

176 is like the 99.9th percentile and means they only got 4 questions wrong in all of the LSAT.EDIT: you inspired me to check out the USNews rankings for the JD programs -- wow, the 75th percentile at Yale and Harvard are all the way up to 176! That's pretty damn wild.
M.D./J.D. is totally not worth it.
M.D./J.D. is totally not worth it.
It's probably true. The chances that you can really go full potential with both degrees is probably slim.how come?
why is that?
how come?
Was literally about to post what SU did.
I mean once you get both you can be a boss and be a malpractice lawyer..make bank?
I mean once you get both you can be a boss and be a malpractice lawyer..make bank?
Interested in both law and medicine how? Personally interested? If you think it's worth the time and money to get both degrees for personal intellectual satisfaction then that's one thing, but it's not a very practical combination. One cannot devote full effort to practicing law and medicine at the same time. Read the link SU1989 posted earlier.I have a friend who is in Georgetown's MD/JD program. It's worth it if you're interested in both law and medicine. It can be useful to have an understanding of law in the medical field, especially regarding tort laws, malpractice, etc.
you can flunk high school and make bank. you don't need an md/jd for making money.
lol i just an article the other day of some dude that dropped out in HS and was in a gang now he is a multimillionaire. whatta boss...
I have a friend who is in Georgetown's MD/JD program. It's worth it if you're interested in both law and medicine. It can be useful to have an understanding of law in the medical field, especially regarding tort laws, malpractice, etc.
I mean once you get both you can be a boss and be a malpractice lawyer..make bank?
Uh, no. Posts like this indicate how naive some premeds are towards lawyers. You don't need any experience in medical field, let alone a degree, to be a successful malpractice lawyer. As long as you have strong grasp in torts, you will be more than able to get into malpractice. Keep in mind though, malpractice isn't as always lucrative as people think - in fact, I met one lawyer who was in malpractice with other insurance areas besides medicine (keeps your market open).
If you are interested in law, become a lawyer. If you are interested in medicine, become a doctor. Pick and choose - don't try to fill up your ego by getting both degrees when in the end, you will end up not using one of them. Oh, and don't give me that crap about someone (n=1 or 2) successful as lawyer and doctor. Anyone who's serious about medicine knows better. If you really like law, just buy some books while you are on vacation. That'll do.
So, couple things to OP and other MD/JD supporters:
1) Lawyer isn't what you see in Law and Order. If you think that way, well maybe you think every doctor is like Dr. House.
2) There is really only one case that I can think of that MD/JD is applicable, and that's with health care policy. But even here, you don't need JD to get into policy-making or politics in general.
3) There is no such thing as physician-lawyer. Choose one, and stay with one. Oh, and maybe use Search engine? This was asked before several times.
Frankly I think the only reason a JD might be worth getting is if you know you're going to be in politics in the future. Even then it's probably unnecessary. But you certainly don't need a MD to be a malpractice lawyer.
Being a malpractice lawyer doesn't mean you're the prosecuting attorney.I honestly can't imagine someone getting an MD and then becoming a malpractice lawyer. It's like being a double agent 😱. Not cool.
I honestly can't imagine someone getting an MD and then becoming a malpractice lawyer. It's like being a double agent 😱. Not cool.
Just because it's useless doesn't mean everyone realizes that. If you had students willingly lining up to pay you another couple years' tuition at their expense, wouldn't you hype it up into a formal program as well?I see how MD/JD isn't the most practical career choice, but there are atleast 20+ joint programs in the US, so it can't be totally useless (I mean, someone must be using them)....
Uh, no. Posts like this indicate how naive some premeds are towards lawyers. You don't need any experience in medical field, let alone a degree, to be a successful malpractice lawyer. As long as you have strong grasp in torts, you will be more than able to get into malpractice. Keep in mind though, malpractice isn't as always lucrative as people think - in fact, I met one lawyer who was in malpractice with other insurance areas besides medicine (keeps your market open).
If you are interested in law, become a lawyer. If you are interested in medicine, become a doctor. Pick and choose - don't try to fill up your ego by getting both degrees when in the end, you will end up not using one of them. Oh, and don't give me that crap about someone (n=1 or 2) successful as lawyer and doctor. Anyone who's serious about medicine knows better. If you really like law, just buy some books while you are on vacation. That'll do.
So, couple things to OP and other MD/JD supporters:
1) Lawyer isn't what you see in Law and Order. If you think that way, well maybe you think every doctor is like Dr. House.
2) There is really only one case that I can think of that MD/JD is applicable, and that's with health care policy. But even here, you don't need JD to get into policy-making or politics in general.
3) There is no such thing as physician-lawyer. Choose one, and stay with one. Oh, and maybe use Search engine? This was asked before several times.
not necessarily, if someone likes law and medicine they can choose to do both its not a big deal. I doubt one of the reasons people ACTUALLY pursue the joint degree is to have a higher ego, the people who say they want to do it and they don't eventually, those are the people that wanted to do it for their ego most likely.
and i guess that can work.
I love how this guy talks about money at the end of three paragraphs in a row. Wonder what he might be bitter about? 🙄Frankly I think the only reason a JD might be worth getting is if you know you're going to be in politics in the future. Even then it's probably unnecessary. But you certainly don't need a MD to be a malpractice lawyer.