Because I thought I had misunderstood something about the DVM/PhD option that I am intrested in, I talked face-to-face with some of the LSU faculty at a conference this weekend. I was told that the average time required for the five students that have previously completed the program was about 5yrs. (You apply for grad school after the first semester and you work on it during breaks and during sessions, if you are capable handling the load) But, it depends on your intrests and if you wait untill after clinicals or during clinicals to finish. Also, it may depend on your advisor (etc) and experience.
It is good you got this information from the source, but a general warning is that the people running graduate programs can only give you their experience. They can't guarantee anything, and their estimates of time to completion will probably slant towards the shorter time frame. Your field is obviously very different than mine. With one year (full-time, mind you) in my lab, you would barely be getting a strong enough grasp on the techniques needed to even start a project. You could then start a project and if everything went perfectly (VERY unlikely) you could probably finish a project in 2 years, maybe. This is all highly hypothetical, of course. The problem is that there is alot more to a good PhD program that just bench work. You need to learn how to write papers, how to write grants, how to manage the work of technicians/other students and how to present your work. I just don't see how you can do this as a part time/summer student, especially in 1 year or so.
For example, I am in a program where we did all of our coursework and rotations our first year. I didn't accomplish a whole lot in my lab rotations, because I was pretty busy with coursework. This coursework was difficult, but probably nothing compared to first year DVM coursework. In this year I learned how each lab worked and if I liked the people and mentor and I learned the techniques, but I sure as heck didn't get any data that would have even gotten 1 paper published (let alone a whole project completed). Then I picked a lab and finished my project in 3.5 years (4.5 years total for my PhD). I would think it would be hard to finish a masters project in 1.5 years or so while also completing DVM work.
My point to all of you considering doing graduate programs is that you should understand that getting out fast is good, but if you get out without proper training and enough solid publications you will put yourself in a difficult position when the time comes to produce good research/acquire funding later on down the road. Even the best mentor would have trouble teaching you all of these things this fast.
Of course, this is all based on a very lab/bench oriented view of science. Maybe other types of science are less strict and less competitive, but in my field if you don't learn how to write grants and present/publish data you will not survive
😀.