USMLE Official 2019 Step 1 Experiences and Scores Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Holy crap. Are you seriously at 200K reviews?

Broke 50k just in January lol. Very much not proud of it since my "quality" has severely suffered from increased quantity. Doing cards just to be able to finish every day is very much a "do i know it or not, onto the next one" never really sit and ponder, or look things up i dont know, or even read the extra notes much anymore

plz help. Its a problem. Luckily I've had the past 2 months basically off due to break/easy class in January, this will not be sustainable going forward though, our notoriously hardest class starts next week lol

I think our intervals might be different? I'm about 50% matured too give or take. I get the "retaining a ton less" b/c you start confusing names sometimes especially in pharm lol.

I also want to finish before dedicated but would prefer finishing before mid april. Only time will tell

Yeah i lowered my max interval to 4months, maybe thats it? Oh and amen on the pharm thing i swear theres drugs with like 1 letter out of 15 thats different and its whole entire function is entirely different lol
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2019-02-04 at 10.25.07 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2019-02-04 at 10.25.07 PM.png
    364.7 KB · Views: 121
Broke 50k just in January lol. Very much not proud of it since my "quality" has severely suffered from increased quantity. Doing cards just to be able to finish every day is very much a "do i know it or not, onto the next one" never really sit and ponder, or look things up i dont know, or even read the extra notes much anymore

plz help. Its a problem. Luckily I've had the past 2 months basically off due to break/easy class in January, this will not be sustainable going forward though, our notoriously hardest class starts next week lol



Yeah i lowered my max interval to 4months, maybe thats it? Oh and amen on the pharm thing i swear theres drugs with like 1 letter out of 15 thats different and its whole entire function is entirely different lol
I've gone the opposite and slowed down, but at the cost of my time (and burnout and class grades and mental health) lmao. I used to do 1 or 200 more per hour than I do now, but I would realize I didn't truly know some of the information so I scaled back. But 1000-1200 cards is much more terrible when you go at .75 the speed you used to so really will have to be up to you to decide.

I'm the opposite my January is hell, and we don't know how february and march will be. Hopefully the gods of step1 smile upon us and we make it through
 
I've gone the opposite and slowed down, but at the cost of my time (and burnout and class grades and mental health) lmao. I used to do 1 or 200 more per hour than I do now, but I would realize I didn't truly know some of the information so I scaled back. But 1000-1200 cards is much more terrible when you go at .75 the speed you used to so really will have to be up to you to decide.

I'm the opposite my January is hell, and we don't know how february and march will be. Hopefully the gods of step1 smile upon us and we make it through

Yeah thats what I’m hoping to go back to once i get closer to finishing, the way youre doing it is so much more worth it (but agreed very rough mentally to do).

I feel you on the burnout/health deterioration, ya boy over here could definitely use a thiazide and some cardio now a days lol. I took 2ish weeks off in December for vacation and a preceptorship thing, and boy was it amazing how much healthier i got and better i felt after not being glued to a chair for 8-12hrs a day.

We’ll make it through this just gotta pray to our lord and saviors dr sattar/dr ryan/zanki and we’ll make it to the other side
 
I've gone the opposite and slowed down, but at the cost of my time (and burnout and class grades and mental health) lmao. I used to do 1 or 200 more per hour than I do now, but I would realize I didn't truly know some of the information so I scaled back. But 1000-1200 cards is much more terrible when you go at .75 the speed you used to so really will have to be up to you to decide.

I'm the opposite my January is hell, and we don't know how february and march will be. Hopefully the gods of step1 smile upon us and we make it through

Yeah thats what I’m hoping to go back to once i get closer to finishing, the way youre doing it is so much more worth it (but agreed very rough mentally to do).

I feel you on the burnout/health deterioration, ya boy over here could definitely use a thiazide and some cardio now a days lol. I took 2ish weeks off in December for vacation and a preceptorship thing, and boy was it amazing how much healthier i got and better i felt after not being glued to a chair for 8-12hrs a day.

