- Joined
- Jan 16, 2003
- Messages
- 553
- Reaction score
- 2
IBTL... oh wait, it doesnt apply here.
FYI everyone, these threads go nowhere.
FYI everyone, these threads go nowhere.
ArmyDoc1999 said:Whether the training is done by an MD, DO, PhD, or the tooth fairy doesn't matter at all. It is how the student applies the lessons after they are learned that matters. If the best surgical residency in the country was allopathic and I got accepted to it, I would celebrate the quality of training I was about to recieve, without one thought to the fact that the teacher would have different letters than mine following his name. You would do the same if the best program in the country was a DO program and you got in.
We don't have to be considered different, because we ARE different.
JKDMed said:Although this is merely my own observation, I tend to believe that DO schools accept people with more life experiences and who tend, on average, to be more personable than allopathic students.
exmike said:That is as ridiculous as MD proponents saying DOs are intellectually inferior.
IndyZX said:I completely agree with you on the "its the quality of physician that comes out rather than the incoming student" thing, but I think that the above quote is the major question mark I have concerning osteopathy. Why do they market themselves as being some completely different method of treating a patient? Osteopaths, though they may have a tougher time with finding residency programs or whatever, are equivalent to their allopathic bretheren in all 50 states. That fact frequenters of this board will state until they are blue in the face.
However, for some reason, they will also speak of the 'unique' manner in which a DO provides care as being better than the approach of an MD. This is frequently manifested with the notion that an MD will treat the disease, while the DO will provide a whole-body approach that allows for greater patient care. I think that is not only bull****, it is downright insulting.
If we are equivalent, that's fine; I will never look down on a competant DO. However, I don't find much to respect in a person who wants things both ways.
ArmyDoc1999 said:It is because DO schools recognize that sometimes the more well rounded candidates may not have the best grades in undergrad as a result of their extracurricular activities. MD schools focus on academic standing ALOT more, while at DO schools, the interview and total resume carry more weight. DO schools also accept many more non-traditional students. This means people who may have been out of a classroom for some time.
doc3341 said:From what I have seen working in the hospital most MD's arent very good at talking to people. Dont get me wrong, There are plenty of great MD's out there, hell my PCP is an MD. But they are far and few between. DO's on the other hand are excellent communicators. Maybe its because their training really integrates the philosophy of treating the whole person??? These are my $0.02
Gleevec said:Ok, so DOs and MDs are different. That's all I wanted to know.
Also, maybe you would like a PhD treating someone in your family, because I sure as heck wouldnt (though PhDs make EXCELLENT research faculty-- which is what they are trained to do).
So the question is, if DO and MD are different, why is it that DOs do allopathic residencies. You would think that if they were so different, a lot of the best DOs wouldnt hop over into the allopathic residency training camp.
I by no means intend to discredit DOs, some of my favorite people on SDN are DOs (DrMom, QuinnNSU, etc). But I really think you are doing a disservice to everyone ArmyDoc1999 with your asinine ramblings insulting MDs. Again, if you want to be respected, you have to treat others with respect-- which you are yet to do on this thread. Its one of those lessons from Kindergarten thats just as applicable now as it was back then.