- Joined
- Aug 24, 2012
- Messages
- 1,833
- Reaction score
- 3,528
Story made front page of CNN. Did not realize this was known nationally by non medical people.
Double down with LOIs and beg for admission.How do dartmouth med school applicants react?
The Ivy League name probably makes it more interesting. The fact that this is going onto so many major outlets is going to put quite a bit of pressure onto Dartmouth's university level leadershipStory made front page of CNN. Did not realize this was known nationally by non medical people.
Fire both is my suggestionWhy are we firing IT for being idiots when they were explicitly asked by the deans to do something out of their realm of expertise?? What would you do if you asked do do something challenging, quit on the spot? Educational tech and maintenance =/= cybersecurity.
Blame Duane Compton et al, the ones who decided to start this mission and act on this data, not somebody with an associate or bachelor's in IT management/Ed tech
That allows sadistic, malicious administrators and deans to continue carrying out their brutal, corrupt crackdown on med students and trainees for effectively anything. Clearly there are limitations to their power as Dartmouth scandal has shownPeople reading this thread need to realize they can always hurt you more. Take your win and realize there's a long ways left to go before you're done with training. Before you're board eligible you're completely at the mercy of the system.
I would love it if someone could get their hands on the Dartmouth Student Policy Handbook. It's password protected (and I'm not at Dartmouth).The deans jumped to drastic, career affecting conclusions based on incorrect information and assumptions. The IT guys being fired for being incompetent idiots is guaranteed but the deans made a hasty decision and gave their school a very bad look. They should also be fired and replaced.
The Ivy League name probably makes it more interesting.
First he's getting cancelled, and now this...i did not know Darmouth’s medical school was named after Dr Seuss.
Isn't that the fault of the IT for not knowing how Canvas works?I would love it if someone could get their hands on the Dartmouth Student Policy Handbook. It's password protected (and I'm not at Dartmouth).
The handbook will describe in detail who is officially responsible for this mess. The major deans are typically insulated from these proceedings, and this is an excellent illustration of why that is. The dean and/or academic affairs dean are frequently involved in appeals, particularly of dismissals, but often the only dean directly involved in the conduct committee (or whatever) is the student affairs dean, who usually acts as a student advocate. It would be interesting to see how Dartmouth actually structures its process.
If I were an accused student I would probably bypass suing the school and instead file a large civil suit against Canvas. One of the more curious things about this whole situation is that Canvas is used by thousands, if not millions, of students worldwide, but of all places the blowup occurred at an Ivy League medical school in Lebanon, NH.
When I first heard about all this I thought it would be a routine remote cheating situation, just on a larger scale. Traditionally it isn't actually that difficult to see that Jimmy downloaded the cardiovascular physiology slides while taking the cardiovascular physiology test.Isn't that the fault of the IT for not knowing how Canvas works?
Agreed the student handbook would be useful. I don't have it either
I don't have the handbook, however I can attest that even as late as May, most associate Deans were not fully aware of what exactly happened (and this took place in March). From the students I have been in contact with, I discerned that most of the faculty and even a large part of the admin were on their side in this whole fiasco.I would love it if someone could get their hands on the Dartmouth Student Policy Handbook. It's password protected (and I'm not at Dartmouth).
The handbook will describe in detail who is officially responsible for this mess. The major deans are typically insulated from these proceedings, and this is an excellent illustration of why that is. The dean and/or academic affairs dean are frequently involved in appeals, particularly of dismissals, but often the only dean directly involved in the conduct committee (or whatever) is the student affairs dean, who usually acts as a student advocate. It would be interesting to see how Dartmouth actually structures its process.
If I were an accused student I would probably bypass suing the school and instead file a large civil suit against Canvas. One of the more curious things about this whole situation is that Canvas is used by thousands, if not millions, of students worldwide, but of all places the blowup occurred at an Ivy League medical school in Lebanon, NH.
Probably the last thing on those students' minds rnWait if the students are falsely accused of cheating and got their charges dismissed, are they still in the running for AOA, or are their chances zero because the admin hates them?
I would love it if someone could get their hands on the Dartmouth Student Policy Handbook. It's password protected (and I'm not at Dartmouth).
The handbook will describe in detail who is officially responsible for this mess. The major deans are typically insulated from these proceedings, and this is an excellent illustration of why that is. The dean and/or academic affairs dean are frequently involved in appeals, particularly of dismissals, but often the only dean directly involved in the conduct committee (or whatever) is the student affairs dean, who usually acts as a student advocate. It would be interesting to see how Dartmouth actually structures its process.
If I were an accused student I would probably bypass suing the school and instead file a large civil suit against Canvas. One of the more curious things about this whole situation is that Canvas is used by thousands, if not millions, of students worldwide, but of all places the blowup occurred at an Ivy League medical school in Lebanon, NH.
I doubt there is a case against Canvas. Canvas doesn’t promote their software as a cheating prevention/detection tool. The monitoring/logging of activity is surely in the EULA. Dartmouth went off label in how it is applied. It would be like suing a car manufacturer that your car didn’t work as a submarine.
The deans jumped to drastic, career affecting conclusions based on incorrect information and assumptions. The IT guys being fired for being incompetent idiots is guaranteed but the deans made a hasty decision and gave their school a very bad look. They should also be fired and replaced.
