Can I wear this to a CVS interview?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
How hard is it to listen from people who have gone through this before?

Bottlecap, how is it you took more than 40 posts to get even halfway decent?

Seriously, get it through your thick skull - wear business formal (shirt, slacks, tie). No rolling up the sleeves. This is not the time to relax - it's time to be pro. This is pro in the real world.

First job interview? I'm sure, even if you have no job interview experience, it would make sense - either from seeing these situations on TV or asking friends in real life (if you have any). I'm sorry... I guess it's because all people grow up in different situations. But still, more than 40 posts, and you can't have gone with what people been saying in the first 4 or 5.

Glad you're on probationary status. You're damn close to crossing the trolling line.


lol. I do have job interview experience but not at CVS. I used to work at abercrombie and hollister and they required us to wear their clothes. My brother was once interviewed by stop & shop supermarket for a stock person and he only wore a t-shirt and a pair of jeans.

I am not trying to ARGUE, I am just asking if it is ok to do this or that
 
I've worked at a CVS for a little over 5 years, and you will be interviewing at a CVS. So take me seriously when I say ...

Please please PLEASE COMPLETELY TUCK IN YOUR SHIRT.

I know it looks weird because you're not used to it, but if you leave the "belly flap" by pulling out some of the shirt you just tucked in, it looks worse than had you not tucked in your shirt at all. When you tuck in your shirt, do **NOT** raise your arms up like superman to get some of the slack back out of the slacks.

TUCK IN YOUR SHIRT COMPLETELY. You may think you look weird but that's the way it should be.

Huh? Are you talking about where after you tuck the shirt in, you pull the shirt back up to make the upper body look longer?


bottlecap1990 said:
lol. I do have job interview experience but not at CVS. I used to work at abercrombie and hollister and they required us to wear their clothes. My brother was once interviewed by stop & shop supermarket for a stock person and he only wore a t-shirt and a pair of jeans.

I am not trying to ARGUE, I am just asking if it is ok to do this or that

CVS isn't Abercrombie or Hollister. This is what I wore to my interview, and I ended up with a job at CVS with it.

Dress Shoes + Matching Belt, Slacks, Dress Shirt.
 
I was referring to what to wear to an interview. Personally I think a polo and jeans are far to lax



Rule of thumb that I use, white shirts need a tie. If you have a colored shirt, you can go without one, just leave the top button undone and consider wearing an undershirt. Personally though I would never interview without a tie.

To be honest, the pic you posted was about 75% of the way to looking guido. If you walked into my pharmacy like that (I used to help due interviews) you would get marked down for it. It looks like you did a half assed job getting dressed and generally it kinda makes you look like a punk.

And you're dad is a lawyer, but that doesn't mean he's the fashion police of the entire business world.

And you could do a polo if you absolutely must. But it has to be a nice, pressed polo. No curled up collars, no giant ass A&F logo, just a plain, nice
polo


Which picture? the one with black polo?

AND
is that avatar really you?
 
Last edited:
lol. I do have job interview experience but not at CVS. I used to work at abercrombie and hollister and they required us to wear their clothes. My brother was once interviewed by stop & shop supermarket for a stock person and he only wore a t-shirt and a pair of jeans.

I am not trying to ARGUE, I am just asking if it is ok to do this or that

Why are you applying to CVS anyway? Don't you know just by reading all the posts on here that CVS is a terrible company to work for?
 
Why are you applying to CVS anyway? Don't you know just by reading all the posts on here that CVS is a terrible company to work for?

I believe (not sure) CVS is the only company who offers training for becoming a pharmacy technician. I have ZERO experience. I tried walgreens but they are not looking for people at the moment.
 
Once you have done the interview, do you find out right away if you get the job? Or do you get a call later? again I have no idea how this works so I was just wondering.

