Dare you to reply!

[CaesarRO]

---

Members don't see this ad.

Does anyone know what was said? I’m dying to know at this point

Supposedly it was this:

 

[RadOncDoc21]

Academia… a lot of thin skinned folks out there.

 

[RickyScott]

What a letdown. While a bit prickly, was expecting so much more.

 

[Lamount]

Supposedly it was this:

That’s a bit underwhelming. She was rude and came across as rude to the audience, which seems like a fitting punishment. No need to pretend it is huge deal on social media.

 

[Chartreuse Wombat]

That’s a bit underwhelming. She was rude and came across as rude to the audience, which seems like a fitting punishment. No need to pretend it is huge deal on social media.

But that is what social media is for. Faux outrage to increase clicks…er I mean engagement

 

[medgator]

That’s a bit underwhelming. She was rude and came across as rude to the audience, which seems like a fitting punishment. No need to pretend it is huge deal on social media.

Which doc was this... Doesn't mention in the video or tweet

 

[deleted1111261]

“Micro aggressions” = what exactly again?
Just being a jerk?

 

[metallica81788]

Without watching, I bet it wasn't as insulting as when LK told us to our faces at ASTRO that we were a bunch of *******es for failing Radbio and Physics. That was a macroaggression.

 

[deleted1111261]

 

[deleted1111261]

(I deleted it immediately, but I thought pretty funny!)

 

[Palex80]

These two trials are not so different…

One tests for genetic alterations upfront and assigns patients to two groups, the other looks at the data at the end.
Given the sample size it should still work out to draw conclusions. And what the audience member asks, is if testing later on with ctDNA may miss out patients that may have been positive had they been tested upfront (on tissue?).

I do not get the comment of the gray haired lady: „These two trials had very different patient populations“. Nope, they didn’t. Both were 1L-mCRPC treated with Abi +/- PARPi.

She was just being rude.

Here‘s an overview:

 

[jondunn]

 

[SubserviantToABR]

Without watching, I bet it wasn't as insulting as when LK told us to our faces at ASTRO that we were a bunch of *******es for failing Radbio and Physics. That was a macroaggression.

Seriously, I'm just glad there wasn't pitchforks at the door in San Antonio that day.

The scary part is that if this is how they act in public, what do they act like behind closed doors. I am not a medical oncologist, but I think it was a good, practical question. Maybe we shouldn't focus too much on DEI if this is what we get, but more focus on equity of decency.

 

[radiaterMike]

The person asking the question is a chair/ endowed professor. No clue who the grey haired panelist is. Maybe some history between them. The panelist who called them children (even though only one was acting that way) mumbled something about them knowing each other.

 

[TheWallnerus]

View attachment 350531

"Calling a cat a cat"

WHOOOAAAAA

 

[medgator]

"Calling a cat a cat"

WHOOOAAAAA

Innuendo for a different term?

 

[TheWallnerus]

Innuendo for a different term?

Unconscious bias

 

[brushbeamscanning]

Everybody has a little bit of unconscious bias.

 

[OTN]

Everybody has a little bit of unconscious bias.

So who are you biased against?

 

[brushbeamscanning]

So who are you biased against?

My Avenue Q reference was probably too vague.

 

[OTN]

My Avenue Q reference was probably too vague.

I am familiar with Avenue Q but haven't watched enough, so I did indeed miss it. I was referencing this:

 

[medgator]

I am familiar with Avenue Q but haven't watched enough, so I did indeed miss it. I was referencing this:

If it doesn't exist, then why all this?

Brian Flores explains why he used Bill Belichick's text messages in the lawsuit

Brian Flores entrenched Bill Belichick in the former Miami Dolphins coach's lawsuit alleging systemic racism in the NFL. Flores did that, because Belichick text messages were a perfect example of what was wrong with the NFL's hiring processes. Those texts became the top item…

patriotswire.usatoday.com

The content you are trying to access has expired from our website

www.floridarealtors.org

Maybe not everyone has it, but I'm sure plenty do

 

[OTN]

If it doesn't exist, then why all this?

