The MCAT doesn't test everything you learn in college, which further proves my point. The only criteria an ADCOM has is GPA and MCAT and to say one 36 is better than another 36 based on where they went to UG puts students from less prestigious schools at a terrible disadvantage. I attend a top 20 research school and I still take this stand.
How can you possibly argue student at XYZ had more time to prep for MCAT? How could you even try to prove which course load is easier? It would take an investigation of not only each and every class, but each and every professor, test, grading style, curve, extra credit, lecture style, amount of info taught vs amount of info tested, which book was used, number of students in the class.... take all of this from each class and line it up and compare it student to student.
The only data you can use is students at Harvard are smarter because they have a higher SAT score, WHICH IS A STANDARDIZED EXAM and then you will turn around and say the MCAT (A STANDARDIZED EXAM) does not show that a 36 from the ivy's matches a 36 from North Dakota.