• Hi! The search index is currently updating, search results will not include the full scope of the forums until it is complete.

2019-2020 UCLA (Geffen)

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
For anyone who has already had their interview: at what time did the interviews end? I'm currently OOS and am trying to plan my departing flight. Thank you in advance!
 
eys808777 said:
For anyone who has already had their interview: at what time did the interviews end? I'm currently OOS and am trying to plan my departing flight. Thank you in advance!
Click to expand...
I interviewed on a weekday and wrapped up around 4pm. With LA traffic picking up around that time, I would budget 1-1.5 hours to get to LAX.
Cant speak to weekend interviews
 
Mr.Wick said:
I interviewed on a weekday and wrapped up around 4pm. With LA traffic picking up around that time, I would budget 1-1.5 hours to get to LAX.
Cant speak to weekend interviews
Click to expand...
Thanks so much! Definitely nervous but also excited. Hope your interview went well!
 
It’s been quiet with the interviews. Does anyone know if UCLA has sent out all the invites?
 
Laix said:
there's a lot more to go. according to the tour guide sign-up sheet we are interviewing to late Nov so far, maybe there gonna be more after that.
Click to expand...

Is there a separate thing to sign up for besides choosing our interview dates? I dont think I signed up for tour guide date.. yet
 
ObjectiveBoba said:
Do you know if UCLA only interviews until November? I happened to click onto that page and I was a bit surprised by how compressed UCLA's interview season is.
Click to expand...

That seems to be the case based on their website but I would think it's def against the norm if a school wrapped up their interviews sooo early in the cycle.
Or since they have rolling admissions, they could keep reviewing applications .. as they say.. "until class is filled" which may extend past Nov
 
Engrailed said:
That seems to be the case based on their website but I would think it's def against the norm if a school wrapped up their interviews sooo early in the cycle.
Or since they have rolling admissions, they could keep reviewing applications .. as they say.. "until class is filled" which may extend past Nov
Click to expand...

My thought is that they wouldn’t indicate Nov unless they were actually actively making efforts to end earlier. This is in the context of basically every other school claiming they end in Jan, Feb, Mar, or even Apr.
 
Fruitjuice said:
My thought is that they wouldn’t indicate Nov unless they were actually actively making efforts to end earlier. This is in the context of basically every other school claiming they end in Jan, Feb, Mar, or even Apr.
Click to expand...

Yeah, well in that case, UCLA must be stacking interviews a lot between now and Nov if they intend on getting through to everyone. I wonder how many II have been sent out
 
Engrailed said:
Yeah, well in that case, UCLA must be stacking interviews a lot between now and Nov if they intend on getting through to everyone. I wonder how many II have been sent out
Click to expand...

Yeah, I’m wondering how they’re approaching admissions this year. Late August to November interviews seems like a short season. Perhaps their new approach to admissions is to just admit a bunch of high stats and 3 first-author publications type ECs. You don’t need a long cycle for that.
 
Fruitjuice said:
Yeah, I’m wondering how they’re approaching admissions this year. Laste August to November interviews seems like a short season. Perhaps their new approach to admissions is to just admit a bunch of high stats and 3 first-author publications type ECs. You don’t need a long cycle for that.
Click to expand...

UCLA is more holistic than the other T20s, no?
 
High stats don’t necessarily get II from UCLA despite others T10 II success.
Still hoping.
 
Engrailed said:
UCLA is more holistic than the other T20s, no?
Click to expand...

I’ve never really kept up on their “trends” tbh. Perhaps their talks regarding raising their MCAT cutoff is a signal that they will start prioritizing stats and top-tier ECs. Remember, “holistic” doesn’t mean you can slack off in any part of your app. Perfect stats, perfect service, perfect research, perfect leadership = holistic too

To view in a cynical way, making admissions more “holistic” is just like adding more sections to the MCAT. Suck at CARS? You can still do well in the 10 other sections. Great! But if you’re trying to get to the upper echelon of scores, adding more sections just means more sections you have to be perfect in, more hoops to jump through, more challenges to overcome. (Some may argue a more holistic admissions process doesn’t necessarily benefit disadvantaged applicants more than a stats driven process)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
On the timeline it says they recommend that we we are complete before Sep 1 and that interviews last until November. How strict are they to these dates? Also, what are the current dates available for interview.
 
Last edited:
when have interview dates been for the most recent batch of invites?
 
ssp3 said:
On the timeline it says they recommend that we we are complete before Sep 1 and that interviews last until November. How strict are they to these dates? Also, what are the current dates available for interview.
I was complete early August, so I’m a bit worried my app won’t even be looked at.
Click to expand...

Im not sure on how strict they are but applications are not always viewed in order so I dont think your early aug submission hampers your chances solely bc of the timestamp
 
Anyone else hoping this means people who interviewed in August/early September may actually hear on/around Oct 15th? This would be great.
 
~Uncle Iroh~ said:
There is some kind of screening...I previously thought it was holistic but not sure if it's numbers-based or holistic
Click to expand...

