Lynching? If there are no items and we can't count on roles, then the only way to find out if someone is who they say they are is to lynch them. But we should probably talk about it first. 🙂
Yeah that's pretty much exactly what I meant in my post, but you worded it better.
I think it's RM. At first I was confused as to his reason for lynching me (because I'm a new player, so apparently I should be out before I'm even in). But now thinking about it, it's easier for him to get someone who nobody knows out or cares about out of the game.
I still don't have a glaring suspicion of anyone yet, as it's still only the first day. My current vote was just an RNG.
By my count, 2 content related posts.
what that's it? really? :l
I recommend when you want to check what you have said or another player has said, to click on your/their Messages count # under the avatar. It will pull up all posted messages. Another way is to go up to the search bar and type their user name and this thread. 🙂
Take care!!!
It's carryover from Pan. It all started a long couple games ago.....
I think his reason for lynching you is as valid as an RNG vote. It's probably not something you should take personally.
That's a LOT of work. I enjoyed it but it was work.
I agree that there is definitely a difference between neutral and chaos. I've played both roles. But there are games where chaos can with WITH the wolves or villagers. They may still be out for themselves and screw things up though so it's usually best to get rid of them imo. Neutral players generally don't "win" at all or just need to survive til the end of the game and "win" with whatever side/faction won.
But you are forgetting that each and every one of us is a special snowflake that deserves their own phenomenal role that is as special as we are! (Says the person guilty of usually giving everyone a decent role)
I don't think STL is being any more talkative than anyone else, that's not the basis for my lynch vote. I just think RNG is something of a cop-out when people are posting this much. I find it hard to believe that with this much conversation, people can't pick apart a post and find a reason for a vote.
And they still have that pesky problem of not counting toward villager numbers.
I'd still say debatable for villagers or wolves to want to get rid of a neutral. Sure, they don't count towards their numbers, but that also means that getting rid of them wastes a side's "turn" (lynch for villagers, kill for wolves) that could be used to progress towards winning.
Does iso = isolate?
"In search of"
Chaos, yes, because you don't know if they might win over the villagers once the wolves are gone. Neutrals, I'd leave alone since lynching them doesn't really benefit anyone.
Actually, I thought it meant "isolate", as in reading one person's posts isolated from the main thread
Because "I have a role," as I posted at the beginning of the game and gave 1 post saying some people instead of some of us, which I would do regardless of if I had a role or not
So who strikes you as suspicious?
***********************
**********
I think you made this post just so you can say "my fiancé" now😛**********
My fiance says I should just tell you guys I'm playing anyway, even though I missed sign ups and the thread is already on page 9. I can do that, right? 😉
**********
In all seriousness, if you want a role, I was debating switching out after this lynch. Was going to give it to SOV, but it might be more entertaining for you two to somehow compete for it 😛
I think a veteran wolf would be keen enough to avoid bandwagoning a potentially important villager right off the bat but as someone (VMH?) mentioned noobs wolves (if any) aren't able to talk to their counterparts yet and may have jumped the gun. Just something to consider.
**************
