I Don't Worry About Satisfying Crazy

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

The White Coat Investor

Practicing Doc and Blogger
Partner Organization
20+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2002
Messages
5,220
Reaction score
2,441
As a private practice emergency doc in a small democratic group where what we collect has a direct bearing on my monthly paycheck, I'm a reasonably big proponent of customer/patient satisfaction type stuff. Not that I'm huge into it, but most docs seem to think they could walk out into the waiting room every couple of nights, and shoot half the patients without having a drop-off in their salaries.

But there are some patient satisfaction issues I don't worry about. Let me list a few.

1) The drug-seeker

I feel like I'm pretty good with people with narcotic issues. I spend a lot of time with them. I go over their CSD report in detail with them. I recommend treatment. I offer non-narcotic alternatives. I suggest other therapies and always offer to do an appropriate diagnostic work-up and often even offer to treat them with a narcotic if the work-up demonstrates something that I think merits one. But if they become upset I don't try to make them happy. I just calmly repeat what I will and won't do. I don't care if they hammer me on a patient satisfaction survey. If they're really bad, I just add "Drug seeking behavior" to the list of diagnoses and that ensures they won't get a survey. If they complain to the ED or to administration, our medical director or administrator looks up the chart, sees they're a drug seeker (because I always document what the CSD says and while we see patients with 3600 pills in the last year all the time, an administrator or lawyer has no idea that's going on) and supports me. If I happen to miss something and they go to the lawyer, the lawyer gets their records, sees this guy is a druggie and decides he doesn't want to get involved either.

2) The personality disorder patient

Maybe they're borderline or narcissistic or whatever. While I do my best to treat them as well as I can, I know from the beginning they won't be satisfied. But I also know that any attorney, administrator, or future doc that talks to them down the line is also going to quickly realize they're nutty. After 5 minutes, they're all going to hate the person. You want to be involved in a lawsuit for 3-5 years with a client you hate? Didn't think so. Lawyers are people too.

3) The patient I psych-hospitalize against their will

I've had a complaint from an SI patient I forced to be hospitalized who had a rotten time in the psych ward. I don't care. One mistake there and I get to spend 3-5 years dicking around with lawyers because I sent a suicidal patient home. If you are no longer suicidal, you better be convincing, honest, and trustworthy and have some friends or family members who are the same. If I get even a hint that you're not, it's off to the psych ward for you. And that chart will be buffed so well no one will ever question the decision. Plus, psych patients don't get patient surveys either.

4) The mean idiot

Sometimes I have a patient that is so dumb that they can't put it together enough to form a complaint or go through a malpractice suit. If they are also purposely unpleasant to me and my staff (and not actually ill), I stop worrying about them so much. Turkey sandwich? Heck no. Don't feed the bears.

5) The drunk who doesn't want to be tied down

I really don't worry a bit about tying people down and knocking them out against their will. It is actually really safe to tie someone down in an ER using 5 people, giving them a B52, and putting them on a monitor. Far safer than letting them walk out the door in that condition. Most of the time, they're much kinder after they sober up. Sometimes they're not. But you know what? Who is going to go to an administrator or a lawyer who is going to read their chart and see they were so drunk that they had to be tied down and knocked out and expect the administrator or lawyer to care? If the administrator or lawyer gives me crap about that, who do you think I'm going to call to take care of it the next time it happens?

6) The guy leaving AMA

Lots of people leave AMA. Most of the time they didn't need to be there anyway. And when they do, I have and document an appropriate conversation about the risks. Then I hand them the form and go back to my business. I don't lose any sleep about it. I don't beg them to stay. I make sure they're competent, I make sure they understand the risks, and I make sure I document those facts. Some of my favorite experiences happen when they get home to take care of their dog (or whatever dumb reason they wanted to go home) and their wife sees they left AMA with a diagnosis of cholecystitis and she marches them back to get admitted.

7) The guy who tells me he isn't going to pay me

These are usually dental pain patients. They have no dental insurance. They have no medical insurance. For some reason they think it's better to go to the ED and get a $1500 bill and not have the problem fixed than see a dentist, get a $150 bill, and have the problem definitively fixed. They tell me upfront they can't pay the dentist and don't have insurance. If they can't pay the dentist $150 you think they're going to pay me? Of course not. Do I care if this guy chooses my ED over the one down the street next time? Nope. Am I nice? Sure. Do I tell him what the best thing for him to do is (get a medical screen out from me so he doesn't get a bill and go see a dentist?) Sure. Do I care if he isn't happy that he got Pen VK, ibuprofen, 6 lortabs, and a dental block instead of 30 percocets? Not a bit.

Attention patients- If you want top-notch care, you might want to treat those delivering it as well as you can. It is amazing what an emergency doc and nurse will do for you even if they don't care about you. But they'll go to the ends of the Earth if they do.
 
