Biden Out of Race

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Glad you can read the tea leaves, why can't you recognize what is plainly said by trump?
"Poison our blood"
"Enemy within"
There are soooo many others.

Blood poisoner here 🙋🏽‍♂️. Very proud of our child who has poisoned blood coursing through her veins and grateful to our leftie socialist state that awarded her a grant to attend graduate school so I don’t have to pay for it.

I’m likely the enemy within too😜
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Blood poisoner here 🙋🏽‍♂️. Very proud of our child who has poisoned blood coursing through her veins and grateful to our leftie socialist state that awarded her a grant to attend graduate school so I don’t have to pay for it.

I’m likely the enemy within too😜

I'm pretty sure Trump was referring to murderers, rapists and other violent criminals that are also illegal immigrants, not necessarily any specific country of origin.

I don't remember exactly where but I think it was on one of the podcast's Trump was on, where he specifically referenced the idea behind the "serial killer gene"

Unless you join in on violent riots like the ones surrounding the death of George Floyd, or the protestors in Seattle I don't think you'd qualify as an enemy from within either.
 
I'm pretty sure Trump was referring to murderers, rapists and other violent criminals that are also illegal immigrants, not necessarily any specific country of origin.

I don't remember exactly where but I think it was on one of the podcast's Trump was on, where he specifically referenced the idea behind the "serial killer gene"

Unless you join in on violent riots like the ones surrounding the death of George Floyd, or the protestors in Seattle I don't think you'd qualify as an enemy from within either.


Our family and friends did march in several BLM marches but they were not violent.


Trump is poisoning this country with his violent sociopath rapist blood. Can we deport him?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm pretty sure Trump was referring to murderers, rapists and other violent criminals that are also illegal immigrants, not necessarily any specific country of origin.

I don't remember exactly where but I think it was on one of the podcast's Trump was on, where he specifically referenced the idea behind the "serial killer gene"

Unless you join in on violent riots like the ones surrounding the death of George Floyd, or the protestors in Seattle I don't think you'd qualify as an enemy from within either.
Pretty sure (like 100 percent, he repeated it on fox) nan y Pelosi, Adam Schiff, were enemies
And this also raises another Trump standard, his acolytes keep "finding" a meaning or interpreting what he plainly says.
If he was so."plain spoken" or "telling it like it is" why do you have to explain what he means?
I am used to that in religious texts but not quite so much in a presidential candidate. I do not have to parse the words.of buden or harris to this degree.
Could.it be that all of you Trump supporters really know but do not want to acknowledge it?
 
Last edited:
I'm pretty sure Trump was referring to murderers, rapists and other violent criminals that are also illegal immigrants, not necessarily any specific country of origin.

I don't remember exactly where but I think it was on one of the podcast's Trump was on, where he specifically referenced the idea behind the "serial killer gene"

Unless you join in on violent riots like the ones surrounding the death of George Floyd, or the protestors in Seattle I don't think you'd qualify as an enemy from within either.

Does the MSM offers classes on Trump interpretation? Why does every Trumper have to start off a response with “I’m pretty sure Trump was referring to…”?
 
I'm pretty sure Trump was referring to murderers, rapists and other violent criminals that are also illegal immigrants, not necessarily any specific country of origin.

I don't remember exactly where but I think it was on one of the podcast's Trump was on, where he specifically referenced the idea behind the "serial killer gene"

Unless you join in on violent riots like the ones surrounding the death of George Floyd, or the protestors in Seattle I don't think you'd qualify as an enemy f

I agree with you here.
And this is your guy.
 
Yes, but what he really meant was [insert standard MAGA excuse]. Race isn’t a factor. Sex isn’t a factor. The base cares about policy. Blah blah blah.
Oh yeah...policy wink wink.
Ask someone to.define a.policy with details.
 
How does blocking then affect your ability to see their posts? What if they reply to one of your posts? You won't see it?

It shows up as ‘ignored content’ or something like that. You can still read it if you want. Over time it becomes very nice not seeing content from the posters I’ve ignored (there is a reason I put them on ignore after all….).
 
Whenever Trump appears sane for just a few days, many forget that he is a vile human being.
Just out of curiosity what are these sane days?
He sounds like this has these people around him, all the time. It is not newsworthy when it is every day.
You just paid attention today.
 
Just out of curiosity what are these sane days?
He sounds like this has these people around him, all the time. It is not newsworthy when it is every day.
You just paid attention today.
Well, I am being generous here.
 
Yes, but what he really meant was [insert standard MAGA excuse]. Race isn’t a factor. Sex isn’t a factor. The base cares about policy. Blah blah blah.
Many (or probably most) of the people who are voting for him it's because of that. He is just saying what these people are afraid to say. Well, actually Gassman was able to say it here.
 

These very smart and successful people are limiting their free speech for fear of retribution from the government (well, from a mercurial potential future president). That seems good for a country.
 
My favorite part of this post is the laughing emoji from @PB2464. Because it’s really funny to laugh at a disparaging comment, right? But at the same time continually defend an admitted scientific racist after they’re banned. Classic MAGA.

Ah the claim to be such a moralist!
One question: when does a baby become real to you? I'm sure the answer to this won't be worse than laughing at a murse joke. Off the high horse buddy.

A person has a right to defend themselves. That doesn't equal support. How many times do you have to be told that?
 
Ah the claim to be such a moralist!
One question: when does a baby become real to you? I'm sure the answer to this won't be worse than laughing at a murse joke. Off the high horse buddy.

A person has a right to defend themselves. That doesn't equal support. How many times do you have to be told that?

He had months to defend himself. But I’m glad you’ve stepped in on his behalf. Mighty brave. I’ll decline your weird abortion debate invite and slide you on over to ignore. See ya!
 
Pretty sure (like 100 percent, he repeated it on fox) nan y Pelosi, Adam Schiff, were enemies
And this also raises another Trump standard, his acolytes keep "finding" a meaning or interpreting what he plainly says.
If he was so."plain spoken" or "telling it like it is" why do you have to explain what he means?
I am used to that in religious texts but not quite so much in a presidential candidate. I do not have to parse the words.of buden or harris to this degree.
Could.it be that all of you Trump supporters really know but do not want to acknowledge it?

There are two distinct circumstances where trump has used the term "enemies from within" that caught all the hubub recently (prior to it being repeated ad nauseam by the media and commentators). The first was what I described in my last post, in reference to violent riots destroying infrastructure in which he said it may be appropriate to get the national guard or even the military involved to stop.

On a separate instance trump said that he thinks Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi are enemies from within (politically), but he did not say that his intention was to use the US military to take out Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi. Pundits are taking pieces from each conversation and putting them together. "So.... because you think you should use the the military to stop the enemy from within (rioters), you're going to use the military to destroy all your political opponents!?!?!?!" It's a contrived narrative.

On the other side of the narrative I also think that the idea that "Dark Brandon" Biden is intentionally obfuscating Kamala in secret by doing XYZ is also just pundit talking points.

It's pretty incredible the lengths that pundits go to drag out manufactured stories for air time.

Trump does make it easy for them due to the words he says. For instance when he decided to use the word Bloodbath to discuss China's effect on the US Auto Industry if there isn't any intervention, and the idea of Trump wanting a bloodbath if he loses hencforth and evermore being repeated by the media as a democrat talking point.

I'm honestly just excited for the election to be over so all the pundits can go back into semi hibernation.
 
There are two distinct circumstances where trump has used the term "enemies from within" that caught all the hubub recently (prior to it being repeated ad nauseam by the media and commentators). The first was what I described in my last post, in reference to violent riots destroying infrastructure in which he said it may be appropriate to get the national guard or even the military involved to stop.

On a separate instance trump said that he thinks Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi are enemies from within (politically), but he did not say that his intention was to use the US military to take out Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi. Pundits are taking pieces from each conversation and putting them together. "So.... because you think you should use the the military to stop the enemy from within (rioters), you're going to use the military to destroy all your political opponents!?!?!?!" It's a contrived narrative.

On the other side of the narrative I also think that the idea that "Dark Brandon" Biden is intentionally obfuscating Kamala in secret by doing XYZ is also just pundit talking points.

It's pretty incredible the lengths that pundits go to drag out manufactured stories for air time.

Trump does make it easy for them due to the words he says. For instance when he decided to use the word Bloodbath to discuss China's effect on the US Auto Industry if there isn't any intervention, and the idea of Trump wanting a bloodbath if he loses hencforth and evermore being repeated by the media as a democrat talking point.

I'm honestly just excited for the election to be over so all the pundits can go back into semi hibernation.
No he put them together on fox. Plain english
 
So lets cut to the chase. Do you in all honesty deep in your soul believe that Trump (if he were to be elected) would bring an army of military sycophants into DC and march every democrat or RINO politician out to the gulag for threatening his Godlike authority in order to establish the 4th Reich?

That's what left leaning pundits are fear mongering about, while right leaning pundits fear monger about massive coordinated election fraud. I think both are insane rhetoric.
 