I actually had to call them to schedule the interview. I called them up and spoke to the pharmacy manager. She was like "Oh yeah I have your application ready. When are you free? I answered tomorrow. And she was like how about tomorrow afternoon? I said ok. Then she said "Ok we'll have a little chat tomorrow).

so yeah.
 
Once you have done the interview, do you find out right away if you get the job? Or do you get a call later? again I have no idea how this works so I was just wondering.

I actually had to call them to schedule the interview. I called them up and spoke to the pharmacy manager. She was like "Oh yeah I have your application ready. When are you free? I answered tomorrow. And she was like how about tomorrow afternoon? I said ok. Then she said "Ok we'll have a little chat tomorrow).

so yeah.

Most often they will call you back later. Sometimes you can be hired on the spot though. I am really happy for you to get this interview. Please wear a dress shirt + tie (and dress pants)! It's the uniform so it would be odd to dress more casual for the interview then you would for work. Good Luck! Looking forward to the "How do you think my interview went?" thread!
 
is that avatar really you?

Yes, I am a young, blonde female with a propensity to make smart ass-y faces

I believe (not sure) CVS is the only company who offers training for becoming a pharmacy technician. I have ZERO experience. I tried walgreens but they are not looking for people at the moment.


Uh... no. Virtually all places offer training.
 
I will add that a friend hired at Wal-Mart interviewed and was given the job in the same day. He knew before he walked out that he was hired.

Wal-Mart has no real training program for its techs. They have mandatory CBL (computer based learning) modules that have to be done in-store, but they're primarily to familiarize the tech with the Connexus system. There is no formal training program, so people have to learn on the job, and quickly.
 
Anyway, once you actually get the job at CVS, just dress the way your supervisor says. If they are okay with jeans, then wear jeans if you want. (Might wanna keep a change of uniform clothes in your car though, in the rare case that the higher ups in the company decide to drop by.)
 
i interviewed at CVS this past Friday and I asked what the dress code was for pharmacy techs. I was told business casual was the norm...all the techs were wearing nice pants with comfy shoes. for an interview, dress to impress! nice button down shirt tucked in, dress pants, nice shoes..pretty much what everyone has been saying🙂

i was told i would be contacted by phone if they would like to offer me employment but he (the pharmacy manager) told me if i didn't hear anything in two weeks then i wasn't selected.
 
lol. I do have job interview experience but not at CVS. I used to work at abercrombie and hollister and they required us to wear their clothes. My brother was once interviewed by stop & shop supermarket for a stock person and he only wore a t-shirt and a pair of jeans.

I am not trying to ARGUE, I am just asking if it is ok to do this or that
Please, please wear jeans! And a crumpled old t-shirts (stains are welcome, too!). Your posts strongly suggest you are NOT the person I would want to hire, so I wouldn't want to inflict you on some hapless pharmacist either. You sound like you are still in high school, and most pharmacists I know do not enjoy playing babysitters.
 
Please, please wear jeans! And a crumpled old t-shirts (stains are welcome, too!). Your posts strongly suggest you are NOT the person I would want to hire, so I wouldn't want to inflict you on some hapless pharmacist either. You sound like you are still in high school, and most pharmacists I know do not enjoy playing babysitters.


Thank you very much.
 
Do I really need a tie? I don't have any plain dress shirt so am I supposed to go out and buy one just for the interview? Please be realistic.
just because it is from abercrombie then I can't wear it? COME ON MAN. Abercrombie have shirts like you showed me. :scared:
Yes! Why not buy an outfit for a professional interview seeing as you obviously don't already have one? You really think you will never have to dress up for another occasion that you could rewear that outfit? ... Like pharmacy school interviews? I bought a suit for interviews and I wore the same one for every interview and wear the pants as a separate for work clothes. It's like an investment for a nice dress outfit. Also, the dress code at Rite Aid for guys requires a tie. Definitely wear a tie to be safe.
 
Huh? I thought the military uses brown, green, and white ACUs.

And blue and yellow.

I was intel, so we only had mint green!

