- Joined
- Jan 23, 2016
- Messages
- 34,392
- Reaction score
- 42,129
If assuming ~~4-6/29 are wolves. You have a 23-25/29 odds of being a villager and 4-6/29 of being a wolf.
Exactly. But one player cannot be more than one wolf.
If assuming ~~4-6/29 are wolves. You have a 23-25/29 odds of being a villager and 4-6/29 of being a wolf.
NO.There is a 96.55% chance of someone being a villager. And that's exactly why serious RNG voting is bad long-term. Other things have to be manually factored in to increase accuracy.
NO.
THIS IS NOT CORRECT.
There's a 100% chance I will vote for the next person to post about statistics
If I have a pile of 12 m&ms, 3 are blue and 9 are red, what's the chance that I will draw a blue M&M?Exactly. But one player cannot be more than one wolf.
If I have a pile of 12 m&ms, 3 are blue and 9 are red, what's the chance that I will draw a blue M&M?
What would you like to talk about instead?
Um, Horses ?
Ok but what if I say "AM, I have 12 M&Ms. 3 are blue and 9 are red. This one is named Bob (I don't show you). What chance is there that he is blue?"If you trying to grab a specific blue M&M, and not just any random one, there's a 8.33% chance.
Ok but what if I say "AM, I have 12 M&Ms. 3 are blue and 9 are red. This one is named Bob (I don't show you). What chance is there that he is blue?"
You're so punny.Lead the way.
whoops, meant unlynch dina lynch AMunlynch barks lynch AM
:troll:
why was barks on your mind?whoops, meant unlynch dina lynch AM
Because of the earlier tally mixup lolwhy was barks on your mind?
Lead the way.
Please no, not again.Are we starting a game with math again
Wow... that's pretty harsh!Ziggy always kind of sucks.
Wow... that's pretty harsh!
Agreed. Sorry friends, namely ziggy, I was not at all serious but it was not okay to say in any case. I'm sorry!Didn't catch that on my first read, only my spreadsheet setting up read but I agree this was... not cool
I, for one, welcome our new statistical overlords.
...
But also
Lynch AM
We already established last game that wolves are bad at math. (And that's all I'll say about that so yw dubz and skim and others)
I, for one, welcome our new statistical overlords.
...
But also
Lynch AM
We already established last game that wolves are bad at math. (And that's all I'll say about that so yw dubz and skim and others)
Not with that attitude you can't!Exactly. But one player cannot be more than one wolf.
I seem to recall cubs being assigned the role of the entire wolf packNot with that attitude you can't!
I feel personally attacked.DO NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, DELETE POSTS.
You wanna make Dina do all our dirty work again?I seem to recall cubs being assigned the role of the entire wolf pack
I’d be lying if I said this thought hadn’t crossed my mind.Lynch Paws
Kinda want to see if there's any hidden mechanics that'll trigger if someone votes the NPC
Why aren’t we voting cubs then?? Wow this game is easyI seem to recall cubs being assigned the role of the entire wolf pack
Why aren’t we voting cubs then?? Wow this game is easy
I don’t actually want to lynch himMaybe we should let Cubs play a little bit
***************************************************************
***************************************************************
@SARdoghandler why killer
Not enjoying her sitting on a joke vote for statistics for so long
is this a serious question?@Melchizedek will you stick with your npc vote?
what do you think of mel's vote?
I don't like this very much. It's D1 and you're trying to hide your rng vote with a stats vote? Rng votes aren't the best, but at the beginning of D1 I don't think people will be side-eyeing you unless you hold that vote to close and there were other things to go off of for voting later in the day.ok, so I thought that sounded better than "threw a dart and her number was hit"
##lynch ziggyzaggy###
this will be the third time playing with them, so I figure the odds are that they are a wolf this time.
is this a serious question?
lynch zigjazz