APPIC Interview Invitation Thread (2021)

Started by psykhe
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
spacegiraffe said:
Starting to wonder about hearing back on the federal follow-ups - have you received anything from your site yet? Mine was FMC Devens and I have not heard anything. Would they notify us if they decided not to move forward with the interview?
Click to expand...
I haven’t heard anything yet—someone in the thread suggested that based on last year, we may not hear until next week.
 
spacegiraffe said:
Starting to wonder about hearing back on the federal follow-ups - have you received anything from your site yet? Mine was FMC Devens and I have not heard anything. Would they notify us if they decided not to move forward with the interview?
Click to expand...
In the past, I think it's been 11/30ish when they change the status on USA Jobs. I read that it went from "received" to "referred" (hopefully- if we get placed in Best Qualified). I've been checking and they have not don't that yet this year :/ But yes, I'm sure they would let us know if/when/how to proceed.
 
I received an invite to interview that said they would be sending out a link to schedule a time and if not interest in interviewing to email them back.

I am interested in interviewing and didn’t know if it would be appropriate to email back thanking them for the offer to interview and a quick line about looking forward to it or if I should just wait for the scheduling email?
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
spacegiraffe said:
Starting to wonder about hearing back on the federal follow-ups - have you received anything from your site yet? Mine was FMC Devens and I have not heard anything. Would they notify us if they decided not to move forward with the interview?
Click to expand...
I have not heard back yet. If you sign in on the usajobs.gov site, and then click on additional application information until you get redirected to the federal prison portal on their monster website, you can see the status of your application. Right now mine still says vacancy applications are still being processed. From my understanding, this means I'm still under consideration. It will update once they have made a decision and say something about whether or not I'm still under consideration - I'm forgetting what exactly it will say at the moment but hopefully that helps?? Good luck! fingers crossed!!!
 
Official Site Name: Child and Adolescent Services (CAS) Multicultural Clinical Training Program/ University of California, San Francisco/ Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital / Department of Psychiatry
Date Invitation Received: 11/ 24 - invitation with no dates; 11/25 - invitation with dates
Method of Invitation (Phone call, personal/mass email, Snapchat): personal email
Specialty Track or Site (e.g., for consortiums): Adolescent Mental Health Track
Interview Dates Offered: Too many to list. December and January. One hour time slots.
(In honor of years past) If & How you're staying sane: Reading this forum!

Official Site Name: Duke University Medical Center / Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences
Date Invitation Received: 11/24
Method of Invitation (Phone call, personal/mass email, Snapchat): personal email
Specialty Track or Site (e.g., for consortiums): Didn't specify which track in invite but I only applied for the Child track (trauma)
Interview Dates Offered: 1/8 and 1/15
(In honor of years past) If & How you're staying sane: Painting!

Rejection from Allegheny General Hospital on 11/24
 
inpursuitphdpsych said:
I have not heard back yet. If you sign in on the usajobs.gov site, and then click on additional application information until you get redirected to the federal prison portal on their monster website, you can see the status of your application. Right now mine still says vacancy applications are still being processed. From my understanding, this means I'm still under consideration. It will update once they have made a decision and say something about whether or not I'm still under consideration - I'm forgetting what exactly it will say at the moment but hopefully that helps?? Good luck! fingers crossed!!!
Click to expand...
Thanks so much for your help, good luck to you too!!!
 
Official Site Name: University of Pittsburgh Counseling Center
Date Invitation Received: 12/03/2020
Method of Invitation (Phone call, personal/mass email, Snapchat): Personal email
Specialty Track or Site (e.g., for consortiums): n/a
Interview Dates Offered:TBD
(In honor of years past) If & How you're staying sane: Cake is a good one. 🙂 Netflix, phone calls with friends and family, sporadic workouts.

Rejection from University of British Columbia today (12/4/20)

Rejection from University of California - Berkeley on 12/2.
 