We’ll make it through this just gotta pray to our lord and saviors dr sattar/dr ryan/zanki and we’ll make it to the other side
 
Broke 50k just in January lol. Very much not proud of it since my "quality" has severely suffered from increased quantity. Doing cards just to be able to finish every day is very much a "do i know it or not, onto the next one" never really sit and ponder, or look things up i dont know, or even read the extra notes much anymore

plz help. Its a problem. Luckily I've had the past 2 months basically off due to break/easy class in January, this will not be sustainable going forward though, our notoriously hardest class starts next week lol



Yeah i lowered my max interval to 4months, maybe thats it? Oh and amen on the pharm thing i swear theres drugs with like 1 letter out of 15 thats different and its whole entire function is entirely different lol

2Pdp.gif


60k in 30 days?!

It's kind of interesting to me that on Reddit these kind of numbers seem to be the standard. I made a post on there suggesting doing much more than ~200 cards/hr was likely sub-optimal and got like 20 downvotes. I think the best learning happens when you sit, ponder and look things up, but that's just me and I don't have much to back that up with yet.

I would take off the max interval. Maybe do a quick search through your cards and look at the ones that have a 4-month currently - how many are a stupid waste of time that you'll still remember 2 years from now probably? For cards that seem important or that I'm likely to forget, I'll often mark them wrong even I knew them, just to make sure I'll see it again before Step.
 
2Pdp.gif


60k in 30 days?!

It's kind of interesting to me that on Reddit these kind of numbers seem to be the standard. I made a post on there suggesting doing much more than ~200 cards/hr was likely sub-optimal and got like 20 downvotes. I think the best learning happens when you sit, ponder and look things up, but that's just me and I don't have much to back that up with yet.

I would take off the max interval. Maybe do a quick search through your cards and look at the ones that have a 4-month currently - how many are a stupid waste of time that you'll still remember 2 years from now probably? For cards that seem important or that I'm likely to forget, I'll often mark them wrong even I knew them, just to make sure I'll see it again before Step.

hahaha i would have upvoted u if i had a reddit account lol, its true. I felt i got the most out of zanki when i was doing around 400-600 cards a day and spending 2-3hrs on it. I was complaining to a buddy about an obscure stain i saw in a q (or at least i thought it was obscure), and he knew it on the spot said it was in the notes in a zanki card. I def need to start taking my time lol.

I'll give that a try! I usually do the same regarding marking ones wrong that im concerned about forgetting, especially once i notice the intervals are starting to get up there so its very likely i dont need the max interval as much as i think i do. I think im also going to check out the load balancer and see if it'll help at all.

Thanks a bunch man!
 
2Pdp.gif


60k in 30 days?!

It's kind of interesting to me that on Reddit these kind of numbers seem to be the standard. I made a post on there suggesting doing much more than ~200 cards/hr was likely sub-optimal and got like 20 downvotes. I think the best learning happens when you sit, ponder and look things up, but that's just me and I don't have much to back that up with yet.

I would take off the max interval. Maybe do a quick search through your cards and look at the ones that have a 4-month currently - how many are a stupid waste of time that you'll still remember 2 years from now probably? For cards that seem important or that I'm likely to forget, I'll often mark them wrong even I knew them, just to make sure I'll see it again before Step.
I find past 300/hr, sometimes I press spacebar prematurely and am like "oh yea I knew that". I used to also cheat by being stingy on the again button. Then I got a few wrong on tests that I should've known from zanki and stopped doing that pretty quickly (unless of course I have an exam in a day or 2 and the interval isn't too long yet.
 
For those of you with a June test date, how many hours are you putting into questions (and how many questions) on average every day at this point?

Right now I'm still in that mow through Zanki and other content mood right now, but have the fear I should be just pounding questions all day already. It's hard to tell with so many different school schedules and workloads at school for each poster.
 
For those of you with a June test date, how many hours are you putting into questions (and how many questions) on average every day at this point?

Right now I'm still in that mow through Zanki and other content mood right now, but have the fear I should be just pounding questions all day already. It's hard to tell with so many different school schedules and workloads at school for each poster.

It's week by week for me. Depends on how needy school decides to be.

On weeks where school doesn't need my physical body in a seat and we don't have too much other crap going on I'll do my reviews in the early morning, a set of 40 Q's + review through the early/mid afternoon, then school-specific stuff + new Zanki cards (related to school or UWorld) in the late afternoon/evening.

