Monster Mash WW - Sign Ups and Game Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Oh sure. BJ offers free rides and people smile and think it's cute.

I offer free rides and people start making comments about white panel vans and candy and little kids.

Yer all a bunch of profilers.

So I see a bunch of these posts, I love you to death but I've seen next to nothing as far as strategy goes. You're usually much more aggressive.
 
I've noticed you have a thing against new players from what I've read in past games

Confirmation bias.

I don’t have a thing against new players. If you look, I have votes for plenty of vets. There are a lot of new players, though, and I know their meta less, so they stand out kore as sketchy to me.

It isn’t some new player hate like you are implying. And given how much I’ve helped new players, you are out of line.
 
So I see a bunch of these posts, I love you to death but I've seen next to nothing as far as strategy goes. You're usually much more aggressive.

Sometimes. Other games when I just don’t give a rip I’m not as aggressive. Why are you ignoring those games?

I’m aggressive also when I’m suspicious. I don’t have much this game.
 
Confirmation bias.

I don’t have a thing against new players. If you look, I have votes for plenty of vets. There are a lot of new players, though, and I know their meta less, so they stand out kore as sketchy to me.

It isn’t some new player hate like you are implying. And given how much I’ve helped new players, you are out of line.
Sorry I didn't mean to imply it like a hate but you're just agreeing with what I said: someone is sketchy just because they're new, like stranger danger.

It is my meta to not be on my phone at work except on break and to stay alive while driving 🙄

You were so nice yesterday. Wtf happened?
 
Sorry I didn't mean to imply it like a hate but you're just agreeing with what I said: someone is sketchy just because they're new, like stranger danger.

It is my meta to not be on my phone at work except on break and to stay alive while driving 🙄

You were so nice yesterday. Wtf happened?
:laugh::roflcopter:😆🤣 I can't I just can't
 
Not really I don't think it's too bad I mean sometimes when I read Crayola's posts I start thinking and daydreaming about what I'd like to do when I retire or where to go on vacation but then I read the next person's posts, like Genny, and I start getting refocused on the game and then wham out of nowhere comes Kaydub with some "YOU ALL VOTE NOW OR I KILL YOU" type of mod thing, or maybe that's WZ, I can never remember, but by the time I absorb it all and process and start to think about how to vote I'm really just ready for a snack, a drink, and a nap and then by the time I wake up and can pay attention again it's like oops I missed the lynch and now it's bedtime and I might as well just jump back in tomorrow morning.
That’s a DubZ/WZ (cause somehow, RM nicknamed me Dubz &, as a result, WZ & I are now glommed as one) thing? Maybe? I am never super like “vote now or I’ll kill you ded” - I am “I’ll kill you. Cause I can. Regardless of voting” type.

It’s a subtle difference but that’s me. Empress Subtlety 😉
 
As a person, I love you all and want to hear how you're doing and what you're up to.

As a mod catching up on 8 pages of thread after being unable to check in all day, I want you all to kill each other faster so I don't have to read as much 😛
You get me.
 

You know, it's actually fine. In high school I dressed up as a taxi cab driver and it had a little patch on there that said "free rides". So that was my nickname for the rest of high school. Fitting that I carry a similar legacy into my vet school education.

giphy.gif

*************
latest
*************


Coffee is dirty water. Gross.
********
Bean water. And tea is leaf water. Both gross
********
******
Thank you wolves. Now I don't have to figure out how to ww while I go for an interview
******
*********
GO KARABOU U GON B FAB
*********
 
I’m kinda of interested in watching those who seem to have maybe already lynched but get on again mainly near lynch close. Makes me wonder if they have night actions they have to be on for. Just a thought. I’ll be back after i take care of this cranky baby. :brb:
 
I’m also interested to look into who Kara has voted for & was most curious about; maybe she was on to something and the wolves felt it would be best if she was gone. :thinking:
 
Here are my thoughts this morning:
Haxx- He seems to add content and disappear, Cray mentioned looking into him more since his play style is the opposite of her own, and he does not contribute to larger discussion.
MJ- Never played with him, but he has contributed perhaps 1 or 2 posts with any content in them. When I asked why he voted for AM, he said that she has been more aggressive than he is used to, but did not go into further detail. He has also not listed any other players he thinks might be wolfy, and his D1 vote was a joke vote.
Cray- Not her usual "post happy" self, she acknowledged it, but so far has only given us one of her run downs, and I remember Kara asking her to post more of her thoughts before she died.
LIS- Also acknowledged that he doesn't have any strong feelz for anyone this game, and that is why he is being less aggressive with his posting. Never played a game with him where he isn't aggressive (in my limited experience with him), so this could be nothing, could be wolfy.
Allie- Seems a bit more quiet this game than last. Someone else mentioned it as well.
AM- Reading village for now, she was more quiet and evasive in the whisk game when she wolfed. So she either got herself together for this game, or is really just her village self.