Official Site Name: St. Cloud VA
Date Invitation Received: 12/2
Method of Invitation (Phone call, personal/mass email, Snapchat): Phone Call
Specialty Track or Site (e.g., for consortiums): General
Interview Dates Offered: 1/11, 1/15, 1/20 (morning or afternoon slots)
(In honor of years past) If & How you're staying sane:

and I didn't see anyone do the format for this but
Official Site Name: Eastern Oklahoma VA
Date Invitation Received: 11/20
Method of Invitation (Phone call, personal/mass email, Snapchat): Email
Specialty Track or Site (e.g., for consortiums): General
Interview Dates Offered: 1/6 & 1/12
(In honor of years past) If & How you're staying sane: Crying to my dissertation chair and mainlining coffee
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
2blackcats said:
Hi! I say this very sincerely... I have a strong reaction to the statement "I should be getting more research" from students and the inclination to tell them that they have it better than others. I am in a clinical phd program like this, and it has backfired and set the program back in a lot of ways. This is the type of mindset that myself and many rising academics I know are actively fighting against. It's toxic and is often counterproductive.

I have a background in business management and at the end of the day, research labs, clinics, departments and academia as a whole is a business (which is not a bad thing). There is good theory and research on how to manage "workers" in a way that preserves their dignity and autonomy, and encourages intrinsic motivation for productivity without using shame. As someone trained under the clinical science model, I choose to follow the research. I think we, the field, can do better.
Click to expand...
I wanted to reply to this and then I will let this thread get back on track 🙂. I was being a bit sarcastic and will not actually tell my students that, but it's also the case that academics are typically pretty driven people and for me, at least, I find myself getting frustrated a lot with student productivity levels. I'm not a senior person so I imagine it depends on your career level/the students you attract, and I do try to be sensitive to the fact that students have a variety of things on their plates and dont work 100% on research (that's what postdocs are for 🙂). Plus now we've got the pandemic on top of everything else. I've tried to follow good people management practices (which you don't learn in grad school...) and I find that this is good for dynamics in the lab and my relationships with trainees, but still doesn't get their productivity to the level I would want.

I appreciate the student perspective and the push back against a hyperintense productivity culture, but I also want to warn future academics that my experience has been that I enjoy mentoring students but that I still feel like I'm doing a lot of the heavy lifting for all of our research productivity and I wish I was seeing more from the students. Perhaps this will improve as I continue to learn how to manage a lab, but those of you who are very ambitious and excited to start your own lab...be aware that there's a lot of frustration because a lot of people can't live up to your standards, at least not for a while.
 
kayfay89 said:
Anyone heard from the VA Maine or Robley Rex VA in Louisville Kentucky yet? Deadline for date notifications is tomorrow and I am waiting in anxious fear and anticipation.
Click to expand...
All I’ve received so far is a “save a date” for an open house for Robley Rex VA. 🤷🏻‍♀️
 
AlmostaPhD said:
I wanted to reply to this and then I will let this thread get back on track 🙂. I was being a bit sarcastic and will not actually tell my students that, but it's also the case that academics are typically pretty driven people and for me, at least, I find myself getting frustrated a lot with student productivity levels. I'm not a senior person so I imagine it depends on your career level/the students you attract, and I do try to be sensitive to the fact that students have a variety of things on their plates and dont work 100% on research (that's what postdocs are for 🙂). Plus now we've got the pandemic on top of everything else. I've tried to follow good people management practices (which you don't learn in grad school...) and I find that this is good for dynamics in the lab and my relationships with trainees, but still doesn't get their productivity to the level I would want.

I appreciate the student perspective and the push back against a hyperintense productivity culture, but I also want to warn future academics that my experience has been that I enjoy mentoring students but that I still feel like I'm doing a lot of the heavy lifting for all of our research productivity and I wish I was seeing more from the students. Perhaps this will improve as I continue to learn how to manage a lab, but those of you who are very ambitious and excited to start your own lab...be aware that there's a lot of frustration because a lot of people can't live up to your standards, at least not for a while.
Click to expand...
I appreciate the distinction between those who can or even want to work hard and those who don't. Also, I know I am very hard working in certain ways but work differently than others (my former advisor, a bit of a task master, for example). I think it is interesting to see what positions people get themselves in (student) or expect from a student (advisor/investigators), recognizing that there is a span of circumstances, approaches, personalities, abilities, priorities, etc. I can imagine how frustrating it would be to have people working under you who you experience as under-invested/otherwise prioritized, when you are doing so much "heavy lifting" toward certain aims. That being said, I am in a clinically-driven program (not research), and haven't thought a whole lot about the degree to which people who pursue heavier research paths are truly there for the research.
 
