D
deleted1111261
Yes, FMV is largely BS. For their to be a legal case, they have to be paying you above what you bring in based on you making up the difference referring patients elsewhere in house. But it doesn't really matter. They are going to pay you what someone will take. The "excuse" of why they can't go higher doesn't matter, it's just insulting, that's all. Everyone would be wise to avoid engaging on the FMV/stark strawman. They just are saying no to your salary request, that's all, and want to act like it's out of their hands.
Spencer, IA was advertising 850k salary, 10 weeks PTO, and 200k sign-on for a while. All of that turned out to be false. Rad onc ads almost always state "competitive compensation per MGMA guidelines" So we have to play this stupid game of acting interested at any price before getting an offer and trying to negotiate. Whereas in a healthy market, we would just say "sounds, great, I'm interested, here is my fee for my professional services."
WIth regards to the academic satellite thing, I have tried to reject their "faculty appointment" in the past (for a full time clinical very far away from the main site position) and request to be paid as a staff (non-academic) physician. That request resulted in the job offer being pulled as simply asking was considered unprofessional and lacking dedication to the academic mission. So dumb.
The offer was pulled? I have requested many, many things in my contracts, majority have been rejected. Many have been much more broader than what you asked. You run in fascinating circles! The administrators seem like comic book villains!