- Joined
- Jun 2, 2011
- Messages
- 302
- Reaction score
- 158
- Points
- 5,191
- Resident [Any Field]
Sorry for being ignorant - was 2006 like the peak of Radiology competitiveness?hopefully next year ≠ 2006 either.
Sorry for being ignorant - was 2006 like the peak of Radiology competitiveness?hopefully next year ≠ 2006 either.
Which top tier programs? Wonder if some programs are starting to interview DOs when not in the past. Would be good to know for future DOs.
If a DO applicant got 18 interviews with 5 being top tier, this clearly isn’t gonna be another repeat of 2006.
Members do not see ads. Register today.
The FMG struggle is realI'll say that as a DO with even moderate to low board scores I've been very, very happy with the response I've had. Sure, no "top-tier" programs (granted, I applied to very few) but I expect MD candidates with similar numbers would have had a similar or just slightly better response. Unfortunately sounds like IMG/FMG candidates are having a very difficult time potentially to the benefit of DO applicants. Regional biases are also playing heavily into my favor in a DO/residency-dense area.
What just happened to the Google docs spreadsheet?
DO applicant
Steps: 260's
Research: Minimal to none
DR: applied 45, 14 interviews, 2 waitlist, 5 rejections
Intern: applied 15 each TY/Medicine, 4 TY interviews/ 1 waitlist, 5 Prelim med interviews
Transitional year is its own specialty, it's not a preliminary year. And the difference is that you rotate through more departments and has a reputation for being more chill.SO.. I havent really understood the difference between prelim and TY..
In fact, in ERAS when you choose to filter the IM programs, there's no TY option but just prelim.
Can someone give an explanation?
Anyone has hear from methodist - houston ?
Agreed. I haven't had an invite for 26 days and have had maybe 10 rejections since then. Not too convinced there's any more invites other than a few lucky ones trickling in from waitlists.Are programs still sending invites? Do programs tend to send out invites in a staggered fashion? I got several interview invites right away but have had nothing but silence for about the last week or so. Getting a little worried.
Seems like DR is more competitive this year. I'm feeling pretty stupid for not trying to maximize the number of interviews I have. I got 18 invites total but have had to decline like 3 due to schedule conflicts with other interviews. So right now I'm looking at 14 with another possible cancellation. I also only have like 5 prelim IM and 1 TY invites. I applied to ~40 rads programs with only like 3 within the top 20 and applied to 15 IM prelim and 3 TYs. Rejected from 5 programs. Steps: 253/255. Top quartile of class. Weak research though with about three projects: 2 ophtho, 1 rads. no pubs. Good ECs. Meh letters I guess.
First of all that is great, good work. However, I have no idea why people are going on 15 Rads interviews, that is absurd. If you fall out of your top 5 then you really sucked it up. I'm taking 10 interviews for rads and then 6-7 prelims. I have no idea how people do more than this, or even feel the need to do more than this. Radiology is more competitive this year, but it isn't absurdly more competitive. Relax people, if you go on more than 12 rads interviews you're wasting time in my opinion.Seems like DR is more competitive this year. I'm feeling pretty stupid for not trying to maximize the number of interviews I have. I got 18 invites total but have had to decline like 3 due to schedule conflicts with other interviews. So right now I'm looking at 14 with another possible cancellation. I also only have like 5 prelim IM and 1 TY invites. I applied to ~40 rads programs with only like 3 within the top 20 and applied to 15 IM prelim and 3 TYs. Rejected from 5 programs. Steps: 253/255. Top quartile of class. Weak research though with about three projects: 2 ophtho, 1 rads. no pubs. Good ECs. Meh letters I guess.
What are the odds of matching whit a single rad interview and 2 prelims (?)
NRMP says 80% but that’s for US MDs
No, that is incorrect and statistically impossible.Mind you, the chance of people getting their top 3 spots are HIGHER in those who go to more interviews.
The chance of people getting in their top 3 if only 3 interviews were secured is a lot lower.
Can anyone confirm OHSU and/or Utah sent out external DR invites already? The google sheet says yes, but a friend rotating at one of them said he was told no, they haven't.
You're right but I think it's important to emphasize this: there's a big difference between if you applied to a small number of programs because you're geographically restricted or something vs if you only got 3 interviews DESPITE APPLYING BROADLY. The latter doesn't say very good things about how competitive a candidate you are. Yes, in theory, everyone who gets interviews "is on equal footing once they walk in the door" but if you look at the NRMP data people who didn't match ranked about 7 programs, while people who did match ranked about 10-11; this doesn't mean many people matched at spots below 7, but rather that most "match-worthy" candidates got around or more than 10 invites. Getting 3 invites after applying to 5 programs, odds you match may be similar to the odds the average applicant matches in their top 3. Getting 3 invites out of 40 applications is an indication you have a serious red flag and that those 3 programs interviewing you may be assigning you a lower pre-test probability of being ranked well, whether because of IMG status, bad letters or whatever. I hate to be a downer and I don't want to be discouraging, this process is brutal--but I think it's important to be honest and figure out what you can do.No, that is incorrect and statistically impossible.
People who get more invites are more likely to land in their top 3 spots because they are likely better applicants, but going on more interviews doesn't help your odds of landing in your top 3. Going on more mid level interviews when you are sitting on 6 top 20 interviews isn't going to help you at all. Same is true, if you are sitting on 6 top 60 interviews, going on more lower level interviews isn't going to help you. However, attending 100 interviews or 3 interviews, isn't changing anyone's chances at their top 3. Having 100 invites, well that increases your chances because you probably rock. You have a 99% chance of landing in your top 6. I'm not saying that you should interview at 6 places, I'm just saying 15 is excessive.
