Biden Out of Race

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Screenshot_20250611_071231_Bluesky~2.jpg


The authoritarianism is getting worse. Here is celebrated academic Chris Rufo advocating for "unmarked vans to follow key agitators and snatch them from the streets while the media are not looking".

The more ICE and cops act like a cartel, the more at risk they will be from the populace, the more they will act like a cartel...

New marching orders are coming out for the conservative influencers on legal immigration now.

These people see an opportunity for their message to spread.

Screenshot_20250611_071920_Reddit~2.jpg
 
Last edited:
View attachment 404854

The authoritarianism is getting worse. Here is celebrated academic Chris Rufo advocating for "unmarked vans to follow key agitators and snatch them from the streets while the media are not looking".

The more ICE and cops act like a cartel, the more at risk they will be from the populace, the more they will act like a cartel...

New marching orders are coming out for the conservative influencers on legal immigration now.

These people see an opportunity for their message to spread.

View attachment 404855
The irony is the united states of america is more third world than before.
 
"While some organizations reported from inside the protest itself, most did not: They set up camp behind the police line, or reported using drone footage, or simply asked the cops what to say. “Dozens of people were arrested Sunday and accused of attempted murder, arson and other crimes during a day of violence and protests in Los Angeles,” NBC Los Angeles declared in an article based exclusively on LAPD sources. It’s an understandable decision on their part. Just look at Lauren Tomasi, a reporter for the Australian Channel Nine news service who got “caught in the crossfire” and struck with a rubber bullet while reporting—by which I mean an LA police officer aimed directly at the reporter from close range and shot her. She reports being “sore, but OK,” which is more than photographer Nick Stern can say: The day before, a “less lethal” round punctured his leg and required emergency surgery. As of Tuesday morning, the LA Press Club documented over 30 injuries to members of the press. Easier and safer to parrot police talking points than face down their guns.

I spent Sunday from about 4 pm until very late inside the LA protests, and this is what I saw. Yes, cars were set on fire in one part of the sprawling, multi-block protest. Yes, fireworks were launched at cops—a handful, sporadically. But it should be noted that these were launched long after these police officers began unloading flash bang after flash bang, rubber bullet after rubber bullet, into a largely peaceful crowd. (Flash bangs are stun grenades that produce a flash of light and deafening noise.)

The idea that cops were just reacting to protester provocation is absurd. Cops occupied intersections in an attempt to split the protest, then occasionally charged the protest lines that surrounded them to force the crowds to temporarily retreat. These assaults seemed unrelated to protester action or lack thereof. At one point, while the cops were unloading round after round of blue-tipped rubber bullets into a crowd hunkered down behind a barricade, a different group of protesters approached from the side and threw a firework into the center of the police line. The cops turned their fire against the group, which ran off, but did not pursue them. Thirty seconds later, the cops were back to shooting at the barricade."


Different perspective from behind the barricade.
 
"While some organizations reported from inside the protest itself, most did not: They set up camp behind the police line, or reported using drone footage, or simply asked the cops what to say. “Dozens of people were arrested Sunday and accused of attempted murder, arson and other crimes during a day of violence and protests in Los Angeles,” NBC Los Angeles declared in an article based exclusively on LAPD sources. It’s an understandable decision on their part. Just look at Lauren Tomasi, a reporter for the Australian Channel Nine news service who got “caught in the crossfire” and struck with a rubber bullet while reporting—by which I mean an LA police officer aimed directly at the reporter from close range and shot her. She reports being “sore, but OK,” which is more than photographer Nick Stern can say: The day before, a “less lethal” round punctured his leg and required emergency surgery. As of Tuesday morning, the LA Press Club documented over 30 injuries to members of the press. Easier and safer to parrot police talking points than face down their guns.