This past week & a half was busy and we had a OS CPA so I took a week off UWorld/adding new Zanki cards so I could re-teach myself cranial "air-hands" (smfh) and let my Anki cards cool down a bit (cause if you add too many new cards for too many days in a row those reviews eat ya alive ya feel?)

I think you're ultimately right though. Probably better to focus on FC's & learning now & start putting more time into QBanks later.
 
Last edited:
For those of you with a June test date, how many hours are you putting into questions (and how many questions) on average every day at this point?

Right now I'm still in that mow through Zanki and other content mood right now, but have the fear I should be just pounding questions all day already. It's hard to tell with so many different school schedules and workloads at school for each poster.

20 on weekdays, 40 on weekends

1-3hrs depending on how focused i am! But i havent had anything class related (that could be considered time intensive) since i started doing Qs consistently, so ill probably roll back to 20 everyday/catch up if i skip on weekends

Agreed that we should be focusing on content review for the most part rn!
 
For those of you with a June test date, how many hours are you putting into questions (and how many questions) on average every day at this point?

Right now I'm still in that mow through Zanki and other content mood right now, but have the fear I should be just pounding questions all day already. It's hard to tell with so many different school schedules and workloads at school for each poster.

Taking the test in May, going through about 60 questions a day. I do 40 Amboss random tutor, and 20 Rx or kaplan for the test I'm currently working on (my school has big tests on 3 organ systems at a time).

Also doing about 800 cards a day, currently have all of Zanki learning or matured (24.5K matured, 4K learning) except for neuro. Starting that beast next week.
 
Taking the test in May, going through about 60 questions a day. I do 40 Amboss random tutor, and 20 Rx or kaplan for the test I'm currently working on (my school has big tests on 3 organ systems at a time).

Also doing about 800 cards a day, currently have all of Zanki learning or matured (24.5K matured, 4K learning) except for neuro. Starting that beast next week.

Amboss vs Kaplan vs Rx thoughts?

I currently have Kaplan+Rx, planning to do UW during dedicated. I've been thinking about ditching Rx though and doing Kaplan->Amboss->UW instead though.

Also you're a god.
 
Amboss vs Kaplan vs Rx thoughts?

I currently have Kaplan+Rx, planning to do UW during dedicated. I've been thinking about ditching Rx though and doing Kaplan->Amboss->UW instead though.

Also you're a god.

Nah, just started Rx early and stuck to my 9 minute mile pace. When I see **** like people doing 60 thousand cards in a month - THAT'S ridiculous.

I think I'll be doing a full qbank review write-up after Step (also can't really say for sure right now because i've done zero Uworld questions). Here are my preliminary thoughts though:

Rx: these questions were good for focusing my zanki reviews. A lot of the time I would get a question wrong in Rx because I had never heard of the answer description. I'd go through my cards and find that it was there, just not in a cloze. So now whenever I go through a card I think about all the possible information that could be tested on that card, and how I would ask that question. Rx has definitely had the fewest drawing connection moments where I've thought "huh never thought about it that way before."

Kaplan: Has had the highest number of really good questions (IE, actually questions that consciously make me stop and think and have to reason my way through). Kaplan physio is definitely a strong point. However, a lot of the questions are simple one liners and many of the answer choices are simple "what disease" options, which make it a lot easier and probably not as good a prep for Step.

Amboss: I think there's more low yield nitpicky stuff here. I got one question about croup which was basically asking what the anatomic structure abnormality was that caused steeple sign, and the answer choices included four different parts of the larynx. There are also almost always 8-10 different answer choices, which I think is a cheap way of increasing difficulty. However, there have been some good questions that asked about familiar concepts in novel ways or had interesting ways of describing pathology. Overall, I'd say that it's a good resource but probably wouldn't be a good qbank to start with, which limits its utility. I think there are actually not that many medical students doing 3+ qbanks.
 
As in 200 new cards/hour, or 200 reviews? Or both?

200 reviews/hr is pretty much the limit of usefulness for me, at least. If I'm going to do news in a day, I'll usually mix them in with the reviews so I'm not sure how to measure time spent on those.