How significantly can these patient surveys affect your reimbursement? What is the insurance companies justification of this...it almost doesn't seem legal to me. Your time is now less valuable because the patient did not like you, or the doc who is throwing meds at patients is now worth me because they are happy?

...maybe they will just stop reimbursing completely and go to a tipping system like in the restaurant industry...



7) The guy who tells me he isn't going to pay me

These are usually dental pain patients. They have no dental insurance. They have no medical insurance. For some reason they think it's better to go to the ED and get a $1500 bill and not have the problem fixed than see a dentist, get a $150 bill, and have the problem definitively fixed. They tell me upfront they can't pay the dentist and don't have insurance. If they can't pay the dentist $150 you think they're going to pay me? Of course not. Do I care if this guy chooses my ED over the one down the street next time? Nope. Am I nice? Sure. Do I tell him what the best thing for him to do is (get a medical screen out from me so he doesn't get a bill and go see a dentist?) Sure. Do I care if he isn't happy that he got Pen VK, ibuprofen, 6 lortabs, and a dental block instead of 30 percocets? Not a bit.

Attention patients- If you want top-notch care, you might want to treat those delivering it as well as you can. It is amazing what an emergency doc and nurse will do for you even if they don't care about you. But they'll go to the ends of the Earth if they do.[/QUOTE]
 
I have a pretty strict no narcotics for straightforward dental pain rule. Especially if you refuse my dental block. So kudos to you.
Likewise (or opposite), if you let me stab you in the mouth, I'll give you 7 Percocet. Again, likewise, refuse the dental block, asta lasagna, don't get any on ya!
 
Likewise (or opposite), if you let me stab you in the mouth, I'll give you 7 Percocet. Again, likewise, refuse the dental block, asta lasagna, don't get any on ya!

Yes. I tell residents that a dental block is both diagnostic and therapeutic. If you refuse the needle then it can't possibly hurt as bad as you're claiming (because if it did you'd say yes to anything to get it to stop).
 
I don't have time or mental energy for that. If you are here for tooth pain I'll run you on the state Prescription monitoring website. If you are clean, great I give you a few Percs. If you are not then you get PCN and discharge papers.

Texas is even simpler. Since I can't prescribe narcs it's Tramadol, PCN and discharge.
 
your list of drunks, seekers, and AMA patients ( who later find out their insurance co won't foot the bill) entails just about the only things that myself and most of my colleagues ever get c/o about. One site we work at has an insane amount of drug seekers and dirtbags. Working there more than 2 shifts in a row is painful. The question is of course, how long before admin gets tired of the 40% satisfaction scores.
 
your list of drunks, seekers, and AMA patients ( who later find out their insurance co won't foot the bill) entails just about the only things that myself and most of my colleagues ever get c/o about. One site we work at has an insane amount of drug seekers and dirtbags. Working there more than 2 shifts in a row is painful. The question is of course, how long before admin gets tired of the 40% satisfaction scores.
A forty percent PG isn't drug seekers. While the people that bother to write out comments tend to skew heavily towards the... experienced consumer of healthcare, even pretty malignant shops rarely run more than 5% seekers/malingerers. It's the patient that doesn't leave a comment and gives you "good" in every category that really drop your numbers. OTOH once you're consistently seeing 2 or more seekers a shift, your satisfaction as a provider tanks. The mental strain of dealing with the difference between what you know you should be spending your time on and what you're actually spending your time on is demoralizing.
 
I don't worry about those patients either.

I do worry about the somewhat normal person who comes in with unrealistic expectations.

Still trying to come up with a strategy for them.
Where I work, these are actually a very small minority. I'll probably just recommend an admission and if they don't want it AMA.
Either way, no survey. (Except if they only get an obs. Pretty sure these still get a survey.)
 
I don't worry about those patients either.

I do worry about the somewhat normal person who comes in with unrealistic expectations.

Still trying to come up with a strategy for them.
Where I work, these are actually a very small minority. I'll probably just recommend an admission and if they don't want it AMA.
Either way, no survey. (Except if they only get an obs. Pretty sure these still get a survey.)

I agree, that one is tougher than what we all used to think were the difficult patients.
 
That's an urban legend. Insurance pays AMA bills just fine.

I stand corrected.

A forty percent PG isn't drug seekers. While the people that bother to write out comments tend to skew heavily towards the... experienced consumer of healthcare, even pretty malignant shops rarely run more than 5% seekers/malingerers. It's the patient that doesn't leave a comment and gives you "good" in every category that really drop your numbers. OTOH once you're consistently seeing 2 or more seekers a shift, your satisfaction as a provider tanks. The mental strain of dealing with the difference between what you know you should be spending your time on and what you're actually spending your time on is demoralizing.

This last months score is 54%. we are over 90% at other sites. I can guarantee we have much more than 5% seekers. It's a smaller site that our group took over the contract, and prior to our group, there were lots of candymen there, so the seekers persist. I agree with you, seeing more than 1 or 2 a shift is painful. I wager its at least 50% of the visits I see when I work there , no joke.
 
