- Joined
- Feb 14, 2018
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi all.
Last edited:
On the typical UDS form there will be a spot to list your medications. The labs can account for meds you are taking. They can screen in/out other metabolites so there isn't a false positive. It should be a minor issue at most since many ppl are on some type of medication, so this is a common inquiry for them.
One of my parents works in an industry where a large percentage of people have PhDs, and people are literally fired/walked out under supervision immediately for any positive drug screen. So, yes, they care.I would be interested if there is any documented benefit from pre-employment drug screens at this level of training/education. Also, do places actually care about marijuana in your system? Besides it being technically illegal Federally and in some states.
But what do they care about exactly?One of my parents works in an industry where a large percentage of people have PhDs, and people are literally fired/walked out under supervision immediately for any positive drug screen. So, yes, they care.
I've been told that bupropion can, but personally it's never been an issue. If bupropion can show up positive, I would speculate that ADHD stimulants might also. A bit of time perusing Erowid would probably answer that question and be entertaining.To the OP or anyone with knowledge, which medications would look like a drug on a screen?
Maybe it has something to do with accepting government funds through Medicare and Medicaid or maybe it has something to do with DEA regulations for prescribing providers.But what do they care about exactly?
Exactly. Kaiser isn't going to endanger themselves by discriminating against a new hire for using a legitimate prescription, that's why it has to be cannabis.ADHD meds do show up in drug screen; however, when mine showed up the lab called to ask if I am legally prescribed the medication and asked for my pharmacy's and physician's information to verify. Once verified they did not disclose it to the employer because it was legally prescribed.
These 15 Medications Can Cause a False Positive on Drug TestsTo the OP or anyone with knowledge, which medications would look like a drug on a screen?
I would imagine much of that caring is related to insurance policies, liability, and the appearance of caring, but yeah, same result.One of my parents works in an industry where a large percentage of people have PhDs, and people are literally fired/walked out under supervision immediately for any positive drug screen. So, yes, they care.
I'm pretty sure that list is not for all drug screens. It's likely just the cheapest urinalysis tests, which are used as initial screeners despite their poor specificity, because they are significantly cheaper than the more specific ones. This is why they'll often perform a stepped-testing model and only use more specific tests if someone tests positive.Yikes! Ibuprofen made the list? This includes so many commonly used drugs/medications that it could potentially render tons of false positives. I'm surprised that drug tests would be that sensitive and lack specificity to such a high degree. That's concerning if it's accurate.
There is no reason you should be denied a position if you provide a copy of your prescriptions to the testing facility. You can appeal any results that you have a matching script for without issue and if you are denied a position you have a strong case for a lawsuit, unless it's marijuana, in which case you're SOL because it's still illegal at the federal level (and even if it weren't, employers are given latitude in regard to tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana).Thank you, but I’ve been burned before on these prescriptions and missed opportunities regardless of listing my medication. I don’t want to give too much info about it. Still curious about what happens and when.
Interestingly, my brother just got a job for a healthcare company (not providing clinical services) and his drug test is using a hair sample. I'm wondering if this is becoming more commonplace.
I wonder if it's because of the longer testing timeframe... around 90 days for most substances, right?Most likely not because of the cost. I guess if it’s a higher level position....maybe, but a UDS is likely $30-$50, depending on the panel being tested and the overall volume of people sent to the lab. A hair follicle test is $100+. It can go well into the hundreds, depending on what you screen for. I’m not sure if there is a volume discount, as i’ve only seen them done for high level positions.
Interestingly, my brother just got a job for a healthcare company (not providing clinical services) and his drug test is using a hair sample. I'm wondering if this is becoming more commonplace.
They do screen and they have withdrawn offers. However, your evidence of current prescriptions would make a case for an appeal if there was a positive finding.Hi all. I've been interviewing at Kaisers and was informed that after UND, if offered the job, the HR department will reach out and we'll need to do a drug screen within 48 hours. I was floored by this. I have prescription medications that can cause false positives so I normally stop those and had planned to, but I assumed that the drug screen would be closer to the actual date the post doc starts. Now I'm worried I won't be clear in 2 weeks if I do get the offer. Does anyone know how long it usually takes for the HR department to reach out/how long after receiving the offer I'd have until the drug screen? Anyone with past experience? If so, which specific Kaiser's? Any information is appreciated!