I spent Sunday from about 4 pm until very late inside the LA protests, and this is what I saw. Yes, cars were set on fire in one part of the sprawling, multi-block protest. Yes, fireworks were launched at cops—a handful, sporadically. But it should be noted that these were launched long after these police officers began unloading flash bang after flash bang, rubber bullet after rubber bullet, into a largely peaceful crowd. (Flash bangs are stun grenades that produce a flash of light and deafening noise.)

The idea that cops were just reacting to protester provocation is absurd. Cops occupied intersections in an attempt to split the protest, then occasionally charged the protest lines that surrounded them to force the crowds to temporarily retreat. These assaults seemed unrelated to protester action or lack thereof. At one point, while the cops were unloading round after round of blue-tipped rubber bullets into a crowd hunkered down behind a barricade, a different group of protesters approached from the side and threw a firework into the center of the police line. The cops turned their fire against the group, which ran off, but did not pursue them. Thirty seconds later, the cops were back to shooting at the barricade."


Different perspective from behind the barricade.


Ya I just spent about 30 second on freelance journalist Laura Jedeed’s feeds. Definitely an impartial non bias reporter man. Great source to show “both sides”. You don’t think it’s telling that the “attacked” reporters, in their own words, just viewed it as being caught in the cross fire and part of the job?

The left will never win this argument that these protestors are the victims, as long as people have eyes.

 
Ya I just spent about 30 second on freelance journalist Laura Jedeed’s feeds. Definitely an impartial non bias reporter man.

Did she report anything factually incorrect? Everyone has their biases, not sure what you're getting at.

Great source to show “both sides”.

She was there. She has opinions. I get you've already made up your mind, but all I commented was that this is a different perspective.

Maybe further reporting will corroborate or dismiss this perspective. Further reporting certainly dismissed the people who were skeptical of the January 6th insurrection.
 
For every one of those photos, there should be one of these attached as a reminder to wait for more reporting. Wait for investigations.

View attachment 404873
If you knew the backstory on this photo, you wouldn't be joking around about it. The original Oscar the Grouch from Sesame Street died that day when a vandal threw a molotov cocktail into his recently renovated home. Ruthless photographers gathered around to capture the moment with no regard to trying to help, as Oscar was burned alive. The culprit was never caught, but a handful of onlookers described seeing some soot stained yellow feathers wafting through the air following the explosion and landing on the nearby ground. Another onlooker described a middle aged bearded man who was nearby when it happened. Police believe that he may have had a hand in it. That unknown individual remains a person of interest.
**This story was brought to you by the letter A and the number 7.
 
Did she report anything factually incorrect? Everyone has their biases, not sure what you're getting at.


She was there. She has opinions. I get you've already made up your mind, but all I commented was that this is a different perspective.

Maybe further reporting will corroborate or dismiss this perspective. Further reporting certainly dismissed the people who were skeptical of the January 6th insurrection.

Even from the articles that are trying to convince you of that argument…

“Olmos, 35, an investigative reporter for the nonprofit news organization CalMatters, was in the protest crowd shooting video on his iPhone. He was at the intersection of East Temple and North Alameda streets, just blocks from a complex of federal buildings, when police shot into the crowd and hit him.”

“Sergio Olmos has covered hundreds of days of protests in his career as a journalist. He estimates he’s been hit dozens of times”


Guy had been shot DOZENS of times covering “protests”. In the day every dingus with an iPhone is an independent journalist and everyone is filming everything, getting shot while covering the riot from the side of the protestors seems like a well known risk.

J6 is very relevant considering several recent posts here. I think we all agree, an attack by 2500 people on 4 acres was more than good enough reason to call up the national guard then? The last time a violent (unarmed) protestor was shot and killed by law enforcement was J6. There aren’t a lot of people here even on the right demanding justice for Ashley Babbitt? I think it’s because we understand if this is the type of game you want to play, don’t be upset when you get your stupid prize to go with it.

I’m saying her spin is ridiculous. The Maxine Waters defense, and trying to paint law enforcement as brutish authoritarian thugs, is laughable. Stop acting like these guys are mustard gassing permit authorized drum circles while clamoring for states rights. Right now the left are the immature children in the room that have no direction and no idea what they actually stand for.