Out of curiosity, what's a good interview rate? 10 for 40 programs applied? 15? 20? Interested to hear what other people's yield is at this point.You're right but I think it's important to emphasize this: there's a big difference between if you applied to a small number of programs because you're geographically restricted or something vs if you only got 3 interviews DESPITE APPLYING BROADLY. The latter doesn't say very good things about how competitive a candidate you are. Yes, in theory, everyone who gets interviews "is on equal footing once they walk in the door" but if you look at the NRMP data people who didn't match ranked about 7 programs, while people who did match ranked about 10-11; this doesn't mean many people matched at spots below 7, but rather that most "match-worthy" candidates got around or more than 10 invites. Getting 3 invites after applying to 5 programs, odds you match may be similar to the odds the average applicant matches in their top 3. Getting 3 invites out of 40 applications is an indication you have a serious red flag and that those 3 programs interviewing you may be assigning you a lower pre-test probability of being ranked well, whether because of IMG status, bad letters or whatever. I hate to be a downer and I don't want to be discouraging, this process is brutal--but I think it's important to be honest and figure out what you can do.
I totally agree with you, I'm just chuckling a bit about the people who are going on more than 12 interviews but wish they would have taken the 3 or 4 they couldn't fit in their schedule. I completely agree with your last post. Again, I'm going on 10 DR interviews, could have gone on more, and will go on more if a program I'm sincerely interested in invites me. I'm not wasting time and resources on another mid-lower tier program when I already know I'm going to rank them below 7, what is the point, there is greater than a 90% chance I rank in my top 5. I assume that goes for everyone with 10 or more interviews. Just relax everyone.You're right but I think it's important to emphasize this: there's a big difference between if you applied to a small number of programs because you're geographically restricted or something vs if you only got 3 interviews DESPITE APPLYING BROADLY. The latter doesn't say very good things about how competitive a candidate you are. Yes, in theory, everyone who gets interviews "is on equal footing once they walk in the door" but if you look at the NRMP data people who didn't match ranked about 7 programs, while people who did match ranked about 10-11; this doesn't mean many people matched at spots below 7, but rather that most "match-worthy" candidates got around or more than 10 invites. Getting 3 invites after applying to 5 programs, odds you match may be similar to the odds the average applicant matches in their top 3. Getting 3 invites out of 40 applications is an indication you have a serious red flag and that those 3 programs interviewing you may be assigning you a lower pre-test probability of being ranked well, whether because of IMG status, bad letters or whatever. I hate to be a downer and I don't want to be discouraging, this process is brutal--but I think it's important to be honest and figure out what you can do.
Mind you, the chance of people getting their top 3 spots are HIGHER in those who go to more interviews.
The chance of people getting in their top 3 if only 3 interviews were secured is a lot lower.
Ok so I applied broadly (fmg requiring a visa-142 rad programs and 100 prelims) I got one rad and 2 prelims IV.
According to ecfgm-nrmp 2016 data people with one contiguous rank have around 40% matching rate and only 11 out of 44 (25% ) matched on that year (2016).
I'm disappointed I always wanted to be a radiologist, but numbers are not in my favor.
So chances are I match to both prelims and advance, partially matched (only prelim) and not matching.
Im also applying to radiology in Spain through MIR, but its not even close as good as going to an American residency.
So right now I'm seriously considering taking a prelim and re-apply (maybe to other specialty) or go through Spaniard residency and see if I can get the alternate pathway of the ABR or just using my Spaniard degree to move to UK, AU or NZ.
Well I think the money they pay as a PGY1 is enough to re apply.I am also an IMG, so maybe my advice may not be as good but, if you dont match to an advanced position you can always do a preliminary year and reapply next year. I understand some places can offer an extension of your preliminary year, and once here, with US lors and experiences you should get more interviews next year
Ok so I applied broadly (fmg requiring a visa-142 rad programs and 100 prelims) I got one rad and 2 prelims IV.
According to ecfgm-nrmp 2016 data people with one contiguous rank have around 40% matching rate and only 11 out of 44 (25% ) matched on that year (2016).
I'm disappointed I always wanted to be a radiologist, but numbers are not in my favor.
So chances are I match to both prelims and advance, partially matched (only prelim) and not matching.
Im also applying to radiology in Spain through MIR, but its not even close as good as going to an American residency.
So right now I'm seriously considering taking a prelim and re-apply (maybe to other specialty) or go through Spaniard residency and see if I can get the alternate pathway of the ABR or just using my Spaniard degree to move to UK, AU or NZ.
I think most people have a yield of 30-50% (invites per application), looking at the spreadsheet and talking to people. Even for really competitive applicants, since lower tier programs usually won't interview people they don't think will rank them. Personally I applied to more or less 30 IR and DR and got about 15 invites.Out of curiosity, what's a good interview rate? 10 for 40 programs applied? 15? 20? Interested to hear what other people's yield is at this point.
(Obviously it depends on the mix of programs you applied to, like if you applied to the top 40 programs in the country you will have a lower yield. But assuming you broadly applied.)
Radiology all the way 🙂I would say think carefully what your actual goals are. Do you want to practice in US no matter what? Or do you want to do radiology no matter what?
Depending on this, it will shape your pathway as to what to do and save you the most amount of time and money.
Radiology all the way 🙂
I think most people have a yield of 30-50% (invites per application), looking at the spreadsheet and talking to people. Even for really competitive applicants, since lower tier programs usually won't interview people they don't think will rank them. Personally I applied to more or less 30 IR and DR and got about 15 invites.