Rest of list in alphabetical but not rank order (I don't think I'll fall below my rotations):
Beaumont, Mizzou, Nebraska, Penn State, SIU, UT Murfreesboro, Western Michigan
Not ranking:
Summa Akron
Invited, did not attend (due to not wanting to live in that location and having enough interviews):
Presence Resurrection, Advocate Christ, Mercy St. Vincent
Applied to 40 3-year programs in the Midwest, got interviews offers at a total of 20 after withdrawing from 10 in late October before hearing anything back.
Still quite stupid, and NOT a rank list. Just like a person said, what about when another person ranked those places highly?
I still stand by it. Either the list is total bull****, or this person, who spent so much (apparent) time to write it up, shows either a petty streak, or such bad judgment, that they would go out of their way, to increase effort, for no discernable, reasonable, evident, or logical reason.Normally I'd agree with you. However given the event from yesterday I'm giving props to people for still posting their lists.
Good luck to you all.