No II here, so this is not meant to brag, but based on personal experience I think there must be some sort of “auto-send” based on numbers (unbalanced LizzyM here with 524+ MCAT) because I received the secondary within hours of submitting primary. Others who were concerned about passing the stat screen have still received, but often after more of a delay, so my guess is that a manual review led to those. So in short, I think it’s both, but with holistic obviously taking longer.
 
Engrailed said:
Yes it’s still a thing, at least based on what i read from last year’s ucla threads
Click to expand...

Is there any data available for the students who received it? It know it says top 20%, but what are we talking here? 4.0 / 525+? And is "merit" purely educational or does that account for life experiences?
 
CaptainPoopyPants said:
Is there any data available for the students who received it? It know it says top 20%, but what are we talking here? 4.0 / 525+? And is "merit" purely educational or does that account for life experiences?
Click to expand...

Im not sure, but if you get to find out, please let us know!
 
CaptainPoopyPants said:
Is there any data available for the students who received it? It know it says top 20%, but what are we talking here? 4.0 / 525+? And is "merit" purely educational or does that account for life experiences?
Click to expand...
On last year’s thread there were some “low stats” people who received the scholarship. But what difference does it make? Don’t expect to get one. Be thrilled if you do.
 
EmbryonalCarcinoma said:
On last year’s thread there were some “low stats” people who received the scholarship. But what difference does it make? Don’t expect to get one. Be thrilled if you do.
Click to expand...

In general, do they have a lot of nee-based financial aid (similar to private instituions)?
 
CaptainPoopyPants said:
Because I make decisions by considering the odds of different outcomes. Knowing the statistical makeup of recipients would help in that decision making process.
Click to expand...
There is no reliable way to predict your chances of getting the scholarship. These kinds of things are super subjective. Also, the scholarship committee is separate from the admissions committee.
 
EmbryonalCarcinoma said:
There is no reliable way to predict your chances of getting the scholarship. These kinds of things are super subjective. Also, the scholarship committee is separate from the admissions committee.
Click to expand...

Sure, but I'm not certain exactly what your point is. Having more information can't be a bad thing. Getting accepted into any specific medical school is a subjective process, but you still apply to schools that you are most likely to get into based on statistical information. I'm asking for more information to help me make life changing decisions. So?
 
CaptainPoopyPants said:
Sure, but I'm not certain exactly what your point is. Having more information can't be a bad thing. Getting accepted into any specific medical school is a subjective process, but you still apply to schools that you are most likely to get into based on statistical information. I'm asking for more information to help me make life changing decisions. So?
Click to expand...
EmbryonalCarcinoma said:
There is no reliable way to predict your chances of getting the scholarship. These kinds of things are super subjective. Also, the scholarship committee is separate from the admissions committee.
Click to expand...

Knowledge is power 🙂
 
CaptainPoopyPants said:
Because I make decisions by considering the odds of different outcomes. Knowing the statistical makeup of recipients would help in that decision making process.
Click to expand...

You should prob make decisions based on the actual outcomes, not the chance of the outcomes.
Pt come to the ED showing all signs of a brain bleed, he has a high chance of brain bleed, are you gonna page neuro right the way and asking for an operation? No. You need to obtain the evidence first.

You'll get/not get geffen when you are accepted, then you can make your decisions.
Even if you don't get Geffen, there are so many other internal scholarships.
 
Last edited:
CaptainPoopyPants said:
Sure, but I'm not certain exactly what your point is. Having more information can't be a bad thing. Getting accepted into any specific medical school is a subjective process, but you still apply to schools that you are most likely to get into based on statistical information. I'm asking for more information to help me make life changing decisions. So?
Click to expand...
The point is there is no way to know. None of us can tell you how likely it is you’ll receive the scholarship. Even if we could, how would your actions change if your chances were 10% as opposed to 5%? Do your best and hope for the best.
 
Laix said:
You need to obtain the evidence first.
Click to expand...

As in... you need more information first. Which is what I'm asking for lol.

EmbryonalCarcinoma said:
The point is there is no way to know. None of us can tell you how likely it is you’ll receive the scholarship. Even if we could, how would your actions change if your chances were 10% as opposed to 5%?
Click to expand...

Just as there is no way to know if a medical school will accept you. But you still gather INFORMATION to help you decide which schools you apply to. Yes, if I had the proper information I would know if I at least have some chance of the scholarship vs. no chance of the scholarship. And yes, I am making decisions based on that. LA is expensive and if I feel as though I have no chance at the scholarship then I'd rather not go to the interview. But honestly, it seems like you're just being argumentative. I simply asked if data was available. Either that data is or isn't. What do you care?
 
idonutknow said:
Interview received this evening - Secondary submitted mid July but committee letter was not sent in until 8/9
As a non-canadian international applicant this is quite reassuring to me...
Click to expand...
Congrats! What dates were available? Are they for sure only scheduling through November?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top