My philosophy is that every time you see a card and easily get it right, that was essentially a waste of mental energy: you didn't deepen or strengthen your understanding of the concept, and it would have been better for you to see the card tomorrow, or a week later, etc. If you apply that principle to 1000 cards/day, cumulatively that's a lot of wasted time. I suspect that if you are blasting through 300 cards/hr and really honestly do know the answers to those cards, you would be better served by increasing your intervals, and using the time you save to do qbanks.

^This is kind of the key point of "spaced repetition" - to filter out the easy stuff, and allow you to spend more time working on the difficult stuff. It might feel good to crank out 300 reviews/hr with 95% accuracy but you aren't learning, you're just patting yourself on the back. If things are easy, you probably aren't pushing yourself hard enough.

I think there are diminishing returns on Anki cards. I'm sure every Ankier has had the experience where you get a test question where you could easily answer the relevant Anki card but can't apply that information to this new context. Drilling 2000 cards/day likely just makes this worse. Just my opinion though.
 
200 reviews/hr is pretty much the limit of usefulness for me, at least. If I'm going to do news in a day, I'll usually mix them in with the reviews so I'm not sure how to measure time spent on those.

My philosophy is that every time you see a card and easily get it right, that was essentially a waste of mental energy: you didn't deepen or strengthen your understanding of the concept, and it would have been better for you to see the card tomorrow, or a week later, etc. If you apply that principle to 1000 cards/day, cumulatively that's a lot of wasted time. I suspect that if you are blasting through 300 cards/hr and really honestly do know the answers to those cards, you would be better served by increasing your intervals, and using the time you save to do qbanks.

^This is kind of the key point of "spaced repetition" - to filter out the easy stuff, and allow you to spend more time working on the difficult stuff. It might feel good to crank out 300 reviews/hr with 95% accuracy but you aren't learning, you're just patting yourself on the back. If things are easy, you probably aren't pushing yourself hard enough.

I think there are diminishing returns on Anki cards. I'm sure every Ankier has had the experience where you get a test question where you could easily answer the relevant Anki card but can't apply that information to this new context. Drilling 2000 cards/day likely just makes this worse. Just my opinion though.
Hm, interesting. I know we've had the discussion on increasing intervals in the past...I'm just afraid that I'll forget things, although I guess my % correct shows that I'm doing pretty decently. This is roughly the amount of time I spend on Anki per day, doing anywhere from 170 - 300 reviews/day (whatever is due) + 50 new cards/day (will probably ramp this up in second year).

Screen Shot 2019-02-05 at 11.57.37 AM.png Screen Shot 2019-02-05 at 11.58.02 AM.png
 
Hm, interesting. I know we've had the discussion on increasing intervals in the past...I'm just afraid that I'll forget things, although I guess my % correct shows that I'm doing pretty decently. This is roughly the amount of time I spend on Anki per day, doing anywhere from 170 - 300 reviews/day (whatever is due) + 50 new cards/day (will probably ramp this up in second year).

Will depend on your workload. I think there is a balance for everyone between going too fast and not retaining and going too slow and not having time for reviews/completing the deck/doing questions. At a certain point unless you're perfect or your school curriculum is intelligent, you will cut corners somewhere. For me I felt I had a headstart by starting M1 (though very disorganized) and that I would have time M2, but our tests are designed to fail about 5-15% of the class each time (teacher told an upperclassman we had it too easy and wanted to bring us down a notch), so it hasn't been looking as good for me.
 
Will depend on your workload. I think there is a balance for everyone between going too fast and not retaining and going too slow and not having time for reviews/completing the deck/doing questions. At a certain point unless you're perfect or your school curriculum is intelligent, you will cut corners somewhere. For me I felt I had a headstart by starting M1 (though very disorganized) and that I would have time M2, but our tests are designed to fail about 5-15% of the class each time (teacher told an upperclassman we had it too easy and wanted to bring us down a notch), so it hasn't been looking as good for me.
Woah now, don't be silly. If our schools wanted us to succeed and actually taught us the content we needed, while also having people to pass, we would end up with many more competent physicians. You wouldn't want that, would you?
 