Edit: It occurs to me that you might be serious, and talking about BDUs, the ACU's predecessor. IN the BDU, there were 2 main patterns... camouflage (the ugly ass green/brown) and then desert (the white/green, lighter color). By the time I got out of AIT (my 2nd training), and into DLI, we all had ACUs, which were 1 color on matter your deployment or unit. In the "woodland camo" of the green/brown, there were Summer and Winter, which both had slightly different colors, and the Summer one had little white lines (kind of like 1/10th size pinstripes). It's a much lighter material.
 
And blue and yellow.

I was intel, so we only had mint green!

Edit: It occurs to me that you might be serious, and talking about BDUs, the ACU's predecessor. IN the BDU, there were 2 main patterns... camouflage (the ugly ass green/brown) and then desert (the white/green, lighter color). By the time I got out of AIT (my 2nd training), and into DLI, we all had ACUs, which were 1 color on matter your deployment or unit. In the "woodland camo" of the green/brown, there were Summer and Winter, which both had slightly different colors, and the Summer one had little white lines (kind of like 1/10th size pinstripes). It's a much lighter material.

Don't you guys also have arctic warfare uniforms?

Spec4ce-uni-Arctic-White-100-90deg-95hl.jpg
 
Don't you guys also have arctic warfare uniforms?

Spec4ce-uni-Arctic-White-100-90deg-95hl.jpg


I've never seen anyone, ever wear that.

I don't have my 670-1 manual anymore so I can't say if those are actually authorized or not. They might fall into the special unit stuff I mentioned above... but they are not part of RFI/standard issue. At all.

Looking closely at the pattern leads me to believe those are actually Marine Corps "digital" pattern. CLOSELY resembles ACU... but not quite.

Editx2: Thinking about it even more, that can't be a legit uniform, because 670-1 explicitly states that ALL boots worn with the ACU will be tan in color... no matter if they are aftermarket or issue. So... that can't be US Army.
 
Last edited:
I've never seen anyone, ever wear that.

I don't have my 670-1 manual anymore so I can't say if those are actually authorized or not. They might fall into the special unit stuff I mentioned above... but they are not part of RFI/standard issue. At all.

Looking closely at the pattern leads me to believe those are actually Marine Corps "digital" pattern. CLOSELY resembles ACU... but not quite.

Editx2: Thinking about it even more, that can't be a legit uniform, because 670-1 explicitly states that ALL boots worn with the ACU will be tan in color... no matter if they are aftermarket or issue. So... that can't be US Army.

Probably special forces then. Does the USA have any units operating in arctic regions? I suppose this would be standard issue when we decide to invade Moscow.
 
I wore a nice White polo, pair of khaki slacks, and a pair of nice walking shoes (You'll be standing all day).

I would recommend a nice dress shirt and tie. It sounds like overdressing, but the interviewer always likes a nice sense of professional respect for the job
 
Probably special forces then. Does the USA have any units operating in arctic regions? I suppose this would be standard issue when we decide to invade Moscow.

I'm sure there are some units somewhere in arctic conditions, but not in "big army" - Undoubtedly SoF has unique stuff (as I mentioned before). But for 99% of soldiers, the mint green hook and loop ACU is what we've got.
 
Hey man, I went through this same thing and I used to think the same way as you did. But you gotta listen to the advice. Because your 20, and they probably know that by your application and since you probably look young, you HAVE to show lots of maturity. Maybe if you were older you might get away with the polo and no a no tie (as other people have) but I'm telling you one of the biggest turn offs in hiring someone is immaturity and lack of experience.

One of my biggest problems I had getting a job was that I look younger than my age. I had to make up for this by dressing up some more levels. You gotta look like you are pro and you know what you are doing. Also confidence is very important.

It would help to see your face as well so we could get a perspective of how old you look (at least in my opinion) and how you are doing your hair but I can understand the censorship. But anyway...