I will be going back in a few hours to iso these players (and perhaps more) to see if I can find anything.
 
Sorry I didn't mean to imply it like a hate but you're just agreeing with what I said: someone is sketchy just because they're new, like stranger danger.

It is my meta to not be on my phone at work except on break and to stay alive while driving 🙄

You were so nice yesterday. Wtf happened?

Huh? Wtf are you on about?
 
@CoffeeQuestionMark How do you feel about allie today?
Conveniently I was just catching up with yesterday's posts.

I still stand firm with Allie. There hasnt been a lot more posts from her. Seems like she is really trying to not give much to go off of.
Though She pointed out MJ's sketchiness and I did agree with her, now I'm thinking, even if maybe it is a silly defense, if he really has depression he is probably just playing however he wants without really caring, like just for fun. Idk my sister has dealt with depression so I have a soft spot for that, but I guess he could very well be a wolf

The quiet one Haxx has me suspecting too. He jumped early on Jboo train. She ended up being an easy target for everyone but never seemed sketch to me personally.
 
Allie- Seems a bit more quiet this game than last. Someone else mentioned it as well.
Conveniently I was just catching up with yesterday's posts.

I still stand firm with Allie. There hasnt been a lot more posts from her. Seems like she is really trying to not give much to go off of.
:hilarious:
You guys, I literally get called out for this every game. Besides me being busy day 1 and not making it back to check the thread, I actually think I've been contributing more than normal. Or at least I'm making an attempt to. I never ISO people's posts and I spent way too long doing that yesterday trying to get good reads on people. I don't ever try to not give much to go off of. Why would I do that? I'm just quiet in nature and don't like arguing. Maybe I just shouldn't play anymore, but it should at least be clear that this is NORMAL for me. Unfortunately it's also normal for me when I'm a woof so take that as you will.

Maybe you just think I'm being quieter because Pippy isn't around for me to tunnel on and get into spats with...is that it?
 
...alrighty then...
Moving on

No. You're being rude. I did not say someone is sketchy because they're new.

I said it's easier to read a new person as sketchy because there's no meta. The difference might be slight, but it's important. I'm not inherently saying "new person = bad." I'm saying "new person = no meta = harder to read = can be easily interpreted as sketchy."

You're acting as if I hate on new players, and that is incredibly rude. It's also false.

You're just whining because I'm voting for you, but I explained why. You showed up early, then vanished, and now you're back with ... dubious, at best, comments. It's a lot like a wolf trying to sorta-participate-but-not-sure-how.

I'm voting for you for a reason. Not because you're new.
 
:hilarious:
You guys, I literally get called out for this every game. Besides me being busy day 1 and not making it back to check the thread, I actually think I've been contributing more than normal. Or at least I'm making an attempt to. I never ISO people's posts and I spent way too long doing that yesterday trying to get good reads on people. I don't ever try to not give much to go off of. Why would I do that? I'm just quiet in nature and don't like arguing. Maybe I just shouldn't play anymore, but it should at least be clear that this is NORMAL for me. Unfortunately it's also normal for me when I'm a woof so take that as you will.

Maybe you just think I'm being quieter because Pippy isn't around for me to tunnel on and get into spats with...is that it?

Maybe it's because some wolves are coaching Coffee to make sure she participates more, and she isn't sure how so she is trying to find a few easily defensible points to make.
 
No. You're being rude. I did not say someone is sketchy because they're new.

I said it's easier to read a new person as sketchy because there's no meta. The difference might be slight, but it's important. I'm not inherently saying "new person = bad." I'm saying "new person = no meta = harder to read = can be easily interpreted as sketchy."

You're acting as if I hate on new players, and that is incredibly rude. It's also false.

You're just whining because I'm voting for you, but I explained why. You showed up early, then vanished, and now you're back with ... dubious, at best, comments. It's a lot like a wolf trying to sorta-participate-but-not-sure-how.

I'm voting for you for a reason. Not because you're new.
You're changing with my words and calling me rude. I have absolutely not been rude nor have I suggested that you think I'm "bad" because of my newness.
From day 1 after even just my first post you called me on it, so yes I think it is very clear you're against me for that. Like I didn't have any analyses, I'm suspicious. And why, because I needed more data to analyze. Now that I'm analyzing, I'm suspicious. That's stupid and inconsistent.

I'm an easy target. I get it.
I had no suspicions towards you but you're trying so hard to force your argument that now I'm so sure you must be wolf.
 
You're changing with my words and calling me rude. I have absolutely not been rude nor have I suggested that you think I'm "bad" because of my newness.
From day 1 after even just my first post you called me on it, so yes I think it is very clear you're against me for that. Like I didn't have any analyses, I'm suspicious. And why, because I needed more data to analyze. Now that I'm analyzing, I'm suspicious. That's stupid and inconsistent.

I'm an easy target. I get it.
I had no suspicions towards you but you're trying so hard to force your argument that now I'm so sure you must be wolf.

I don't even understand what you're saying. You didn't suggest that I think you're "bad" because of your newness, but "yes [you] think it is very clear [I'm] against you for [being new]"?

I mean, do you even realize you're contradicting yourself?
 
:hilarious:
You guys, I literally get called out for this every game. Besides me being busy day 1 and not making it back to check the thread, I actually think I've been contributing more than normal. Or at least I'm making an attempt to. I never ISO people's posts and I spent way too long doing that yesterday trying to get good reads on people. I don't ever try to not give much to go off of. Why would I do that? I'm just quiet in nature and don't like arguing. Maybe I just shouldn't play anymore, but it should at least be clear that this is NORMAL for me. Unfortunately it's also normal for me when I'm a woof so take that as you will.

Maybe you just think I'm being quieter because Pippy isn't around for me to tunnel on and get into spats with...is that it?
It's probably D1 I'm thinking of then, because I remember seeing your name more yesterday, but I still need to go back and look.
 
Conveniently I was just catching up with yesterday's posts.

I still stand firm with Allie. There hasnt been a lot more posts from her. Seems like she is really trying to not give much to go off of.
Though She pointed out MJ's sketchiness and I did agree with her, now I'm thinking, even if maybe it is a silly defense, if he really has depression he is probably just playing however he wants without really caring, like just for fun. Idk my sister has dealt with depression so I have a soft spot for that, but I guess he could very well be a wolf

The quiet one Haxx has me suspecting too. He jumped early on Jboo train. She ended up being an easy target for everyone but never seemed sketch to me personally.

I didn't jump on the Jboo train, I was the first to vote for her(?). There's a big difference there. I was wrong, but implying a bandwagon is when there was none is just plain wrong.
 
So, my observation today has been that BJ has changed her play style since day 1 after I called her out for too many posts. Seems to me like she may have had some wolfy friends tell her to tone it down a bit, because it's been a complete 180. I'm going to go back to my initial D1 vote and Lynch BJ.
 
One thing that's tough for me this game is that I haven't played with a lot of these vetties that are newer. I don't have the time to go back and sift through other game threads that they have played in, so there are a lot of fresh reads I need to make.
 
So, my observation today has been that BJ has changed her play style since day 1 after I called her out for too many posts. Seems to me like she may have had some wolfy friends tell her to tone it down a bit, because it's been a complete 180. I'm going to go back to my initial D1 vote and Lynch BJ.
I'm at work, so I can't camp for a lot of the day like I did on D1. I have to post around my work schedule, like I did yesterday. Just tried to start off today with some observations. To some extent it doesn't matter if I play the same as D1 or not, because either way I'll be called wolfy for something.
 
Day 3 Killing My Darlings Tallies

coffee (1) - LIS
LIS (1) - coffee
BJ (1) - Haxx

3/14 votes 🙁
Deadline 10pm EST


Not voting:
1. @Animal Midwife
4. @bryndiana.jones
5. @youngkal
6. @Coopah
7. @Crayola227
8. @Stella Mudd
9. @SnowshoeDog143
10. @allieh8607
11. @Mad Jack
13. @genny
14. @MixedAnimals77

Content Posts - Slow Day

1. @Animal Midwife - 1
4. @bryndiana.jones - 2
5. @youngkal - 2
6. Coopah - 3
7. @Crayola227
8. @Stella Mudd
9. @SnowshoeDog143
10. @allieh8607 - 1
11. @Mad Jack
12. LetItSnow - 6
13. @genny
14. @MixedAnimals77
16. CoffeeQuestionMark - 4
17. Haxx - 3

AM Question Quest Tally - 1
 
Last edited:
I didn't jump on the Jboo train, I was the first to vote for her(?). There's a big difference there. I was wrong, but implying a bandwagon is when there was none is just plain wrong.
I don't even understand what you're saying. You didn't suggest that I think you're "bad" because of your newness, but "yes [you] think it is very clear [I'm] against you for [being new]"?