Official Site Name: VA Eastern Colorado Psychology Internship Program (Rocky MTN Regional VA Medical Center)
Date Invitation Received: 12/3
Method of Invitation: Email. Was addressed to me.
Specialty Track or Site (e.g., for consortiums): General track.
Interview Dates Offered: 1/4, 1/11, 1/25.
If & How you're staying sane: Netflix, my dog, and commiserating with friends lol.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Anyone receive official rejections from Children's Mercy or Baylor College of Medicine/texas children's yet? Invites went out weeks ago but I have yet to receive a rejection
 
inpursuitphdpsych said:
Official Site Name: Ohio Psychology Internship
Date Invitation Received: 12/4
Method of Invitation: Personal email
Specialty Track or Site (e.g., for consortiums): Forensic track
Interview Dates Offered: asked me about several different weeks in January and to send back my general availability
Click to expand...
Has anyone heard back from the inpatient track?
 
psychmbr08 said:
I received an invite to interview that said they would be sending out a link to schedule a time and if not interest in interviewing to email them back.

I am interested in interviewing and didn’t know if it would be appropriate to email back thanking them for the offer to interview and a quick line about looking forward to it or if I should just wait for the scheduling email?
Click to expand...
I think it would be fine either way.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
ccpsych16 said:
Official Site Name: North Florida/Southern Georgia VA
Date Invitation Received: 12/4
Method of Invitation: Mass email
Specialty Track or Site (e.g., for consortiums): General
Interview Dates Offered: 1/5, 1/12, 1/13, 1/19
If & How you're staying sane: I have interviews every day next week, so I will be prepping for those!
Click to expand...
Congrats! So cool that I watched your post pop up as soon as I submitted mine. Good luck and awesome (although maybe anxiety-provoking) that you have some interviews to prep for 🙂
 
hsiren said:
Congrats! So cool that I watched your post pop up as soon as I submitted mine. Good luck and awesome (although maybe anxiety-provoking) that you have some interviews to prep for 🙂
Click to expand...
I noticed yours right away too lol! Thank you, and I look forward to possibly virtually bumping into you on an interview day!
 
AlmostaPhD said:
I wanted to reply to this and then I will let this thread get back on track 🙂. I was being a bit sarcastic and will not actually tell my students that, but it's also the case that academics are typically pretty driven people and for me, at least, I find myself getting frustrated a lot with student productivity levels. I'm not a senior person so I imagine it depends on your career level/the students you attract, and I do try to be sensitive to the fact that students have a variety of things on their plates and dont work 100% on research (that's what postdocs are for 🙂). Plus now we've got the pandemic on top of everything else. I've tried to follow good people management practices (which you don't learn in grad school...) and I find that this is good for dynamics in the lab and my relationships with trainees, but still doesn't get their productivity to the level I would want.

I appreciate the student perspective and the push back against a hyperintense productivity culture, but I also want to warn future academics that my experience has been that I enjoy mentoring students but that I still feel like I'm doing a lot of the heavy lifting for all of our research productivity and I wish I was seeing more from the students. Perhaps this will improve as I continue to learn how to manage a lab, but those of you who are very ambitious and excited to start your own lab...be aware that there's a lot of frustration because a lot of people can't live up to your standards, at least not for a while.
Click to expand...
That makes a lot of sense, thank you for the clarification and perspective! 🙂 I can imagine how frustrating it would be to not be able to rely on your students like you wish you could. And I definitely value having a high degree of research productivity as well.

I pushed back on your comment because academia has historically relied on using fear (“publish or perish”), shame, guilt, comparison etc. to motivate students to meet demands (as I’m sure you are aware of too!). That may work for some people, but I’m also hoping that we can start to adopt more positive and rewarding ways of motivation that are adaptive and long-lasting (and that would hopefully result in a climate that attracts and sustains a more diverse field of professionals).
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
Postdoc Interview Invitation Thread 2025-2026/2027
Replies
8
Views
9K
BendDontBreak
B
A
APPIC 2025-2026 Interview Thread and Sheet
Replies
25
Views
29K
PsychPsychBaby
PsychPsychBaby
H
APPIC Match Phase II (2026/27)
Replies
34
Views
4K
WisNeuro
WisNeuro
L
  • Locked
APPIC Cover Letter Air Force
Replies
3
Views
2K
Litegreenout123
L
abouttobeadoctor
APPIC Internship Phase II Interview & Support Thread (2024)
Replies
7
Views
5K
theSteppenwolf
theSteppenwolf