Woah now, don't be silly. If our schools wanted us to succeed and actually taught us the content we needed, while also having people to pass, we would end up with many more competent physicians. You wouldn't want that, would you?
its not that simple. Last I checked there was no relationship between step scores and quality of physicians.
 
its not that simple. Last I checked there was no relationship between step scores and quality of physicians.
The correlation that is drawn is step 1 performance and ability to pass future in-house and licensing examinations.

And specifically I was referring to the post where professors were failing 5-15% of the class intentionally...

I think you may have misinterpreted my post and assumed I was linking a higher step score to a better quality physician, when instead I was saying that it would be appreciated if professors wanted us to learn the material well, do well in class, do well on boards, and understand the pathophys and treatment for diseases of our future patients.
 
The correlation that is drawn is step 1 performance and ability to pass future in-house and licensing examinations.

And specifically I was referring to the post where professors were failing 5-15% of the class intentionally...

I think you may have misinterpreted my post and assumed I was linking a higher step score to a better quality physician, when instead I was saying that it would be appreciated if professors wanted us to learn the material well, do well in class, do well on boards, and understand the pathophys and treatment for diseases of our future patients.
Yep. Not sure if our school gains anything from failing and making people pay tuition again, but it almost seems purposeful. We sometimes get exams where there are 5 options or more, select the true answers. The stems aren't even NBME based, and some of the select all that apply answer choices are actually just statistics (what % of people in 2018 have a stroke) or other useless facts (what complication did we think USED TO be caused by this bacteria (but actually doesn't). Or even tests based on the specifics of medical testing BRANDS (not like flow cytometry analyzes what, but what flow cytometry product do we use and it just lists a bunch of trademarked products). So you could know everything about a pathology and miss one of the above bull**** facts I listed above thrown in to wreck the curve and fail people if you didn't select it or selected it as a guess. IDK if any other school is like this it's ridiculous.

Oh and this has occured for more than 5 years and faculty just say "we all had it tough in the past suck it up" when people question these things or any reasonings.
 
Last edited:
Yep. Not sure if our school gains anything from failing and making people pay tuition again, but it almost seems purposeful. We sometimes get exams where there are 5 options or more, select the true answers. The stems aren't even NBME based, and some of the select all that apply answer choices are actually just statistics (what % of people in 2018 have a stroke) or other useless facts (what complication did we think USED TO be caused by this bacteria (but actually doesn't). Or even tests based on the specifics of medical testing BRANDS (not like flow cytometry analyzes what, but what flow cytometry product do we use and it just lists a bunch of trademarked products). So you could know everything about a pathology and miss one of the above bull**** facts I listed above thrown in to wreck the curve and fail people if you didn't select it or selected it as a guess. IDK if any other school is like this it's ridiculous.

Oh and this has occured for more than 5 years and faculty just say "we all had it tough in the past suck it up" when people question these things or any reasonings.
Wow I’ve never been more greatful to go to a school with NBME exams haha
 
The correlation that is drawn is step 1 performance and ability to pass future in-house and licensing examinations.

And specifically I was referring to the post where professors were failing 5-15% of the class intentionally...

I think you may have misinterpreted my post and assumed I was linking a higher step score to a better quality physician, when instead I was saying that it would be appreciated if professors wanted us to learn the material well, do well in class, do well on boards, and understand the pathophys and treatment for diseases of our future patients.
i highly doubt that an LCME school is failing 5-15% of the class intentionally to keep them back a year. Schools get dinged for this from the LCME. Yes professor written exams suck, but most of the time they try to do their best with the time and resources and directive they have. And lets be clear the material we learn here, some may be relavent but a vast majority of it will be expunged from our brains by the time we graduate, even step related "high yield" .
 
i highly doubt that an LCME school is failing 5-15% of the class intentionally to keep them back a year. Schools get dinged for this from the LCME. Yes professor written exams suck, but most of the time they try to do their best with the time and resources and directive they have. And lets be clear the material we learn here, some may be relavent but a vast majority of it will be expunged from our brains by the time we graduate, even step related "high yield" .
I hope to expunge the vast majority of it tomorrow around 5PM
 
1st NBME today, NBME 13 - 259. A great relief to know that I'm heading in the right direction. Exam in 4 months.

Also anybody else taking their test in mid/late May or June? We 're gonna have to go through an awfully long waiting period to get our results since they announced they 're changing the question pool, just like last year.


