HighPriest, my interpretation of swoopyswoop's story is one of nurses paging them for a patient known to their service. Of course, a new consult always requires an attending-to-attending conversation. However, if you, the ENT physician, performed a tracheostomy on one of my patients, and the patient now has some bleeding around the trach site, that's not something I'm going to be able to do much for. Same thing when the wound vac placed by ortho isn't working anymore. Or the high-grade SBO patient who was admitted to medicine for some reason is having worsening abdominal pain.
[LEFT][SIZE=14px][FONT=rubix][COLOR=rgb(0, 84, 104)]LucidSplash[/COLOR].[/SIZE][/LEFT], I find these threads to be tacky and distasteful. And frankly, it's kind of frustrating to know that you guys are happy to take our business and dump your patients on our service but then go behind our backs to complain about us not wanting to change your dressings for you or troubleshoot your wound vacs.
Also, not that your collegiality should be predicated on a desire for more business, but ten years ago we (hospitalists) had a lot of trouble getting PEGs and trachs done by the one surgical group in town. Guess who stepped up to do all of those? IR. They take these patients no questions asked. Hell, interventional cardiology has mostly edged out vascular surgery where I live, for similar reasons. At the end of the day, I have to do what's right for the patient, and unlike surgeons I don't get to be picky about who my patients are. If IR, IC, and GI are willing to address the pathology without throwing a hissy fit every time we call them about a post-op issue, then they deserve our business.