No not in thus cartoon like effort. He would do as he promised. I already outlined it.
I do not find myself justifying or interpreting statements by harris or biden in regards to violence. I do not recall having to reconcile these statements with Romney ,bush, McCain,
etc etc.
Why this one and why are you damn eager to do it.
Insane? Who directed a mob at the capital, who attempted to overthrow the government via the electors plot?
Your "logic" would place kidnapper with children and act surprised if something happened.
We are not confabulating he already tried.
 
So lets cut to the chase. Do you in all honesty deep in your soul believe that Trump (if he were to be elected) would bring an army of military sycophants into DC and march every democrat or RINO politician out to the gulag for threatening his Godlike authority in order to establish the 4th Reich?

That's what left leaning pundits are fear mongering about, while right leaning pundits fear monger about massive coordinated election fraud. I think both are insane rhetoric.

I believe he would pursue actions similar to if not worse than the false electors scheme. I believe he has a much stronger control of the Republican party and conservative political infrastructure today than in 2020 as well, so he would likely be more successful in such crimes.


 
Last edited:


If anyone on the right, left, or independent care to be educated then watch this video. Watch it all if you want to judge if this Guest pollster is bipartisan but he grew up a democrat and now an independent. He gives some good talking points and backs it up with data. Turn to about 18 minutes when he talks about the party of the elite vs the working class. Many other great points that debunks many left ideology on here but I am sure this will continue to change no one.

1. The top 1% including the doctorate level class vote +30% democrat. Their elite views are essentially they know better than the lower classes and think their views have little meaning. He goes on to say that the top 1% goes against everything America democracy stands for.
2. The working class votes/leans right to the Republicans.

Many more tidbits which is fascinating backed up by data/polls.

So those who thinks Dems are the party of the working class, polls shows that this is a lie. Those who thinks Repubs are the party of the rich/Billionaires/elites then this is profoundly false. In fact Dems control most of the power.

Aside from this video, is it not fascinating that eventhough KH has raised over 1B, every darn time I open a presidential youtube video; I get an add from KH or Obama asking for more money? Sure sounds like the party of the elite/rich.

Also, I find it very demeaning to black men/voters that B. Obama chastised black men who does not vote for KH. I find it demeaning that M. Obama chastised people who are sitting out this election or voting DJT that they are voting against Women. Quite racists and sexists speak if you ask me. If DJT told white men/voters that not voting or voting for KH is a vote against white people the news would be plastered with racists remarks. If M. Trump chastised people who is sitting out/voting for KH that it is a vote against men/babies, this board would be plastered with sexists comments.

Left Maga on here won't care, but sometimes looking in the mirror helps to center you.
 
Last edited:
Whenever Trump appears sane for just a few days, many forget that he is a vile human being.
Can you atleast now agree that after the J Rogan 3 hr discussion that he is mentally fit? Mean, vile, or whatever you want to label him; You have to admit he is cognitively competant.
 

These very smart and successful people are limiting their free speech for fear of retribution from the government (well, from a mercurial potential future president). That seems good for a country.
The Democratic party is the party of the rich and elite. They are covering their A$$ b/c they know a DJT win would weaken their power. The know a KH win would mean business as usual and someone they can control.
 
Is that even remotely true?


As much as the MSM and Silicon Valley billionaires are pulling for Trump, make no mistakes, they are still rivals with each other. Trump is a puppet and useful idiot. Bezos and Musk are definitely rivals and are competing with each other to get to space and develop super-intelligent AI.
 
So lets cut to the chase. Do you in all honesty deep in your soul believe that Trump (if he were to be elected) would bring an army of military sycophants into DC and march every democrat or RINO politician out to the gulag for threatening his Godlike authority in order to establish the 4th Reich?

That's what left leaning pundits are fear mongering about, while right leaning pundits fear monger about massive coordinated election fraud. I think both are insane rhetoric.
The left have KJT derangement syndrome, no way to reason with them. They think another DJT term would mean the end of democracy and turn into a fascists autocratic rule. He was president for 4 yrs and this never happened. If he wins again, and after 4 years of it not happening they will pivot to some other platform.
 
FTC Chair, Lina Khan, a Biden nominee is the one who is banning noncompetes. I wonder if a Trump nominee would have done the same.
 
Can you atleast now agree that after the J Rogan 3 hr discussion that he is mentally fit? Mean, vile, or whatever you want to label him; You have to admit he is cognitively competant.
There are a lot of.people in mental institutions, nursing homes and street corners that can talk for hours.
Bundy spoke well, was he mentally competent?
 