And here I was feeling good about my 230 on NBME 13 4 months out 😀:bow:
Still pleased with my performance though, my only goal was to "pass" it.
 
Anyone have a good 3 month dedicated study plan out there that includes Uworld Q's, pathoma, FA, sketchy, etc?
 
Welp it’s over. Overall I felt it was pretty manageable, I used only UFAPS and would say it covered ~85% of what I saw. I had an anatomy heavy test which kinda sucked but I also feel like a lot of the anatomy was straightforward combined with some wtf questions I never would’ve known. I did have a really crappy test experience though, the internet went down during my first block so that threw me off. And then during my last block this guy kept falling asleep and was the loudest snorer in the world. So that sucked. But as for the actual test I’d say it was doable. I don’t feel great about it but I guess no one does. Overall I’m glad it’s over
 
Welp it’s over. Overall I felt it was pretty manageable, I used only UFAPS and would say it covered ~85% of what I saw. I had an anatomy heavy test which kinda sucked but I also feel like a lot of the anatomy was straightforward combined with some wtf questions I never would’ve known. I did have a really crappy test experience though, the internet went down during my first block so that threw me off. And then during my last block this guy kept falling asleep and was the loudest snorer in the world. So that sucked. But as for the actual test I’d say it was doable. I don’t feel great about it but I guess no one does. Overall I’m glad it’s over
Im sure you killed it dude
 
Welp it’s over. Overall I felt it was pretty manageable, I used only UFAPS and would say it covered ~85% of what I saw. I had an anatomy heavy test which kinda sucked but I also feel like a lot of the anatomy was straightforward combined with some wtf questions I never would’ve known. I did have a really crappy test experience though, the internet went down during my first block so that threw me off. And then during my last block this guy kept falling asleep and was the loudest snorer in the world. So that sucked. But as for the actual test I’d say it was doable. I don’t feel great about it but I guess no one does. Overall I’m glad it’s over
Congrats on being done!! Did you do any other qbanks other than UW? How long was your dedicated period for? Thank you!
 
Congrats on being done!! Did you do any other qbanks other than UW? How long was your dedicated period for? Thank you!
I did Kaplan right before dedicated just going through one block a day. Didn’t really use rx except for a few questions but didn’t really like it. It seemed most similar to uworld with super long passages haha. But a lot of the passage was just normal physical exam and vitals. At least I hope they were normal I kinda stopped reading them towards the end haha. Dedicated was 5 weeks
 
I did Kaplan right before dedicated just going through one block a day. Didn’t really use rx except for a few questions but didn’t really like it. It seemed most similar to uworld with super long passages haha. But a lot of the passage was just normal physical exam and vitals. At least I hope they were normal I kinda stopped reading them towards the end haha. Dedicated was 5 weeks
Thanks for the response! Did you stick to UFAPS for dedicated? What did you think of Kaplan?
 
Thanks for the response! Did you stick to UFAPS for dedicated? What did you think of Kaplan?
Only UFAPS yeah. Kaplan was good. I would say it definitely helped me out going into Uworld. But idk how much of it I actually remembered going into the real thing.
 
Here is a question for all the Zanki-ites. Does zanki spoil uworld percentage as a predictor? Since zanki factoids seem positioned to answer uworld questions or are based on uworld questions.
 
2Pdp.gif


60k in 30 days?!

It's kind of interesting to me that on Reddit these kind of numbers seem to be the standard. I made a post on there suggesting doing much more than ~200 cards/hr was likely sub-optimal and got like 20 downvotes. I think the best learning happens when you sit, ponder and look things up, but that's just me and I don't have much to back that up with yet.

I would take off the max interval. Maybe do a quick search through your cards and look at the ones that have a 4-month currently - how many are a stupid waste of time that you'll still remember 2 years from now probably? For cards that seem important or that I'm likely to forget, I'll often mark them wrong even I knew them, just to make sure I'll see it again before Step.