 
For every one of those photos, there should be one of these attached as a reminder to wait for more reporting. Wait for investigations.

View attachment 404873


All of the photos SHOULD look similar this, but picture is worth a thousand words, and the left is giving the administration hundreds of photo ops every day.
 
Ya ummmmm **** that ish…soldiers detaining people is the same as an arrest without the paperwork. This just means soldiers are gonna be putting hands on civilians (rioters or otherwise). How are they gonna be detaining them? Zip ties? Cuffs? Pointing their non ammo containing rifles at them? Physically holding them? This is gonna be a **** show. Bunch ****ing crayon eating jarheads being able to detain US citizens? I’m sure that’s not gonna go well.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/tr...individuals-no-arrest-authorities-2025-06-11/
 
Ya ummmmm **** that ish…soldiers detaining people is the same as an arrest without the paperwork. This just means soldiers are gonna be putting hands on civilians (rioters or otherwise). How are they gonna be detaining them? Zip ties? Cuffs? Pointing their non ammo containing rifles at them? Physically holding them? This is gonna be a **** show. Bunch ****ing crayon eating jarheads being able to detain US citizens? I’m sure that’s not gonna go well.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/tr...individuals-no-arrest-authorities-2025-06-11/


Bro, that’s military crowd control 101.
 
Guy had been shot DOZENS of times covering “protests”. In the day every dingus with an iPhone is an independent journalist and everyone is filming everything, getting shot while covering the riot from the side of the protestors seems like a well known risk.

Cops shoot protesters and journalists. It is a dangerous job. I didn't disagree with that. I think it is worth noting each time a journalist gets shot, you seem remarkably willing to see them all as provocateurs.

Edit: Or maybe the provocateurs are just the ones who disagree with your politics

There aren’t a lot of people here even on the right demanding justice for Ashley Babbitt?

Yes. There are a lot of people, including sitting members of Congress and prominent Conservative media personalities who see her as a martyr. There is a wide constituency seeking "justice" for Ashli Babbit. The Trump administration is ok with labeling it a wrongful death and is giving her family $5M, that is an appeasement to those folks who don't think she did anything wrong. This is a sizeable coalition of conservative propagandists.

"...Gradually, though, efforts were made to suggest that Babbitt was a martyr, or at least a patriot who was unjustly killed. Fox News hosts Tucker Carlson, Laura Ingraham and Mark Levin were sympathetic to Babbitt, with Levin understating Babbitt's actions and claiming that she had just been "walking around with the rest". U.S. Representative Paul Gosar (R-AZ) said Babbitt had been "executed", later doubling down on that comment and adding that the police officer had been "lying in wait" and demanding to know his name. This drew a rebuke from then-representative Liz Cheney, who accused Gosar of "[smearing] the men and women who defended us". The Washington Post reported in June 2021, "increasingly, key elements of the conservative movement [were] suggesting Ashli Babbitt was a martyr. According to The New York Times, these included far-right extremists and white supremacists, some of whom also viewed Babbitt as a "freedom fighter". Democratic strategist Mark Burns said this was a "dangerous development for a Republican Party with members increasingly comfortable pressing for and defending political violence." Both he and David Frum in The Atlantic compared these efforts to the Nazi glorification of Horst Wessel."


I’m saying her spin is ridiculous. The Maxine Waters defense, and trying to paint law enforcement as brutish authoritarian thugs, is laughable. Stop acting like these guys are mustard gassing permit authorized drum circles while clamoring for states rights. Right now the left are the immature children in the room that have no direction and no idea what they actually stand for.

You are, once again, hyperbolizing valid criticism. You see and read about journalists being shot at, and your gut instinct is to defend the cops. You (presumably) watched that Tomassi reporter get shot at, and even Gern doesn't defend that one. But you're out here carrying water for an increasingly authoritarian movement and administration.
 