Bottom Line:
. DO NOT wear that polo shirt or those black sneakers
. The white shirt does not look so good... its def WAY better than that polo though
. DO NOT roll up those sleeves! Especially like the way you did it in your picture.
. DEFINITELY wear a tie, this is a MUST. I'm telling you, especially because your 20 and probably look younger, show some maturity.
. You are going to have to get used to dressing like this more often, so get used to it and stock up NOW.

What I would recommend:
1. Buy two NICE dress shirts that go with those black pants.
2. Get some ties (nothing too loud, must be business looking, remember your not going to a club)
3. Get a couple pairs of long black business socks.
4. Get a watch! This is KEY if you want to look legit, I'm serious. I bought mine for $10 (from a $10 store) and it looks like its worth around $60.
5. Invest in an iron and ironing board if you don't have one already ($50 at wal-mart)



Let us know how the interview goes, good luck! 👍


EDIT: eh, I'm a little late. Good job on the interview!
 
Last edited:
I've always tried to figure out what is the origin of the tie and why people even wear them?

Edit: and I found the origin. Not what I thought it would be, but it's because of a bunch of Croatians.
The cravat is a neckband, the forerunner of the modern tailored necktie and bow tie, originating from 17th century Croatia.
From the end of the 16th century, the term band applied to any long-strip neckcloth that was not a ruff. The ruff, a starched, pleated white linen strip, started its fashion career earlier in the 16th century as a neckcloth (readily changeable, to minimize the soiling of a doublet), as a bib, or as a napkin. A band could be either a plain, attached shirt collar or a detachable "falling band" that draped over the doublet collar. It is possible that cravats were initially worn to hide shirts which were not immaculately clean.[1]"


The cravat originated in the 1630s; like most men's fashions between the 17th century and World War I, it was of military origin. In the reign of Louis XIII of France, Croatian mercenaries [2] were enlisted into a regiment supporting the King and Cardinal Richelieu against the Duc de Guise and the Queen Mother, Marie de Medici. The traditional Croat military kit aroused Parisian curiosity about the unusual, picturesque scarves distinctively knotted at the Croats' necks; the cloths that were used, ranged from the coarse cloths of enlisted soldiers, to the fine linens and silks of the officers. The sartorial word "cravat" derives from the French "cravate," a corrupt French pronunciation of "Croat" — in Croatian, "Hr̀vāt".
Considering the interdependence of many European regions (particularly the French) with the Venetian Republic, which occupied most of Croatia's coast, and the word's uncertain philologic origin, the new male neckdress was known as a cravate. The French readily switched from old-fashioned starched linen ruffs to the new loose linen and muslin cravates; the military styles often had broad, laced edges, while a gentleman's cravat could be of fine lace. As an extreme example of the style, the sculptor Grinling Gibbons carved a realistic cravat in white limewood which is now on display at Chatsworth House.
On returning to England from exile in 1660, Charles II imported with him the latest new word in fashion: "A cravatte is another kind of adornment for the neck being nothing else but a long towel put about the Collar, and so tyed before with a Bow Knott; this is the original of all such Wearings; but now by the Art and Inventions of the seamsters, there is so many new ways of making them, that it would be a task to name, much more to describe them". (Randle Holme, Academy of Armory and Blazon, 1688.)
During the wars of Louis XIV of 1689–1697, except for court, the flowing cravat was replaced with the more current and equally military "Steinkirk", named after the Battle of Steenkerque in 1692. The Steinkirk was a long, narrow, plain or lightly trimmed neckcloth worn with military dress, wrapped once about the neck in a loose knot, with the lace of fringed ends twisted together and tucked out of the way into a button-hole, either of the coat or the waistcoat. The steinkirk was popular with men and women until the 1720s.
The maccaronis reintroduced the flowing cravat in the 1770s, and the manner of a man's knotting it became indicative of his taste and style, to the extent that after the Battle of Waterloo (1815) the cravat, itself, was referred to as a "tie".



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cravat
 
Last edited:
Top