Brian Flores explains why he used Bill Belichick's text messages in the lawsuit

Brian Flores entrenched Bill Belichick in the former Miami Dolphins coach's lawsuit alleging systemic racism in the NFL. Flores did that, because Belichick text messages were a perfect example of what was wrong with the NFL's hiring processes. Those texts became the top item…

patriotswire.usatoday.com

The content you are trying to access has expired from our website

www.floridarealtors.org

Maybe not everyone has it, but I'm sure plenty do

That I can agree with

 

[jondunn]

 

[RadOncDoc21]

He called her beautiful as well. Lebron James is a freak of nature. I’m the first to call out a racist comment, but not everything should be taken as offensive.

 

[Ray D. Ayshun]

He called her beautiful as well. Lebron James is a freak of nature. I’m the first to call out a racist comment, but not everything should be taken as offensive.

It's a woman who apparently makes her living off the color of her skin. My desire to not be in academic med is bc I'll bump into jack turbans. But maybe I'm the dingus.

 

[TheWallnerus]

Could have same such post about a Ferrari… “black beauty” “queen of dark” … and a chairman could say “I love dark black beauties like this”

CAN NOT have chairman say “I love dark black beauties” to this post though. In short, any response whatsoever is actually a trap!

 

[deleted941485]

Could have same such post about a Ferrari… “black beauty” “queen of dark” … and a chairman could say “I love dark black beauties like this”

CAN NOT have chairman say “I love dark black beauties” to this post though. In short, any response whatsoever is actually a trap!

This is why I still think it’s of no professional benefit for doctors employed in these systems to have a regular social media prescence.

You inevitably end up in situation where you are totally irrelevant or saying something so egregious you might actually get yourself fired.

This need to say something is literally killing peoples careers.

 

[RadOncDoc21]

This is why I still think it’s of no professional benefit for doctors employed in these systems to have a regular social media prescence.

You inevitably end up in situation where you are totally irrelevant or saying something so egregious you might actually get yourself fired.

This need to say something is literally killing peoples careers.

I know myself and this is the reason why I stay away from the public. I can’t go one hour without making some family guy/South Park type of joke or reference. I was meant to practice medicine in 1955.

 

[OTN]

This is why I still think it’s of no professional benefit for doctors employed in these systems to have a regular social media prescence.

You inevitably end up in situation where you are totally irrelevant or saying something so egregious you might actually get yourself fired.

This need to say something is literally killing peoples careers.

That's...why I'm here.

No need to have a non-anonymous social media presence unless you are a politician/entertainer/sportsball person for whom your brand is rather important.

 

[Krukenberg]

This is why I still think it’s of no professional benefit for doctors employed in these systems to have a regular social media prescence.

You inevitably end up in situation where you are totally irrelevant or saying something so egregious you might actually get yourself fired.

This need to say something is literally killing peoples careers.

It’s not just the risk of saying something that gets you in trouble, it can also be the act of NOT saying something that gets you criticism. Thinking of the BLM protests

 

[deleted941485]

It’s not just the risk of saying something that gets you in trouble, it can also be the act of NOT saying something that gets you criticism. Thinking of the BLM protests

Its a no win situation like most of medicine I guess.

 

[deleted1111261]

This book really nailed it for me.

Amazon product ASIN 1982129336
And, now, reading people like Bari Weiss - I realize that this illiberality is going to be the end of us.

 

[TheWallnerus]

It’s not just the risk of saying something that gets you in trouble, it can also be the act of NOT saying something that gets you criticism. Thinking of the BLM protests

Never de novo comment, still. But be sure to retweet the "correct" people... take a woke person's tweet that has aged well for 48+h w/ universal aplomb and retweet it. It's so simple to get and maintain membership in The Club. For style points, retweet with a "So true" comment or "I needed this today!".

 

[Lamount]

Never de novo comment, still. But be sure to retweet the "correct" people... take a woke person's tweet that has aged well for 48+h w/ universal aplomb and retweet it. It's so simple to get and maintain membership in The Club. For style points, retweet with a "So true" comment or "I needed this today!".

Don't forget 🙌

 

[Lamount]

This book really nailed it for me.

Amazon product ASIN 1982129336
And, now, reading people like Bari Weiss - I realize that this illiberality is going to be the end of us.

I am **cautiously** optimistic that we have have witnessed peek wokeness and that the pendulum may be swinging back toward equilibrium, as evidenced by Spotify and Netflix supporting Rogan and Chapelle, respectively.

I can't say I agree with everything these two have said but I sure as hell don't want to live in a society where disagreeing with the mainstream opinion is sufficient cause for banishment

 

[communitydoc13]

Rogan and Chapelle

Do these folks ever get "cancelled"? I mean really. I see comedians with ridiculous NETFLIX contracts complain about getting cancelled or Rogan with his ridiculous contract. Chappelle is a great social commentator but a lot of this content that is questioned revolves around his sense of victimization. He's not getting cancelled.

Rogan is an example of the negative impact of democratization of serious content. It's fine that he's on but also fine that Neil Young is like "eff this platform". He's not getting cancelled.

Now SDN is an example of the positive impact of democratization. More likely that we would get "cancelled".

 

[Ray D. Ayshun]

Do these folks ever get "cancelled"? I mean really. I see comedians with ridiculous NETFLIX contracts complain about getting cancelled or Rogan with his ridiculous contract. Chappelle is a great social commentator but a lot of this content that is questioned revolves around his sense of victimization. He's not getting cancelled.

Rogan is an example of the negative impact of democratization of serious content. It's fine that he's on but also fine that Neil Young is like "eff this platform". He's not getting cancelled.

Now SDN is an example of the positive impact of democratization. More likely that we would get "cancelled".

Rogan is an example who of someone who should've been held accountable for casually spreading misinformation, but instead is being held accountable for something that doesn't require it, and will only enlarge his footprint in the long run.

 

[deleted1111261]

I think Chapelle is a GOOD example.

I think Joe Rogan is a BAD example.

 

[Mandelin Rain]

View attachment 350448

Karen here to educate us on disparities.

Any word other than "Keynote" is probably preferred if the speaker is named Karen Knudsen.

Keynote with Karen Knudsen
Addressing Disparities

Such a cringe worth oversight, it could be pitched to the Onion

 

[jondunn]

 

[TheWallnerus]

Heard a wild statistic today that Nsg is only 5% female and of those, there are only 33 black female neurosurgeons in the US.

 

[temujim]

Is she saying success and motherhood are different things? Weird.

 

[jondunn]

 

[TheWallnerus]

Do these folks ever get "cancelled"? I mean really.

CANCELLED!

Columbia Suspends Psychiatry Head After 'Freak of Nature' Tweet About Model's Skin Color

Columbia University suspended the head of its psychiatry department Wednesday night after comments he made on Twitter about a model’s skin color, calling her a “freak of nature.”

www.nbcnewyork.com

 

[temujim]

Another plenary. Relentless. You will be made to care.

 

[medgator]

CANCELLED!

Columbia Suspends Psychiatry Head After 'Freak of Nature' Tweet About Model's Skin Color

Columbia University suspended the head of its psychiatry department Wednesday night after comments he made on Twitter about a model’s skin color, calling her a “freak of nature.”

www.nbcnewyork.com

Couldn't have happened to a sweller guy....

Redirect Notice

He’s really powerful,” the woman said. “Everyone had a very low opinion of him but no one says or does anything about it.”

“If you write a grant, he has to write the letter of support,” she added.

Others who worked with Lieberman described him as dismissive of women and people of color and prone to making misogynistic comments.

“He’s a destructive personality who has done a great deal of damage, who is only now being held accountable after decades of impunity,”

 

[RadOncDoc21]

Couldn't have happened to a sweller guy....

Redirect Notice

Crazy how all this was going on for years but the power of the tweet is what actually took him out.

 

[medgator]

Crazy how all this was going on for years but the power of the tweet is what actually took him out.

Social media can be a a tool for change sometimes....

I've always thought it's never a good thing to be on it as a chair or person of importance. Only bad things can happen and Dr Lieberman found that out the hard way that being on SoMe can be a really bad idea

 

[deleted941485]

View attachment 350799
Another plenary. Relentless. You will be made to care.

Trying to come up with some good 1984 terms for this

#equispeak
#diversitalk