• Practice your interview with the new SDN AI Interview Coach. Choose a school, answer by voice or typing, and receive a personalized feedback report. Available now to all SDN members. Try the AI Interview Coach.

BRAC and Army medicine

Started by idq1i
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

idq1i

Full Member
20+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Any opinions on the most recent BRAC report that included WRAMC and BAMC as tagets for "realignment"?

I have this nagging feeling that i'll be packing my bags for a mandatory GMO tour 2 years from now...
 
idq1i said:
Any opinions on the most recent BRAC report that included WRAMC and BAMC as tagets for "realignment"?

I have this nagging feeling that i'll be packing my bags for a mandatory GMO tour 2 years from now...

Wally-World will be reduced to a shadow of it's former self, with virtually all training programs and (I believe) inpatient services being transferred to Bethesda, to be renamed.

BAMC is absorbing the Air Force inpatients and training programs from Wilford Hall, which is being turned into an outpatient facility/clinic. In fact, the BRAC has all Air Force facilities losing their inpatient services, to become nothing more than clinics or same-day surgery facilities. This includes Keesler and Travis AFBs, along with Wilford Hall.
 
This seems like an improvement for everyone. NNMC and Walter Reed merge into Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. Army and Navy residents enjoy more patient volume and only one location and it keeps the good WR name. Better for USUHS rotations as well.

Same with switching centers to clinics and eliminating centers; gets rid of those terrible billets where skills atrophy. Maybe military medicine will return to where it once was in terms of training quality etc...
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
DCM said:
This seems like an improvement for everyone. NNMC and Walter Reed merge into Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. Army and Navy residents enjoy more patient volume and only one location and it keeps the good WR name. Better for USUHS rotations as well.

Same with switching centers to clinics and eliminating centers; gets rid of those terrible billets where skills atrophy. Maybe military medicine will return to where it once was in terms of training quality etc...

What about the number of residency slots available in-service? Will the DoD still have a GME program 5-10 years from now?
 
idq1i said:
What about the number of residency slots available in-service? Will the DoD still have a GME program 5-10 years from now?

YES!

The Surgeon General of the Navy spoke at USUHS a couple of months ago and was very emphatic on the point that GME training was not going away. Now he could always be pulling our chains, but I doubt it, he was very clear on that point.
 
I agree yes. The rumors here at the Pentagon are that these changes are supposed to improve GME and solidify military's commitment to it.