- Joined
- Mar 13, 2012
- Messages
- 6,825
- Reaction score
- 8,811
Do you have any previous versions which indicate a 98% minimum placement rate? Because the document you posted indicates that there was no minimum previously.
The prior document (that I do have saved somewhere in the recesses of my laptop), states that schools are expected to demonstrate a 98% placement rate, but didn't state that it was an actionable requirement. The current modification implies that it is a requirement, which COCA can in turn act upon. It clarifies the point slightly as well. Its not great that they reduced it to 95%, but a slightly more lax clear requirement is better than a recommendation, in my opinion at least.
COCA doesn't benefit from the failure of schools. There's no reason why they wouldn't enforce a requirement like that. If anything fees due to violations and reapplication for accreditation would net them more money.
EDIT: Yeah, apparently I also forgot that the previous recommendation was for 98% average over 3 years, whereas the new one is 95% annually. I talk about it a bit in this thread: http://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/coca-proposed-accreditation-changes.1137053/
Last edited: