- Joined
- Mar 28, 2005
- Messages
- 288
- Reaction score
- 0
Got the same harsh UW rejection today...
IV from UC SF fresno on 8/25
IV from UC SF fresno on 8/25
You're right firsttima, I guess every program has it's specific preferences/filters. Looking at my interviews, I'm like ...Thank God I applied widely.Update: same harsh uw rejection. Mayo and Brigham rejection.
Second round ucsf invite and nw.
Very confusing emotions. Also same with Leospaceman - Hopkins and all these other selective places gave him an invite but rejection from ucinn.
About as random as I remember residency interviews...
Hmmm, guess it'll depend on what you're looking for. If geography were no consideration..Requesting group input:
Please rank the following programs in order of overall competitiveness/ desirability/ overall awesomeness.
Northwestern, Iowa, Cleveland Clinic, Loyoa, Brown
Hi guys! what is the average # personal IVs
DBiii out of curiosity....How deep into pulmonary research are u in?
"...Our initial review of your application file suggests that the likelihood of your ultimately matching into the UW program is low and, therefore, we are not able to offer you an interview...."
From university of Washington.
Maybe they should work on their people skills. I knew it was a reach to apply there, but damn. My other rejections have been a bit more respectful.
What an a-holey letter anyway...you wouldn't say anything in this vein to patients, yet they would to colleagues.They've been sending out that same email for years.
Friends don't let friends go there anyway. Lol.
What an a-holey letter anyway...you wouldn't say anything in this vein to patients, yet they would to colleagues.
Should tell you. A lot.
Current fellow at UW here. They are actually quite nice and supportive but can't really comment on the rejection letter. Feel free to PM me if you have questions about this or other similar programs, happy to help. GL!
That's what you HAVE TO say. Lol.
I know the game. I also know more than a few past fellows from your neck of the woods.
Top 5 spot by academic rep. No doubt about it.
I will say I picked UW specifically because I thought that for a top place it was more supportive of a variety of career paths and goals than the other places I interviewed--and I think I was right. We have a fellow on a clinical track, one per year on a clinical educator track and the rest on T32 research pathways but if goals change (as they frequently do), the leadership seems to be supportive and understanding of that--tough to find at other major academic shops. And yes, my clinical year is pretty brutal and busy--but isn't that what you want when you only do 18 months of clinical time?
And I don't really have to say anything, the programs not paying me (much).
Some of your past fellows tell a bit of a different story.
People obviously need to interview and make up their own minds.
I know you're not bring paid. BUT you're not exactly going out yourself as a fellow and THEN say anything "bad". That's just the way this game is played. I don't know you from Adam. I'm not accusing you of lying or having a "bad" experience. Just so we are clear. However, I DO know these past fellows and they are not so long past it was decades ago and they tell an interesting story that is not precisely what you are saying.
So.
The forum can do what it likes with anonymous postings. The salt's free.
I agree. GL everybody.
Current fellow at UW here. They are actually quite nice and supportive but can't really comment on the rejection letter. Feel free to PM me if you have questions about this or other similar programs, happy to help. GL!
I agree with what DBii says... it reeks of superciliousness and is in very poor professional taste and disrespectful even if they don't think you're 'worth it', and the fact that they send out the same letter year after year without bothering to change its content should give you a fair idea of what the program administration wants to portray itself as. Maybe they do it to make the ones who do get invites 'extra special' 😛 There are other ivy league places who send out much nicer rejection letters; I don't think it ever pays to burn bridges this way.Why does your program feel the need to communicate with it's applicants in this manner? I know UW was a reach for me, but I'm no slacker. It's almost as if they were angry I wasted their time.
Given that I will not be able to interview there, UW will never be able to erase the nasty first impression they just made on me (and everyone else they've rejected in this manner). I've lost quite a bit of respect for anyone associated with your program.
Only through with 1 interview, had 5 ppl interview me, and all of them were chill. With 'popular' cities, they won't need to, but with less popular/smaller ones, a decent amount of conversation may hinge on them trying to sell you the city or you trying to tell them why you'd be willing to live there. Most of it was them trying to answer my questions/concerns, a couple of the discussions were pretty much about why I was interested in the kind of research I was interested in pursuing (my cv/personal statement shows my commitment to research), but I guess it would be more clinical if that's more your thing. Overall, though I was stressed going in, it was all in all a very enjoyable experience.How much details do you need to know about previous publications/research projects that you included in your CV for the interview purposes?
For example if you participated as a data collector in few projects prior to residency, do you need to know the whole paper as if you written it?
what questions do you expect in the interview in general?
Have my first interview tomorrow; nervous
I have a message from a program, but "
Service Temporarily Unavailable"
at the eras website. I am going to go insane soon.
ya never know....there has occassionally been activity over the weekends. People have gotten invites at midnight, and if you're on EST which I am, my hopes stay up even until 6-7 pm that maybe some west coast PC decided to send out invites before closing shop for the day..Mixed feelings about a 3 day weekend... that's one more day of waiting without activity on the ivs front!
ya never know....there has occassionally been activity over the weekends. People have gotten invites at midnight, and if you're on EST which I am, my hopes stay up even until 6-7 pm that maybe some west coast PC decided to send out invites before closing shop for the day..
That's the spirit..never let the craziness smolder and die out!! : PThanks Leo, now I'm going to be obsessively checking my email even on the weekend... Lol!
Dbii, eras is up. .when is this supposed to end? STOP THE MADNESS!
Wowww.....worth waiting for!U MICH!!!!!!
Need some feedback about UCLA, Stanford, BWH and Hopkins. I'm starting on my interview trail and thought I'd be better able to assess programs/ask pertinent questions if I had a better general idea
Disclaimer: I'm not making my RoL or showing off... as an IMG, all these were pretty much out of reach I'd thought, and I consider myself very lucky to have even received invites
I like pulm probably a bit more than CC, but it was CC that got me interested in the field. The general opinion seems to be that NE programs are not that hands-on with procedures like chest tubes, perc-trachs, don't do their own intubations. I def want to be somewhere that is research-heavy, esp in PH and sleep. I'm not a procedure hound but I do want to receive good training and be really proficient at all the ICU procedural stuff when I finish my fellowship and I have no clue how these places are when it comes to their CC/procedural training. Anyone out there who can help out with some info?
Thanks jdh, I'm the moonlighting kind, so I'm hoping that if at least during those first 18 months I can get a decent number under my belt, I should be able to then build up those numbers on my own...hopefully!You'll need to ask fellows their numbers. Push them. It very doubtful at any of those spots you'll be getting a ton of procedures that other teaching services will be doing like intubations, surgical chest tubes, or perc trachs. You will spend 18 months doing clinical work and 18 months doing research. You will need to figure out if you're going to get the clinical experience you want in those 18 months. It's sounds like a good amount but it's a enough to get rusty depending on the set up.