People who say they do like 2k cards a day and do like 40 uworld questions an hour are lol. I can do max 100 uworld a day for both step 1 and 2 and the people in my class Do blew threw uworld in a couple weeks didn’t even do good. Took me a couple months but paid off >270+

TLDR version - slow the **** down
 
People who say they do like 2k cards a day and do like 40 uworld questions an hour are lol. I can do max 100 uworld a day for both step 1 and 2 and the people in my class Do blew threw uworld in a couple weeks didn’t even do good. Took me a couple months but paid off >270+

TLDR version - slow the **** down
how many cards did you do per day before step?
 
Here is a question for all the Zanki-ites. Does zanki spoil uworld percentage as a predictor? Since zanki factoids seem positioned to answer uworld questions or are based on uworld questions.
I personally don't feel like it matters because UW does such an excellent job of testing you on applying a fact not remember the fact. In that regard, I don't think doing Zanki cards for UW "spoils" anything as some people say. You still have to recall the fact, apply it, and then review it. If you get the question right, great! You managed to connect the dots which is the whole point and it reinforced the concept in your brain via question stem. If you get it wrong you just learned something new and you won't miss it again. I do not buy the idea that it matters. You get to the same place.

Percentage wise, yes it will slightly change it. If you only studied UFAPS and then did UW there are concepts you will not be exposed to at all before reading a question. Naturally if you are aware of a disease or fact you will have a higher chance of getting the question right. Percentages don't matter for the reasons they are often brought up IMO. It should be to show progress and maybe it makes us feel good to read that the guy who got 250 had 74% and SO DO WE so we will have a good shot at 250, but ultimately I don't think it being inflated a tad means anything.
 
how many cards did you do per day before step?
Didn’t use anki for step one but for step 2 I can do maybe a couple hundred new a day. Using wiwa plus my self made ones added

I used as an example bc we had people do 5 q banks and make sub 220 so apparently they never read anything besides the question lol. 20k practice questions yet no remembrance of what was needed.


Less is more
 
I personally don't feel like it matters because UW does such an excellent job of testing you on applying a fact not remember the fact. In that regard, I don't think doing Zanki cards for UW "spoils" anything as some people say. You still have to recall the fact, apply it, and then review it. If you get the question right, great! You managed to connect the dots which is the whole point and it reinforced the concept in your brain via question stem. If you get it wrong you just learned something new and you won't miss it again. I do not buy the idea that it matters. You get to the same place.

Percentage wise, yes it will slightly change it. If you only studied UFAPS and then did UW there are concepts you will not be exposed to at all before reading a question. Naturally if you are aware of a disease or fact you will have a higher chance of getting the question right. Percentages don't matter for the reasons they are often brought up IMO. It should be to show progress and maybe it makes us feel good to read that the guy who got 250 had 74% and SO DO WE so we will have a good shot at 250, but ultimately I don't think it being inflated a tad means anything.


I would not stress on percentile bc I ended at 89-90 but people who did way less first run thru percentile stilll broke 260. At least those who properly reviewed
 
Anybody know what resources Zanki drew from for his neuro deck? I'm going to start going through it soon and I can't find what Kaplan review source he used or what the misc or path sections came from.
 
I did Kaplan right before dedicated just going through one block a day. Didn’t really use rx except for a few questions but didn’t really like it. It seemed most similar to uworld with super long passages haha. But a lot of the passage was just normal physical exam and vitals. At least I hope they were normal I kinda stopped reading them towards the end haha. Dedicated was 5 weeks
Thanks for the response! Any idea on how best to prepare for the anatomy? Seems like its a big part of the exam nowadays
 
NON US IMG, 4 MONTHS OUT
GOAL 250+
NBME 13 10/20/18: 153 ( How on earth can i achieve an 100 point increase🙁 )
taking another test a month from now, lets see what that brings.
Good luck everyone.

MATERIALS: BB, UWORLD, FA, PATHOMA, SKETCHY MICRO.

EDIT:
NBME 15 1/10/19: 186 (33 points in 2.5 months, lets see how the next few weeks go, hoping for the best)
NBME 17 3/10/19: 194
NBME 16 3/18/19: 190 🙁
 
Last edited:
Im starting dedicated in a couple weeks and am struggling with First Aid. Everyone says just to read it but I feel like that is very inefficient and I retain very little. I tried watching boards and beyond alongside it but that feels so passive. Did anyone else struggle with this/what did you do to learn it?
 
Top