- Joined
- Dec 18, 2017
- Messages
- 6,830
- Reaction score
- 9,770
Lynch SAR
If we don't get to PM with each other, historically as it goes...
If we don't get to PM with each other, historically as it goes...
Hello world this is me
Life should be mmm mmm yeah, fun for everyone
Hello world come and see
Life should be fun for everyone
Life is easy if you wear a smile.... so why don't we all be friends? Any horseperson knows that the best friendships are built at the barn... right along the biggest rivalries. Horse people either have your back to the ends of the earth, or they're the most cutthroat humans known to mankind. Better check your girths one more time before galloping off into the sunset.... your best friend may turn on you at any moment for the glory of that blue satin ribbon.
Rules:
1. You may PM with the person above and below you on the roster. If you are the last person on the roster, you may pm with the first person on the roster. Please include the mods (or at least Sporty) in your PMs.
2. No screenshots.
3. Don't edit lynch votes. It is okay to edit regular posts. DO NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, DELETE POSTS.
4. Early actions and contingency actions are much appreciated. PLEASE get your night actions in early if at all possible. This is a large game and we need all the help we can get.
5. Dead must post in **** stars ****
6. Lynch closes at 9 PM CST. Night closes at 6 AM CST regardless of if mods are available.
Your fearless herd leaders are @PippyPony and @SportPonies
First lynch close at 9 PM CST tomorrow (Monday) night. Get lynching!
But I want to complain about losing one of my preferred PM partnersOkay but seriously, please drop the conversation about the roster switch. Ski was not intentionally moved from her preferred number, everyone moved means nothing. Carry on.
Barks voted dina, you've got it backwards cap'nDay 1 Aaaand they're off! Lynch Tally
Lupin (1) - genny
Mel (2) - Cray, Karabeans
Kara (1) - Snowy
Weim (1) - AM
Cray (1) - zigjazz
Capri (1) - skim
Barks (1) - Dina
8/29 voting
@Melchizedek you're the very early leader!
Lynch close at 9pm CST
~~~~~Barks voted dina, you've got it backwards cap'n
##lynch ziggyzaggy###
this will be the third time playing with them, so I figure the odds are that they are a wolf this time.
Always cracks me up when folks say "surely this time they be woof!"I just want to clarify that odds reset whenever a new game starts. She has a 3.45% chance of being a wolf this time.
Why would you need to force a reason? Either you believe your reasoning or you don't. If you don't, I think I need to put a wolf mark by your name.ok, so I thought that sounded better than "threw a dart and her number was hit"
Hmmm... based on your logic you could be a wolf also because I've never played a game where you were OGI just want to clarify that odds reset whenever a new game starts. She has a 3.45% chance of being a wolf this time.
Hmmm... based on your logic you could be a wolf also because I've never played a game where you were OG
Whoops I meant this to respond to killer now you. On my phone and Idk how to change itHmmm... based on your logic you could be a wolf also because I've never played a game where you were OG
Oh lord sure is one of my least favorite wordsSure.
Oh lord sure is one of my least favorite words
But I don't agree with your stats. Everyone has a higher than 3.45% of being a wolf provided there is more than one wolf which I feel is a safe assumptionI just want to clarify that odds reset whenever a new game starts. She has a 3.45% chance of being a wolf this time.
But I don't agree with your stats. Everyone has a higher than 3.45% of being a wolf provided there is more than one wolf which I feel is a safe assumption
NahMy stats are 100% accurate.
I'm not holding it against you. They've done the same to me lolziggy---D1 sucks. There is usually zero anything to base a vote on. However, I have been fussed at numerous times for putting up a vote, but not have a reason attached. I have been fussed at for saying "I rng'd". so tried to come up with something other than that to use as a reason. that is all. and all the statistics make my head explode.
Are we starting a game with math again
Lynch am
For making me think about statistics this early in the morning
You caught me, I am a huge statistics nerd.You say this, yet you liked my posts about them. You can't deny your true feelings meats...
I agree; AM, your math is terrible.
The chance of her being a wolf is equivalent to whatever ratio of wolves is at play. Which, in general is 20-25% wolves and for every game where this is true this is the chance of being a wolf.
Ugh - Can we not start with bad math again?View attachment 250336
That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works.So everyone has a minimum 20% chance of being a wolf equaling a grand total of 580%?
That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works.
Dnag
No, if it was at 3.45%, using your method... that makes 96.55% chance of being a villager... wanna multiply that by 29 too??? Then also everyone would be a villager.Which is why the number is at 3.45%. Doesn't work with anything higher at this point.
No, if it was at 3.45%, using your method... that makes 96.55% chance of being a villager... wanna multiply that by 29 too??? Then also everyone would be a villager.
Can we like
Stop this
Please
There's a 100% chance I will vote for the next person to post about statisticsbut it's funny