- Joined
- Nov 12, 2012
- Messages
- 920
- Reaction score
- 740
Nope, and 3.6 cGPA.
That must have been a nice dream before you woke up.
Nope, and 3.6 cGPA.
But DO doesn't care about the schools I take them at either right?I have always heard it is better to take upper level classes than re-take basic science classes. The MCAT will prove how competent you are. The application system for medical school AMCAS, will not take into account that you have re-taken classes, only the DO system does that.
What, I have nearly a 4.0 in non-premed classes?That must have been a nice dream before you woke up.
3.6 is not nearly 4.0What, I have nearly a 4.0 in non-premed classes?
That's why I'm assuming I'll get As in higher up classes/not pre-reqs.
Well when you take into account my science GPA, duh...3.6 is not nearly 4.0
(Also, back. Steak ramen!)
But DO doesn't care about the schools I take them at either right?
Ah so much to consider, thank you.
HUH, because clearly you are not understanding what I was trying to say.In this thread, @PurpleLove has a 3.2 then a 3.1 then a 3.3 then a 3.6cGPA but nearly a 4.0 in her non pre-reqs which means her BCPM is terribad.
In this thread, @PurpleLove doesn't know what a DO is but then googles it and claims to know more than everyone here, including the DOs, about the DO path to medicine while sticking her nose up at the possibility of not being a real doctor. Later, @PurpleLove admits to strongly considering going DO.
This has been such a rollercoaster for me.
@Lucca I searched for me saying 3.1, couldn't find it.
Also, I have a total GPA of 3.6, a non-science GPA of almost 4.0, and a science GPA of 3.2. How does this not make sense?
Does cumulative mean not including science? Pretty sure it doesn't, correct me if I'm wrong.
OKAY, SO I WAS RIGHT? AND YOU/BOONLEAN are finding non-existing errors in what I'm saying?Cumulative means including everything. That's what cumulative means.
I thought UChicago had higher English standards? They are a LA School, after all.
I apologize for misquoting you on the 3.1
Cumulative means including everything. That's what cumulative means.
I thought UChicago had higher English standards? They are a LA School, after all.
I apologize for misquoting you on the 3.1
Chemistry.I'm curious, what is your major?
Oh I'm justttttttt so spoiled. No, I've worked hard for everything I have.PurpleLove is an epic troll
She's obviously playing the entitled immature spoiled character from Mean Girls
Chemistry.
Had no problems, bro. Got an A-, then B+, then B+.Well, if you're having problems with gen chem... good luck with the upper level courses
Had no problems, bro. Got an A-, then B+, then B+.
Upper level courses might be harder, but no more limiting the amounts of As they give.
Will do so!If you are from UChicago it wouldnt be a bad idea to start networking, find out who is on the board of admissions, do research with them, email for advice, shadowing, etc. If they get the gist that you are a highly motivated and determined individual it might be enough. You also need to start considering people for LORs.
UChicago was my first choice, I'm far from competitive though
Nope, not from what everyone says here. I have to go with them, sorry.Well you probably need to get those As in the first place
Had no problems, bro. Got an A-, then B+, then B+.
Upper level courses might be harder, but no more limiting the amounts of As they give.
I might double major in Biology. After the pre-reqs, it's not that many more classes. Not sure yet, though. 😀If your having a couple orgo hiccups its no biggy, good luck with pchem! I think its safe to assume that the course load for a chem major will buy you some leniancy with your GPA. Between pchem and analytical your taking some of the hardest classes there are. Plus being a non-bio major tends to make you more of an attractive applicant.
Will do so!
How do people find physicians to shadow?
I have one doctor so far, but I heard it's good to have a wide range?
If your having a couple orgo hiccups its no biggy, good luck with pchem! I think its safe to assume that the course load for a chem major will buy you some leniancy with your GPA. Between pchem and analytical your taking some of the hardest classes there are. Plus being a non-bio major tends to make you more of an attractive applicant.
