AWWARDS 2021

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Leaving my memes here for reference
1640449267826.jpeg
1640449285140.jpeg
 
I hope RvB gets some best game noms/votes (I can do neither since it counts as self-nom and apparently autocannibalism is bad?). This is not for self congratulatory reasons but because it was one of the most entertaining games I was a part of this year with excellent performances by the players on all sides.


Thanks for coming to my Ted talk
I don't know how I feel about this one. It really felt like all the wolves except one player got super **** on during the game and also every time after it gets brought up.

Similar with BioShock. But wolves actually lost that one so ****ting on the wolf team that played that game feels a little different to me compared to how it all happened in RvB.
 
I don't know how I feel about this one. It really felt like all the wolves except one player got super **** on during the game and also every time after it gets brought up.
I don't remember you guys getting **** on? I mean, I'm halfway through rereading the game thread, so maybe I just haven't seen it yet. Samac got a lot of (well deserved) praise at the end but that's not the same thing as the rest of the pack getting **** on.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I already sent this nomination to AM so not a reminder for myself, but I don't know how the oddly specific awwards work in terms of whether they also need 2 nominations to get on the ballot or not. So someone join me in nominating Dina for most likely to rand a JOAT role, since she was a JOAT 3 games in a row, pls.

unless @kaydubs already did?
 
I already sent this nomination to AM so not a reminder for myself, but I don't know how the oddly specific awwards work in terms of whether they also need 2 nominations to get on the ballot or not. So someone join me in nominating Dina for most likely to rand a JOAT role, since she was a JOAT 3 games in a row, pls.

unless @kaydubs already did?
Way ahead of you 😉
 
I already sent this nomination to AM so not a reminder for myself, but I don't know how the oddly specific awwards work in terms of whether they also need 2 nominations to get on the ballot or not. So someone join me in nominating Dina for most likely to rand a JOAT role, since she was a JOAT 3 games in a row, pls.

unless @kaydubs already did?
How closely are we sticking to the definition of "rand" :laugh:
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad