Funny you should mention that; I got into a lot of trouble as a resident once for telling an irate neurosurgeon to "settle down" ... sorry, it's just something I say reflexively to people who appear disproportionately angsty about something. I'm not telling you to shut up.
Fair enough, I'll give full credit where it's due - you've been civil, if perhaps a bit disingenuous.
It's difficult, because every time I want to rebut or contradict you, doing so requires specific examples, and those specific examples run up against our privacy policy.
Tell you what - if Jet stops by after his post-hold is up, and voluntarily posts the post-hold PM I sent him, +/- the other PMs other mods sent him, I'd be happy to hash out the particulars with him and you.
The big picture I can discuss with you here and now, is the same big picture I've discussed before: to wit, I think a moderator's place is to do
as little as possible
Well, history is open to interpretation. I've been here a while, longer than my join date confirms, but that's neither here nor there. I remember previous mods' tenures, from the very good to the very bad. I remember the attempts to pseudo-split the gas forum off from SDN proper, and there are reasons why that didn't last.
You're confusing issues here.
First, the mere fact that most of us had the maturity and self-preservation instincts to put up with douchebag attendings rather than cry to administrators, doesn't mean those guys weren't douchebags.
Second, where the analogy further fails is that here, we the mods ARE the administrators, and there's a certain level of TOS-violating douchebaggery that we are, in fact, obligated to, you know,
moderate.
Yes, I/we all knew you locked it. I thought perhaps you were talking about another thread that got locked - because otherwise this quote doesn't make any sense:Well, I guess it makes some sense if you were playing games with trying to insinuate that anti-censorship Noyac didn't lock his own thread, hoping you wouldn't get called on it.