http://castle.eiu.edu/alsb/Archives/JELLvol12/You Can't Ask That final edit.pdf
PDF from ASLB Jounral of Employment and Labor Law, (not the best primary source but I don't have subscription to major law journals)
with references to law and prior cases
you can start at page 4
The conclusions I gained from this reading were the follows:
1) Asking questions related to gender that are not asked of male applicants and/or do not relate directly to the applicant's ability to perform the job functions is bad from a legal liability standpoint
2) Even if not illegal per se, and despite the varying factors and outcomes in these cases, when you read each one and think about the amount of back and forth lawyer playtime in the sandbox IT IS EXPENSIVE to defend these cases
http://employment.findlaw.com/hiring-process/illegal-interview-questions-and-female-applicants.html
Maybe not the best source, but gives some ideas
Asking "Should we refer to you as Mr., Miss, or Mrs.?" being a question is considered dicey, so I would say the below
whether I have considered what it would be like to be a physician as a female. The follow up question - have I ever shadowed a female physician before
per
@twistedroses
Is not a good idea from a legal liability standpoint.
It is a question referring to gender, and the article I posted, as well as every other thing I could find, said the equivalent of
"While it's perfectly legal to ask questions assessing an applicant's job experience, qualifications, and motivation, employers must avoid interview questions that single out female applicants, and are not also asked of male applicants." - See more at:
http://employment.findlaw.com/hirin...d-female-applicants.html#sthash.O58bP9sB.dpuf
An equivalent was stated in the link to the PDF above.
I normally wouldn't think too much of it, but the entire interview was unpleasant and it seemed like more of an attack than well intentions.
Would it be appropriate to notify the admissions office? Or should I just let it go?
from
@twistedroses
The conclusion I have of the above, is that it is in the school's best interest not to have asked this question this way, and that if this came to the attention of the school's legal liability department, questions of this sort would be re-worded to protect the school.
Lastly, schools have been taken to court applying a lot of the same legal principles, therefore the fact that the interview is for school and not employment does not get the school off the legal hook, they will still have to pay an attorney playtime to respond to any suit that a rejection was for academic reasons and that the questions do not represent discrimination
Therefore,
@twistedroses reporting this confidentially should not be discouraged but encouraged to protect the school and applicants from suits and discrimination.
TL;DR
1) To minimize legal liability, it is in the school's best interest not to ask the questions posed to OP
2) If OP confidentially reports this to the school, the school will be able to address this issue to reduce legal liability in the future
And this is bad why?