If anyone on the right, left, or independent care to be educated then watch this video. Watch it all if you want to judge if this Guest pollster is bipartisan but he grew up a democrat and now an independent. He gives some good talking points and backs it up with data. Turn to about 18 minutes when he talks about the party of the elite vs the working class. Many other great points that debunks many left ideology on here but I am sure this will continue to change no one.

1. The top 1% including the doctorate level class vote +30% democrat. Their elite views are essentially they know better than the lower classes and think their views have little meaning. He goes on to say that the top 1% goes against everything America democracy stands for.
2. The working class votes/leans right to the Republicans.

Many more tidbits which is fascinating backed up by data/polls.

So those who thinks Dems are the party of the working class, polls shows that this is a lie. Those who thinks Repubs are the party of the rich/Billionaires/elites then this is profoundly false. In fact Dems control most of the power.

Aside from this video, is it not fascinating that eventhough KH has raised over 1B, every darn time I open a presidential youtube video; I get an add from KH or Obama asking for more money? Sure sounds like the party of the elite/rich.

Also, I find it very demeaning to black men/voters that B. Obama chastised black men who does not vote for KH. I find it demeaning that M. Obama chastised people who are sitting out this election or voting DJT that they are voting against Women. Quite racists and sexists speak if you ask me. If DJT told white men/voters that not voting or voting for KH is a vote against white people the news would be plastered with racists remarks. If M. Trump chastised people who is sitting out/voting for KH that it is a vote against men/babies, this board would be plastered with sexists comments.

Left Maga on here won't care, but sometimes looking in the mirror helps to center you.

Ahh a truly neutral and nonpartisan organization, if this is a reliable source for you I can safely put you in the "futile file" for rational conversation.
Go read some breitbart and tune into OAN.
 
The left have KJT derangement syndrome, no way to reason with them. They think another DJT term would mean the end of democracy and turn into a fascists autocratic rule. He was president for 4 yrs and this never happened. If he wins again, and after 4 years of it not happening they will pivot to some other platform.

Trump will leave me worse off financially. How is that derangement? You are brainwashed into a cult. There’s no reasoning with you. You all wear the same hat = cult
 
FTC Chair, Lina Khan, a Biden nominee is the one who is banning noncompetes. I wonder if a Trump nominee would have done the same.

Don’t wonder. The answer is no. The fact that the anesthesiologist Trumpers on this thread don’t recognize how significant that would be financially is even more evidence that they are brainwashed by MSM.
 
Ahh a truly neutral and nonpartisan organization, if this is a reliable source for you I can safely put you in the "futile file" for rational conversation.
Go read some breitbart and tune into OAN.
If you think this is BB or OAN, then you have truly lost it.

There is a reason DJT is over polling with Latino and AA voters. Sometimes you have to stand back and ask why if he is a racists/hates immigrants that he is over polling past Rep Nominees.
 
If you think this is BB or OAN, then you have truly lost it.

There is a reason DJT is over polling with Latino and AA voters. Sometimes you have to stand back and ask why if he is a racists/hates immigrants that he is over polling past Rep Nominees.
When their masthead says conservative news, woke collusion transgender issues are the headlines yeah it is.
Jesus you cannot even recognize news can you?
 
That is trying to prove a negative.

I would gladly do that if you can prove KH is not on Cocaine. I think you have lost it.

Hi:

I have faith that your boy Trump uses cocaine (at least when needed). Are you questioning my faith? Also, it is well known that he was a frequent user of cocaine on The Apprentice and would often shlt his pants to the point where his smell was unbearable to be around.
 
Hi:

I have faith that your boy Trump uses cocaine (at least when needed). Are you questioning my faith? Also, it is well known that he was a frequent user of cocaine on The Apprentice and would often shlt his pants to the point where his smell was unbearable to be around.
This did not prove she does not use cocaine. Where was the drug screen? I am not even saying she is not fit. She is mentally fit. But you still have not proved that she is not on drugs.
 
Polymarket and betting odds continue to overwhelmingly favor DJT.

Currently at 66% to win. KH has 1 week to pull something out of her Hat.

If DJT Wins, Left MAGA on here needs to look in the mirror and self reflect why their views goes against US Voters.

The betting favorite has only lost twice since 1866, according to the Conversation, a nonprofit news organization.

Hillary Clinton's odds stood at -323, but Clinton went on to lose the election in one of the two times the betting underdog won on election night.

The other upset came in 1948, when Harry Truman (D) beat eight-to-one odds to defeat Thomas Dewey (R).
 
Top