I stand corrected.



This last months score is 54%. we are over 90% at other sites. I can guarantee we have much more than 5% seekers. It's a smaller site that our group took over the contract, and prior to our group, there were lots of candymen there, so the seekers persist. I agree with you, seeing more than 1 or 2 a shift is painful. I wager its at least 50% of the visits I see when I work there , no joke.

Stay tough and the seekers will figure it out after a few visits and the percentage will drop. Might take a year though.
 
I had a shift tonight with an 18% seeker/social bull$hit figure. Yep. Calculated that figure. ... And this is at my dream-gig site. I spent a lot of time ferreting out half truths from seekers and trying not to challenge the fixed, false beliefs of fibromyalgeurs, chronic Lyme patients, and alcoholics.

Its everywhere, people. Its everywhere in this place we call America.

I don't want to derail the thread; but one thing that I can't help but notice as a common theme in all the above categories of patients is...

Physical deconditioning.

The migraineur. The fibromyalgeur. The alcoholic. The affluenza-sufferer. The seeker.

They don't freaking MOVE.

I actually had a late 40-something female in tonight, demanding to "figure it out now!" as to why her +2 BL/LE edema is worse after .... months.

CXR. CMP. EKG. UA. TnI. B-Type.

Cardiosis, cirrhosis, nephrosis - all ruled out. Before any student yells: "Bilateral DVTs?!"... she had dopplers done "last week" which were negative.

One look at her med list and one look at her legs was all it took.

Percocet 10/325. Valium. Xanax. Flexeril. Requip. Klonopin. Whatever.

By the way, the quadriceps and gastrocs were softer than (insert your own dick joke here). She's baking bread in those designer shoes of hers.

"Okay. I have all of your results back. Lets talk about them. When we talk about the problem of edema in the ER, we have to start from the big, the bad, the worrisome, and we work backwards from there. We have ruled out heart failure, liver failure, kidney failure. You have already had ultrasound studies done to rule out blood clots. The most likely cause for your problems at this point is both the medications that you're on, as well as the fact that I can tell that you've done no physical exercise or conditioning for quite some time. When you don't move your legs... the blood vessels, the muscle tissue, the connective tissue... it all breaks down, and the integrity is lost. There's nothing to stop fluid from leaking out into places where it normally shouldn't be. At this point, I have to recommend that we do something to reduce your need for these drugs and get you more active. Your legs are deconditioned. We need to recondition you."

"You must be the worst doctor, ever. Don't you see that this isn't my fault ?!"

For real. This actually happened.

Here's what I wanted to say, but didn't:

"HEY! Listen up, basic white b!tch. I'm not the bad doctor. The bad doctors are the ones that have you doped up on eleventeen meds and don't have the cojones to tell you that you have a choice at this point in your life: Either you get busy getting fit, or get busy sliding into the nursing home. There is no good reason why you can't do this. You're not a victim of anything but your own self. Get a grip and keep it. Hold on tight. This might hurt."

Here's what I said in response:

"I'm sorry; but these are the facts. The most likely cause for your symptoms is the result of a bad mix of medications and global chronic deconditioning. I can help you; but, things are going to have to change."

Of course, she stormed out. Guaranteed my PG scores suck if she gets a survey. What do I do?

Do I give her a label of "drug seeking behavior" so she doesn't get a survey? No; that's not right.
Do I lie to her like all the other milquetoast MDs? No; that's not right.
Do I give her more narcs? No; that's not right.

I lose. There is no way to win this one.
 
Last edited:
Emergency Medicine was always my absolute dream specialty (it still is I suppose) right up until I was forced to realise that certain physical limitations means that working in EM will forever remain a dream. If I was able to do EM though, and the hospital I worked at was expecting me to hand out patient satisfaction surveys, then being the sarcastic little **** I tend to be I'd probably be tempted to hand out Ouija boards instead. There you go, there's your patient satisfaction survey; if you're not dead then congratulations and please leave the Ouija board at the front desk when you leave, if in the unfortunate event of your demise you wish to make a complaint then feel free to try and contact the hospital via seance.
 
While I'm thinking about it; I suggested some sort of "mandatory physical activity program" (with obvious exceptions) be instituted at most people's place of employment as a part of a nationwide self-betterment program. This was (sorry; out of context) in a discussion at work about "what to do about this (abovementioned) problem". Of course; Godwin's law applied, and it wasn't long before I was compared to a Nazi, and accused of being "a fascist pig" by (gasp!) a millennial.
 
Don't know about the millennial thing but didn't realize deconditioning causes leg edema! That'll be useful in placating the non emergent leg edema people - along with telling them to get compression stockings. One guy I told to get compression stockings said 'but I hate wearing those! They cut off my circulation' lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Top