I definitely believe the deans should be at least aware of the technology that's been used for over a year throughout the pandemic. The IT guys should be fired for being idiots in the first place but an apology isn't enough for what appears to be a dramatic authoritarian crackdown from the deans.I mean yeah, but it’s not like they knew the information was incorrect. They were relying on their subject matter experts to provide the right information. You think the dean knows more about IT than the IT department? Now if the IT department said oh **** we ****ed up, and the deans said keep it quiet so we don’t look bad, that’s a different story. Otherwise I’m not sure how else you expect them to respond other than canceling the penalties and apologizing.
That's right.I definitely believe the deans should be at least aware of the technology that's been used for over a year throughout the pandemic. The IT guys should be fired for being idiots in the first place but an apology isn't enough for what appears to be a dramatic authoritarian crackdown from the deans.
Even one of the associate deans was said to be going on a warpath. Dartmouth legit looks like a dictatorship and a lot of heads from admins must roll for this disaster
Ok that was good lolThat's right.
Find Eleazar Wheelock's descendants and sue them.
Then sue God.
Heads must roll.
Seriously though, the adage "two wrongs don't make a right" is apt here.Ok that was good lol
While this is true, isn't the job of the deans to ensure their school doesn't get a bad image? They failed on that step by overreacting and got humiliated by the media. This is worsened by the fact that they effectively destroyed all trust they had with students.Seriously though, the adage "two wrongs don't make a right" is apt here.
It appears that Dartmouth got itself into trouble by overreacting to bad/partial information. Another overreaction isn't going to fix the problem. Hopefully someone with authority and a cool head will take a look at the situation and determine who screwed up, how badly they screwed up, and why they screwed up. Then a corrective process can be thoughtfully devised an implemented. I imagine some people will get axed before it's all over, but we'll have to wait and see.
It's true that the buck usually stops at the top, but without knowing the players, the process, and how things went awry, it's impossible to differentiate baby from bathwater.While this is true, isn't the job of the deans to ensure their school doesn't get a bad image? They failed on that step by overreacting and got humiliated by the media. This is worsened by the fact that they effectively destroyed all trust they had with students.
A change in leadership will help all parties move on for the better
Thanks for the nightmareIt's true that the buck usually stops at the top, but without knowing the players, the process, and how things went awry, it's impossible to differentiate baby from bathwater.
Besides, and indiscriminate purge isn't a great recruiting tool for the next bunch of leaders. Sort of like performing vasectomies with garden shears.
Definitely permanent and effective.Sort of like performing vasectomies with garden shears.
M935 plsDefinitely permanent and effective.
I don't buy that. They tried to ruin several peoples lives for what turned out to be no reason. Losing their jobs after that is the minimum consequence that should happen. They'll find another job, hopefully at a lesser position, and ideally learn not to aggressively over react again. That is so much less than they were going to do to their students who had spent years of hard work to earn IV league scores and positions.Seriously though, the adage "two wrongs don't make a right" is apt here.
It appears that Dartmouth got itself into trouble by overreacting to bad/partial information. Another overreaction isn't going to fix the problem. Hopefully someone with authority and a cool head will take a look at the situation and determine who screwed up, how badly they screwed up, and why they screwed up. Then a corrective process can be thoughtfully devised an implemented. I imagine some people will get axed before it's all over, but we'll have to wait and see.
Define "they."I don't buy that. They tried to ruin several peoples lives for what turned out to be no reason. Losing their jobs after that is the minimum consequence that should happen. They'll find another job, hopefully at a lesser position, and ideally learn not to aggressively over react again. That is so much less than they were going to do to their students who had spent years of hard work to earn IV league scores and positions.
Thoughts on this?Define "they."
Edit: Dartmouth has the following senior positions in medical education:
The Committee on Student Performance and Conduct has 11 faculty (8 physicians, 2 PhDs, 1 MSW) and 2 students.
- Interim senior associate dean for medical education
- Associate dean for clinical education
- Associate dean for student affairs
- Associate dean for preclinical education
- Associate dean for biomedical science integration
Doubtful. Dartmouth was advertising for this long before the scandal happened.Is it related to the scandal?
Pursue everyone? Choose at random? Or maybe fire everyone who gets scared and apologizes at the promise of leniency? Either option would be equivalent to what they did. They didn't care that there were over a dozen people involved. That some of them had made a mistake. Or that most to all of them did nothing wrong at all.Define "they."
Edit: Dartmouth has the following senior positions in medical education:
The Committee on Student Performance and Conduct has 11 faculty (8 physicians, 2 PhDs, 1 MSW) and 2 students.
- Interim senior associate dean for medical education
- Associate dean for clinical education
- Associate dean for student affairs
- Associate dean for preclinical education
- Associate dean for biomedical science integration
Since this is just a forum and not a court of law, I'm sure the poster's use of "they" was simply meant to mean whoever was responsible.Define "they."
Edit: Dartmouth has the following senior positions in medical education:
The Committee on Student Performance and Conduct has 11 faculty (8 physicians, 2 PhDs, 1 MSW) and 2 students.
- Interim senior associate dean for medical education
- Associate dean for clinical education
- Associate dean for student affairs
- Associate dean for preclinical education
- Associate dean for biomedical science integration