Last edited:
I feel like I need to remind Conservatives what the reasonable and moral Conservative position was just 5 years ago (June 4, 2020) to see where we're at now. This isn't the "The President can do it because it's legally permissible" position, this is "The President shouldn't do it because it's immoral" position.

"I have watched this week's unfolding events, angry and appalled. The words "Equal Justice Under Law" are carved in the pediment of the United States Supreme Court. This is precisely what protesters are rightly demanding. It is a wholesome and unifying demand — one that all of us should be able to get behind. We must not be distracted by a small number of lawbreakers. The protests are defined by tens of thousands of people of conscience who are insisting that we live up to our values — our values as people and our values as a nation.

When I joined the military, some 50 years ago, I swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution. Never did I dream that troops taking that same oath would be ordered under any circumstance to violate the Constitutional rights of their fellow citizens — much less to provide a bizarre photo op for the elected commander-in-chief, with military leadership standing alongside.

We must reject any thinking of our cities as a "battlespace" that our uniformed military is called upon to "dominate." At home, we should use our military only when requested to do so, on very rare occasions, by state governors. Militarizing our response, as we witnessed in Washington, D.C., sets up a conflict — a false conflict — between the military and civilian society. It erodes the moral ground that ensures a trusted bond between men and women in uniform and the society they are sworn to protect, and of which they themselves are a part. Keeping public order rests with civilian state and local leaders who best understand their communities and are answerable to them.

James Madison wrote in Federalist 14 that "America united with a handful of troops, or without a single soldier, exhibits a more forbidding posture to foreign ambition than America disunited, with a hundred thousand veterans ready for combat." We do not need to militarize our response to protests. We need to unite around a common purpose. And it starts by guaranteeing that all of us are equal before the law.

Donald Trump is the first president in my lifetime who does not try to unite the American people — does not even pretend to try. Instead he tries to divide us. We are witnessing the consequences of three years of this deliberate effort. We are witnessing the consequences of three years without mature leadership. We can unite without him, drawing on the strengths inherent in our civil society. This will not be easy, as the past few days have shown, but we owe it to our fellow citizens; to past generations that bled to defend our promise; and to our children.

We can come through this trying time stronger, and with a renewed sense of purpose and respect for one another...

- Jim Mattis Former SecDef, Former Chairmen of the Joint Chiefs

 
Yes. There are a lot of people, including sitting members of Congress and prominent Conservative media personalities who see her as a martyr. There is a wide constituency seeking "justice" for Ashli Babbit. The Trump administration is ok with labeling it a wrongful death and is giving her family $5M, that is an appeasement to those folks who don't think she did anything wrong. This is a sizeable coalition of conservative propagandists.

Right, the MAGA right, and “far right extremists and white supremacists” viewed her as a “martyr and freedom fighter”. Like I said, I don’t recall anyone here left, right, or otherwise making any such claim, I think we understand for better or worse, that was a risk she took for her actions, and the officer acted within the law.

You like to make arguments about what is morally right, and just, do you think her shooting death was moral and just? Because we seem happy to point out how law enforcement in LA doesn’t seem to be acting morally, and they are only using rubber bullets and tear gas. I don’t remember anyone body saying that about her case.

God forbid any rioters get killed in LA, the legal ramifications likely won’t stop at a 5M appeasement.


You are, once again, hyperbolizing valid criticism. You see and read about journalists being shot at, and your gut instinct is to defend the cops. You (presumably) watched that Tomassi reporter get shot at, and even Gern doesn't defend that one. But you're out here carrying water for an increasingly authoritarian movement and administration.

I don’t buy that “journalists are under attack” by authoritarian jack boots, and that’s clearly the message some are trying to push.
 
I feel like I need to remind Conservatives what the reasonable and moral Conservative position was just 5 years ago (June 4, 2020) to see where we're at now. This isn't the "The President can do it because it's legally permissible" position, this is "The President shouldn't do it because it's immoral" position.

"I have watched this week's unfolding events, angry and appalled. The words "Equal Justice Under Law" are carved in the pediment of the United States Supreme Court. This is precisely what protesters are rightly demanding. It is a wholesome and unifying demand — one that all of us should be able to get behind. We must not be distracted by a small number of lawbreakers. The protests are defined by tens of thousands of people of conscience who are insisting that we live up to our values — our values as people and our values as a nation.

When I joined the military, some 50 years ago, I swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution. Never did I dream that troops taking that same oath would be ordered under any circumstance to violate the Constitutional rights of their fellow citizens — much less to provide a bizarre photo op for the elected commander-in-chief, with military leadership standing alongside.

We must reject any thinking of our cities as a "battlespace" that our uniformed military is called upon to "dominate." At home, we should use our military only when requested to do so, on very rare occasions, by state governors. Militarizing our response, as we witnessed in Washington, D.C., sets up a conflict — a false conflict — between the military and civilian society. It erodes the moral ground that ensures a trusted bond between men and women in uniform and the society they are sworn to protect, and of which they themselves are a part. Keeping public order rests with civilian state and local leaders who best understand their communities and are answerable to them.

James Madison wrote in Federalist 14 that "America united with a handful of troops, or without a single soldier, exhibits a more forbidding posture to foreign ambition than America disunited, with a hundred thousand veterans ready for combat." We do not need to militarize our response to protests. We need to unite around a common purpose. And it starts by guaranteeing that all of us are equal before the law.

Donald Trump is the first president in my lifetime who does not try to unite the American people — does not even pretend to try. Instead he tries to divide us. We are witnessing the consequences of three years of this deliberate effort. We are witnessing the consequences of three years without mature leadership. We can unite without him, drawing on the strengths inherent in our civil society. This will not be easy, as the past few days have shown, but we owe it to our fellow citizens; to past generations that bled to defend our promise; and to our children.

We can come through this trying time stronger, and with a renewed sense of purpose and respect for one another...

- Jim Mattis Former SecDef, Former Chairmen of the Joint Chiefs



He said the same thing in 2020. While cities were burning.

 
You like to make arguments about what is morally right, and just, do you think her shooting death was moral and just? Because we seem happy to point out how law enforcement in LA doesn’t seem to be acting morally, and they are only using rubber bullets and tear gas. I don’t remember anyone body saying that about her case.

I've defended police shootings before (not necessarily on here), as surprising as that might sound. I recall thinking it was justified at the time. I think she had a knife? (don't recall if she was holding it...) and there were multiple warnings? It's been a while since I looked at the specifics.

I agree the molotov holding protesters likely could have been shot justifiably (morally and legally) from your other post, but I would want to see the footage to make that determination.

Right, the MAGA right, and “far right extremists and white supremacists” viewed her as a “martyr and freedom fighter”.

We have some MAGA right on here. I imagine if asked, some would defend her. I wouldn't be so skeptical of that.
 
He said the same thing in 2020. While cities were burning.


I did attempt to make it known that this wasn't a recent quote by including the date and describing what I've perceived as a decline in conservatism.

We'll see if Trump wants to get any photo ops in this time around.
 
I agree with this take. And things are not helped by the fact that basically all social media today is controlled by the Tech Right. One of the things we learned in 2024 was that folks nowadays get much of their news from social media, and not the traditional outlets of the past. When you run all the social media, it's easier to "control the narrative" and spread propaganda. Even if it's unrepresentative of what's really happening, sites will force feed everyone's social media with what they want you to see, usually the stuff that gets the most views/clicks. Perception becomes reality. View attachment 404842




I drove from San Diego to Calabasas on Saturday morning and returned on Sunday afternoon. I missed the whole damn thing. Maybe because I took the 405. I might have seen something if I took the 101. Oh well.
 
Nope. Hard disagree, that might be true for soldiers in war zones, but not here.

