puju said:
Hello everybody,
Can you please help me rank these heme/onc programs w.r.t to training, academic potential (research/career development), and likeability etc. I really appreciate your input.
1. Stanford
2. Yale
3. Fred Hutch
4. Penn
5. U Michigan
6. Vanderbilt
7. Mayo
Thanks a lot guys!!
If indeed you have interviewed at these places you should have an idea about the differences and probably also an idea about your interests, which ultimatly would reflect your ranking.
In general, for fellowship even more so then for residency, rankings don't really make sense, as it is more about your individual goals....
Factors that may influence your ranking are:
1.hematology vs oncology vs double boad
specially at some of the stronger programs there is a puch for single board. MSKCC for example makes ot rather hard to double board. others are stronger in heme then on onc or vice versa
2. clinical vs basic research
MDAnderson for example is a great place for clinical research, but not that great for basic research
3. practise vs academics
Fox Chase is a great clinical training program but not academic
Dana Farber is maybe the best research program, but not that great of a clinical training program
4. specific research interests
different institutions may have an edge in certain fields over others. (i will elaborate on that)
5. location or any other factors (family etc...)
now to your programs...i can not comment on Vanderbilt or Mayo
Stanford
small program, clinical focus malignant heme and BMT..if these are your interest great place, otherwise there are better ones in Cali (UCLA or UCSF)
Yale
they try to revamp their training progra..at this moment not a top program( not even close), but double board with integrated training. research opportunities multiple at Yale university, no mentoring, quality of fellows sub-par, but academic institution, thus academic opportunities..probably not even a top 20 program
Fred Hutch
top program,. excellent in malignant heme and BMT( pretty much world class)
small class, world class research opportunities, great atmosphere
top 5-6 program, depending upon your interest probably even higher
Penn
top 4 at east coast, a tit below the top 3, but way above the rest
inegrated heme and onc( excellent heme), excellent basic research (top 3) clinically smaller. not that great in oncology with exceptions are GI, melanoma and breast)(head&neck does not really exist for example), fellows solely from top residencies (I guess it is the ivy league bias)
excellent BMT, but again small, expanding massively, which could go either way ( labor pain, vs post-fellowship opportunities), very friendly and supportive (disclaimer: for my own personal reason my #1)
U MIchigan
excellent clinical program, great research opportunities, good number of Pts, but suffers tremendously from location...does not get top candidates, however, PD extremely involved and motivated