I mean, do you even realize you're contradicting yourself?

Omg someone back me up here cause I'm not just being stupid right? :laugh:
He explicitly is saying that new people are more easily to find as sketchy. He said that. Some how when I try to quote him I'm saying he is "hating on new people" or that "he thinks new people are bad".

The timing here is awfully convenient: right after you're called out for not being aggressive enough.
 
Omg someone back me up here cause I'm not just being stupid right?
He explicitly is saying that new people are more easily to find as sketchy. He said that. Some how when I try to quote him I'm saying he is "hating on new people" or that "he thinks new people are bad".

The timing here is awfully convenient: right after you're called out for not being aggressive enough.
I don't I think he means to say that new people are inherently sketchy, but he is trying to get across that when you're playing with a new person, you don't have a meta on them. This means that everything they do you will look at in a more scrutinizing way, because you don't know what is normal for them and what isn't. For players that you've played with a lot before some of their behaviors may just be chalked up to their meta. I hope I'm explaining that okay.
 
Day 3 Killing My Darlings Tallies

coffee (1) - LIS
LIS (1) - coffee

It's a standoff!

2/14 votes 🙁
Deadline 10pm EST


Not voting:
1. @Animal Midwife
4. @bryndiana.jones
5. @youngkal
6. @Coopah
7. @Crayola227
8. @Stella Mudd
9. @SnowshoeDog143
10. @allieh8607
11. @Mad Jack
13. @genny
14. @MixedAnimals77
17. @Haxx

Content Posts - Slow Day

1. @Animal Midwife - 1
4. @bryndiana.jones - 2
5. @youngkal - 2
6. Coopah - 3
7. @Crayola227
8. @Stella Mudd
9. @SnowshoeDog143
10. @allieh8607 - 1
11. @Mad Jack
12. LetItSnow - 6
13. @genny
14. @MixedAnimals77
16. CoffeeQuestionMark - 4
17. Haxx - 3

AM Question Quest Tally - 1


Psssst. Haxx voted for BJ.
 
Omg someone back me up here cause I'm not just being stupid right? :laugh:
He explicitly is saying that new people are more easily to find as sketchy. He said that. Some how when I try to quote him I'm saying he is "hating on new people" or that "he thinks new people are bad".

The timing here is awfully convenient: right after you're called out for not being aggressive enough.

You're not being stupid.

You're mischaracterizing what I'm saying.

And that is a super big pet peeve of mine.

And in a WW game, it's also tremendously sketchy because wolves have an inherent interest in making sure people are misunderstood, casting confusion, sewing doubt, and trying to twist people's words to make them shady.
 
The timing here is awfully convenient: right after you're called out for not being aggressive enough.

Your last observation is more on track with smart playing.

You're wrong, though. Look at the progression. Yeah, I got called out for not being aggressive like I often am, but my replies to you aren't a response to that. They're a response to me voting for you, and then you coming after me with things that mischaracterize what I'm saying.

So my "aggressiveness" (if you want to call it that) is a direct response to you. It's legit. It has nothing to do with ... whoever (Cray?) brought up my meta.

You can't ignore the context.
 
I didn't jump on the Jboo train, I was the first to vote for her(?). There's a big difference there. I was wrong, but implying a bandwagon is when there was none is just plain wrong.
Oops I looked back and
I don't I think he means to say that new people are inherently sketchy, but he is trying to get across that when you're playing with a new person, you don't have a meta on them. This means that everything they do you will look at in a more scrutinizing way, because you don't know what is normal for them and what isn't. For players that you've played with a lot before some of their behaviors may just be chalked up to their meta. I hope I'm explaining that okay.
It definitely makes sense what you're saying but to me it is one and the same. What is sketchiness if it is not that which results in being watched out of the corner of your eye?
 
Top