No offense. You are just wrong. We should be glad that they are confirming that is the role they will have which is consistent with posse comitatus verbiage and straight out of the field manual. Stepping outside that limited role would take the insurrection act. Chapter 3 of FM 3-19.15 covers it pretty well.
 
Bunch ****ing crayon eating jarheads being able to detain US citizens? I’m sure that’s not gonna go well.
Aren't you a life long military guy? Why so disparaging to the military? Is it a military branch rivalry issue or do you hate the military? I appreciate their willingness to serve and I suspect they will have things controlled fairly well in short order. My hope is that it is non-violent and that no one gets hurt, especially our military members and police officers. The violent protesters, I have less concern for whether they get hurt or not. If they act out or resort to violence, then force is justified.
If only Nancy Pelosi would have taken Trump's advice in the lead up to Jan 6th and called the National Guard in for that event, there would have been no Jan 6th. I hear that Nancy is now denying her decision, even though there is video evidence.
 
Last edited:
Aren't you a life long military guy? Why so disparaging to the military? Is it a military branch rivalry issue or do you hate the military? I appreciate their willingness to serve and I suspect they will have things controlled fairly well in short order. My hope is that it is non-violent and that no one gets hurt, especially our military members and police officers. The violent protesters, I have less concern for whether they get hurt or not. If they act out or resort to violence, then force is justified.

It’s a common inter service jab. They are a bunch of crayon eating jar heads. I’ll give him a pass here.
 
Aren't you a life long military guy? Why so disparaging to the military? Is it a military branch rivalry issue or do you hate the military? I appreciate their willingness to serve and I suspect they will have things controlled fairly well in short order. My hope is that it is non-violent and that no one gets hurt, especially our military members and police officers. The violent protesters, I have less concern for whether they get hurt or not. If they act out or resort to violence, then force is justified.
If only Nancy Pelosi would have taken Trump's advice in the lead up to Jan 6th and called the National Guard in for that event, there would have been no Jan 6th. I hear that Nancy is now denying her decision, even though there is video evidence.

One can be a "military guy" and still think using marines for domestic peace-keeping is a terrible idea. I've spoken to a few both current and former marines who hate this (both for the Marines and for the people of LA).

Marines are trained to kill. Plain and simple. Their training is focused on giving them the skills and mentality to terminate the enemies of the state. With the possible exception of MPs, they are not trained to de-escalate. They are not trained to protect and serve the people. In the circumstances where the police are not able to keep the peace, the national guard is an option (though even then a very escalatory one).

To quote one of my favorite TV shows (BSG):
"There's a reason you separate military and the police. One fights the enemies of the state. The other serves and protects the people. When the military becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the people."
 
Marines are trained to kill. Plain and simple. Their training is focused on giving them the skills and mentality to terminate the enemies of the state.

To quote one of my favorite TV shows (BSG):
"There's a reason you separate military and the police. One fights the enemies of the state. The other serves and protects the people. When the military becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the people."


I think you watch too many TV shows. Like 80% of the military isn’t even combat arms.
 
I think you watch too many TV shows. Like 80% of the military isn’t even combat arms.
I think you're trying very, very hard to convince yourself that using active military in this role is just another day at the office for them.

This is not OK.
 
I heard it best from a Navy doc on one of my rotations while treating an autistic patient "Mildly autistic...like every good marine."
The best part is the Marines embrace it too. There was a staff sergeant at my battalion who kept a few Crayolas mixed in with the jar of candy on his desk.
 
I think you're trying very, very hard to convince yourself that using active military in this role is just another day at the office for them.

This is not OK.


Maybe, I haven’t really thought hard about it till recently. I can say for sure I think it’s at the very least a weak case to mobilize marines and there definitely is some truth that the guys who aren’t trained in crowd control operations are most likely going to screw something up. I also think there is some inaccuracies circulating in what the military’s role is. That’s a much smaller hill to defend.
 