If your having a couple orgo hiccups its no biggy, good luck with pchem! I think its safe to assume that the course load for a chem major will buy you some leniancy with your GPA. Between pchem and analytical your taking some of the hardest classes there are. Plus being a non-bio major tends to make you more of an attractive applicant.
@PurpleLove attends UChicago?
I might double major in Biology. After the pre-reqs, it's not that many more classes. Not sure yet, though. 😀
Idk, shot in the dark. It's either that or JHU but, honestly, @PurpleLove's character could just flip flop on that whenever, deny it outright, blah blah.
LOL, if people with B-'s get As in upper level classes, I'll be fine. Thanks for the concern.I think @PurpleLove is doomed for upper level courses. Her GPA will take a hit unfortunately
Dude, a chem major is just as popular as a bio major. And no one cares about majors in the first place (or their perceived uniqueness).
Doesn't matter. If you need to bump the GPA, you need to do well
LOL, if people with B-'s get As in upper level classes, I'll be fine. Thanks for the concern.
The difficulty of those classes make it substantially more reasonable to get Bs compared to As
I prefer Chem. I'd rather take something I enjoy...Still lowers the GPA. OP has the confidence she'll annihilate pchem, achem and ichem without a problem, so there's no stopping her. Ochem and gen chem were a distraction
Some people just don't do well in orgo, I'm lucky that i faired pretty well; took 9+hours a week of studying not including tests. If you aced gen chem and have a good work ethic the upper levels are still within your reach-If you can handle calc and physics.LOL, if people with B-'s get As in upper level classes, I'll be fine. Thanks for the concern.
Ha okay. I have a 3.3 with like 12 more Science classes to go. You're pre-CNA, bye bye.
I have a 3.2, above average.
I prefer Chem. I'd rather take something I enjoy...
which is it? I'm convinced you're literally making up numbers.
If I can't handle it, I'll drop it and major in Bio. But I like Chem, so I'll work hard and hopefully see results.Some people just don't do well in orgo, I'm lucky that i faired pretty well; took 9+hours a week of studying not including tests. If you aced gen chem and have a good work ethic the upper levels are still within your reach-If you can handle calc and physics.
OKAY, SO I WAS RIGHT? AND YOU/BOONLEAN are finding non-existing errors in what I'm saying?
I said almost 4.0 in non-science classes.
I said 3.6 cumulative.
I said 3.2-3.2 science.
Stop looking at what other people said I SAID.
Still lowers the GPA. OP has the confidence she'll annihilate pchem, achem and ichem without a problem, so there's no stopping her. Ochem and gen chem were a distraction
K, be back in a year.While I understand your position, your predicament would be more compelling if you've already taken your mcat, otherwise this whole conversation might be moot.
you wont be back because you'll be embarrassed to say you didnt get in anywhere and had to do those
SMPS you thought you were too good for
and before then, had to do a postbac in which you thought were only for stupid people to get easy As
and then you'll finally reapply with your hopefully better attitude and make a new username on sdn because you were too ashamed to be associated with your present personality
Never said I won't do an SMP/post-bacc. Said I thought they were just paying money to get As to get into medical school.
I did say I didn't want to waste a year doing them, so I'd prefer to take science classes at local colleges, now.
Why would I be embarrassed? A lot of what I said was joking/to get people mad on purpose. Some people need to pull the stick out of their asses.
I guess people get offended when you suggest you're learning more than them/working harder.you have the biggest one dearie. lodged really far
Doubtful. Just because people are insulted when you act like an @$$ towards a group of people does not mean that they all belong to that group...some people are able to empathize with other people. So, even if you were correct about people at 'lesser' schools all learning less than you, that still does not mean that your opponents belong to that group.I guess people get offended when you suggest you're learning more than them.
But many clearly do. I do agree with you, though I don't know why anyone who is hurt by the system would try to justify it.Doubtful. Just because people are insulted when you act like an @$$ towards a group of people does not mean that they all belong to that group...some people are able to empathize with other people. So, even if you were correct about people at 'lesser' schools all learning less than you, that still does not mean that your opponents belong to that group.