- Joined
- Apr 6, 2014
- Messages
- 14,146
- Reaction score
- 22,789
My school also fell a rank slot and with it my self worth dropped 17%
My school also fell a rank slot and with it my self worth dropped 17%
See, I just wish US News used their power for good. Like substitute the alumni giving rate with a quality of financial aid component. My school spends a ton of money trying to get alumni to donate and they send mailings/phone calls where they say to just donate $1 because it will help rankings. That money could be put to such better use. And then schools like NYU would start getting serious about aid because they are afraid of sinking in the rankingsMy school also fell a rank slot and with it my self worth dropped 17%
See, I just wish US News used their power for good. Like substitute the alumni giving rate with a quality of financial aid component. My school spends a ton of money trying to get alumni to donate and they send mailings/phone calls where they say to just donate $1 because it will help rankings. That money could be put to such better use. And then schools like NYU would start getting serious about aid because they are afraid of sinking in the rankings
See, I just wish US News used their power for good. Like substitute the alumni giving rate with a quality of financial aid component. My school spends a ton of money trying to get alumni to donate and they send mailings/phone calls where they say to just donate $1 because it will help rankings. That money could be put to such better use. And then schools like NYU would start getting serious about aid because they are afraid of sinking in the rankings
Hah, that's just plain clever. Hate the game not the playersMy school (as well as a number of others...but we were the one on the front page of a national publication) manipulating their giving rates to rise in the rankings. For example at [WingedOx College] if you made a 5 dollar gift to the senior class gift, they'd calculate that as five $1 gifts over 5 years.
They eventually changed the policy and our ranking ended up dropping about 15 spots (and our president had to return a bonus he received for crossing the 50% threshold).
Difficulty isn't from the material itself/text, but from curved exams against a student body full of valedictorians, national merits, top couple percent SATs etc. Multiple choice isn't inherently a cakewalk (eg MCAT). I once plotted the data from WashU against the AMCAS national data out of curiosity, and found that when you line up the MCATs there's a very large gap between GPAs. It's true that public system schools tend to be more deflated and you'll likely have to put in more effort to get informed about the premed process or find a lab to work in. But predictably, throwing a bunch of best and brightest against each other for limited A's does make for a tougher academic experience.At almost any school you go to within the United States you will most likely be using textbooks of similar quality subject matter, and have a plethora of different professors who will make classes hard or easy depending on their preferences in making tests, and as someone who goes to some little no name state school, I have a bit of a revelation for you. Getting an Engineering or Chemistry (or similar difficulty) degree will be difficult no matter where you go, just at my school, you may not be able to get as many resources to help you succeed, so in some regards it could be argued that it is harder to succeed. An anecdote to support this would be, that I have a friend in a similar program at a larger prestigious school where they get multiple choice for most of their Bio and Chem classes, and were shocked to find out that in my "weed out" classes, the professor would write up a fresh written exam that challenged you to recall the material and apply it in novel ways. Instead of comparing, maybe you should own up to either your mistakes/capabilities, but then again I'm just some random premed dude on the internet (n=1 and all that).
Difficulty isn't from the material itself/text, but from curved exams against a student body full of valedictorians, national merits, top couple percent SATs etc. Multiple choice isn't inherently a cakewalk (eg MCAT). I once plotted the data from WashU against the AMCAS national data out of curiosity, and found that when you line up the MCATs there's a very large gap between GPAs. It's true that public system schools tend to be more deflated and you'll likely have to put in more effort to get informed about the premed process or find a lab to work in. But predictably, throwing a bunch of best and brightest against each other for limited A's does make for a tougher academic experience.
OP's friend went to carib. Only explanation for waived MCAT.
Difficulty isn't from the material itself/text, but from curved exams against a student body full of valedictorians, national merits, top couple percent SATs etc. Multiple choice isn't inherently a cakewalk (eg MCAT). I once plotted the data from WashU against the AMCAS national data out of curiosity, and found that when you line up the MCATs there's a very large gap between GPAs. It's true that public system schools tend to be more deflated and you'll likely have to put in more effort to get informed about the premed process or find a lab to work in. But predictably, throwing a bunch of best and brightest against each other for limited A's does make for a tougher academic experience.
Would help to name the university if you want to help spread the wisdom for highschoolers' sake.To the person who wrote this advice, (I think he is now banned)
Yeah I agree with you. If I can change time, I would go back and go to Any "no name" school in my city instead of choosing the top university I'm in right now.