I think you're trying very, very hard to convince yourself that using active military in this role is just another day at the office for them.

This is not OK.
The sad thing is that is is OK for them--you can see that the ardent members of the right are in full support of military deployment domestically. They seem completely incapable of criticizing anything Trump does, it is all or nothing. When the military gets deployed next time (because it absolutely will) then it will be just a normal thing this country does as we descend in to a fascist police state to the loud cheers of the party that used to believe in patriotism.
 
One can be a "military guy" and still think using marines for domestic peace-keeping is a terrible idea. I've spoken to a few both current and former marines who hate this (both for the Marines and for the people of LA).

Marines are trained to kill. Plain and simple. Their training is focused on giving them the skills and mentality to terminate the enemies of the state. With the possible exception of MPs, they are not trained to de-escalate. They are not trained to protect and serve the people. In the circumstances where the police are not able to keep the peace, the national guard is an option (though even then a very escalatory one).

To quote one of my favorite TV shows (BSG):
"There's a reason you separate military and the police. One fights the enemies of the state. The other serves and protects the people. When the military becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the people."
The point is, he could have expressed that without being disparaging.
 
Maybe, I haven’t really thought hard about it till recently. I can say for sure I think it’s at the very least a weak case to mobilize marines and there definitely is some truth that the guys who aren’t trained in crowd control operations are most likely going to screw something up. I also think there is some inaccuracies circulating in what the military’s role is. That’s a much smaller hill to defend.

I also wonder about morale among active duty Marines being utilized in what is obviously political theater.
 
"Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has unveiled eight people he has chosen to serve on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's vaccine advisory panel – just two days after taking the unprecedented step of removing all 17 sitting members."

Here are some of his selections:

"Malone has gained a large following for undermining the COVID-19 vaccine. A scientist who worked on early research into the mRNA technology, he became critical of the shot and made baseless and disproven claims, including falsely stating that getting vaccinated puts people who have already had COVID-19 at higher risk."

"Vicky Pebsworth, has served on the board of the National Vaccine Information Center — a prominent advocacy group that warns against vaccine risks."

"Dr. Retsef Levi, who's at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, has stoked concerns about the shots. In a social media post in early 2023, Levi said that all "COVID mRNA vaccination program should stop immediately…because they completely fail to fulfill any of their advertised promises regarding efficacy" and there was "mounting and indisputable evidence that they cause unprecedented levels of harm, including the death of young people and children."

"Kennedy's decision to replace the entire roster of the ACIP jolted the public health and medical establishment, who feared the move cleared the way for a committee that will take steps to undermine vaccine policy."

 
"Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has unveiled eight people he has chosen to serve on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's vaccine advisory panel – just two days after taking the unprecedented step of removing all 17 sitting members."

Here are some of his selections:

"Malone has gained a large following for undermining the COVID-19 vaccine. A scientist who worked on early research into the mRNA technology, he became critical of the shot and made baseless and disproven claims, including falsely stating that getting vaccinated puts people who have already had COVID-19 at higher risk."

"Vicky Pebsworth, has served on the board of the National Vaccine Information Center — a prominent advocacy group that warns against vaccine risks."

"Dr. Retsef Levi, who's at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, has stoked concerns about the shots. In a social media post in early 2023, Levi said that all "COVID mRNA vaccination program should stop immediately…because they completely fail to fulfill any of their advertised promises regarding efficacy" and there was "mounting and indisputable evidence that they cause unprecedented levels of harm, including the death of young people and children."

"Kennedy's decision to replace the entire roster of the ACIP jolted the public health and medical establishment, who feared the move cleared the way for a committee that will take steps to undermine vaccine policy."

Conservatives will still support this regime.
 
I don’t really understand the Botox and lip filler look. I guess some guys like it?
As much as I still don’t understand women even being married 16 years. I do know that women do Botox not to impress men. But to impress other women. That’s the simple truth I’ve been told by multiple women.
 
Top